Published April 9, 2026 | Version 1
Journal article Open

Overview of the ESCAPE Dark Matter Test Science Project for astronomers

  • 1. School of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, England, MK7 6AA, UK
  • 2. School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK

Description

The search for dark matter has been ongoing for decades within both astrophysics and particle physics. Both fields have employed different approaches and conceived a variety of methods for constraining the properties of dark matter, but have done so in relative isolation of one another. From an astronomer's perspective, it can be challenging to interpret the results of dark matter particle physics experiments and how these results apply to astrophysical scales. Over the past few years, the ESCAPE Dark Matter Test Science Project has been developing tools to aid the particle physics community in constraining dark matter properties; however, ESCAPE itself also aims to foster collaborations between research disciplines. This is especially important in the search for dark matter, as while particle physics is concerned with detecting the particles themselves, all of the evidence for its existence lies solely within astrophysics and cosmology. Here, we present a short review of the progress made by the Dark Matter Test Science Project and their applications to existing experiments, with a view towards how this project can foster complementarity with astrophysical observations.

Files

openreseurope-5-25376.pdf

Files (693.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:811b45a4401e3a015ecd146246e8ab9c
693.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Zwicky F (1933). Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln. Helv Phys Acta.
  • Rubin VC, Ford WK (1970). Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions. Astrophys J. doi:10.1086/150317
  • Bertone G, Hooper D, Silk J (2005). Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints. Phys Rep. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031
  • Peter AHG (2012). Dark matter: a brief Review. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1201.3942
  • (2020). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron Astrophys. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910
  • Graaff A, Cai YC, Heymans C (2019). Probing the missing baryons with the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect from filaments. Astron Astrophys. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935159
  • Blumenthal GR, Faber SM, Primack JR (1984). Formation of galaxies and large-scale structure with cold dark matter. Nature. doi:10.1038/311517a0
  • Frenk CS, White SDM (2012). Dark matter and cosmic structure. Ann Phys. doi:10.1002/andp.201200212
  • Conselice CJ (2014). The evolution of galaxy structure over cosmic time. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040037
  • Buckley MR, Peter AHG (2018). Gravitational probes of dark matter physics. Phys Rep. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.07.003
  • Mayer L (2022). New and old probes of dark matter scenarios on galactic and sub-galactic scales. J Phys G Nucl Part Phys . doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac32ae
  • (2020). Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck. Astron Astrophys. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880
  • Arbey A, Mahmoudi F (2021). Dark matter and the early Universe: a review. Prog Part Nucl Phys. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103865
  • Turner MS (2025). Everyone wants something better than ΛCDM. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.05483
  • Allen SW, Schmidt RW, Fabian AC (2002). Cosmological constraints from the X-ray gas mass fraction in relaxed lensing clusters observed with. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05601.x
  • To C, Krause E, Rozo E (2021). Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: cosmological constraints from cluster abundances, weak lensing, and galaxy correlations. Phys Rev Lett. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.141301
  • Shajib AJ, Treu T, Birrer S (2021). Dark matter haloes of massive elliptical galaxies at ~ 0.2 are well described by the Navarro–Frenk–White profile. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab536
  • Sonnenfeld A, Cautun M (2021). Statistical strong lensing. I. Constraints on the inner structure of galaxies from samples of a thousand lenses. Astron Astrophys. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140549
  • Amorisco NC, Nightingale J, He Q (2022). Halo concentration strengthens dark matter constraints in galaxy–galaxy strong lensing analyses. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3527
  • He Q, Robertson A, Nightingale J (2022). A forward-modelling method to infer the dark matter particle mass from strong gravitational lenses. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac191
  • Bowman JD, Rogers AEE, Monsalve RA (2018). An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature25792
  • Barkana R (2018). Possible interaction between baryons and dark-matter particles revealed by the first stars. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature25791
  • McGaugh SS (2018). Strong hydrogen absorption at cosmic dawn: the signature of a Baryonic Universe. Res Notes Am Astron Soc. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aab497
  • Singh S, Jishnu NT, Subrahmanyan R (2022). On the detection of a cosmic dawn signal in the radio background. Nat Astron. doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01610-5
  • Bevins HTJ, Fialkov A, Lera Acedo E (2022). Astrophysical constraints from the SARAS 3 non-detection of the cosmic dawn sky-averaged 21-cm signal. Nat Astron. doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01825-6
  • Flores RA, Primack JR (1994). Observational and theoretical constraints on singular dark matter halos. Astrophys J. doi:10.1086/187350
  • Moore B (1994). Evidence against dissipation-less dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes. Nature. doi:10.1038/370629a0
  • Klypin A, Kravtsov AV, Valenzuela O (1999). Where are the missing galactic satellites?. Astrophys J. doi:10.1086/307643
  • Moore B, Quinn T, Governato F (1999). Cold collapse and the core catastrophe. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.03039.x
  • Kelley T, Bullock JS, Garrison-Kimmel S (2019). Phat ELVIS: the inevitable effect of the Milky Way's disc on its dark matter subhaloes. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1553
  • Kim SY, Peter AHG (2021). The Milky Way satellite velocity function is a sharp probe of small-scale structure problems. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2106.09050
  • Boylan-Kolchin M, Bullock JS, Kaplinghat M (2011). Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01074.x
  • Boylan-Kolchin M, Bullock JS, Kaplinghat M (2012). The Milky Way's bright satellites as an apparent failure of ΛCDM. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20695.x
  • Laureijs R, Amiaux J, Arduini S (2011). Euclid definition study report. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1110.3193
  • Mellier Y, Abdurro'uf , Acevedo Barroso JA (2024). Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.13491
  • Ivezić Ž, Kahn SM, Tyson JA (2019). LSST: from science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products. Astrophys J. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c
  • Sumner TJ (2002). Experimental searches for dark matter. Living Rev Relativ. doi:10.12942/lrr-2002-4
  • Bauer M, Plehn T (2017). doi:10.48550/arXiv.1705.01987
  • Baudis L (2018). The search for dark matter. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1801.08128
  • Bertone G, Tait TMP (2018). A new era in the search for dark matter. Nature. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0542-z
  • Tao C (2020). Dark matter searches: an overview. J Instrum. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/06/C06054
  • Balazs C, Bringmann T, Kahlhoefer F (2024). A primer on dark matter. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.05062
  • Oks E (2021). Brief review of recent advances in understanding dark matter and dark energy. New Astron Rev. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2021.101632
  • Cirelli M, Strumia A, Zupan J (2024). Dark matter. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.01705
  • Boveia A, Berkat M, Chen TY (2025). Snowmass 2021 cross frontier report: dark matter complementarity. SciPost Phys Comm Rep. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCommRep.7
  • Workman RL, Burkert VD, Crede V (2022). Review of particle physics. Prog Theor Exp Phys. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097
  • Navas S, Amsler C, Gutsche T (2024). Review of particle physics. Phys Rev D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001
  • Roszkowski L, Sessolo EM, Trojanowski S (2018). WIMP dark matter candidates and searches-current status and future prospects. Rep Prog Phys. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab913
  • Nagano K, Obata I, Fujita T (2019). Axion dark matter search with interferometric gravitational wave detectors. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1912.09123
  • Jedamzik K (2020). Primordial black hole dark matter and the LIGO/Virgo observations. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/09/022
  • Green AM, Kavanagh BJ (2021). Primordial black holes as a dark matter candidate. J Phys G Nucl Part Phys. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abc534
  • Green AM (2024). Primordial black holes as a dark matter candidate - a brief overview. Nucl Phys B. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116494
  • Dayal P, Giri SK (2024). Warm dark matter constraints from the. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae176
  • Adhikari S, Banerjee A, Boddy KK (2022). Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2207.10638
  • Belgacem E, Calcagni G, Crisostomi M (2019). Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with LISA standard sirens. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/024
  • Beacham J, Burrage C, Curtin D (2020). Physics beyond colliders at CERN: beyond the Standard Model working group report. J Phys G: Nucl Part Phys. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab4cd2
  • Alves Batista R, Amin MA, Barenboim G (2021). EuCAPT white paper: opportunities and challenges for theoretical astroparticle physics in the next decade. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2110.10074
  • Cirelli M, Doglioni C, Petricca F (2024). Dark Matter candidates, light and heavy. XVIII International Conference on TAUP. doi:10.22323/1.441.0344
  • Baker M (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. doi:10.1038/533452a
  • (2025). Open science. Research and innovation.
  • Banerjee H, Ferreiro Iachellini N (2023). xxx. 41st ICHEP.
  • Gazzarrini E, Garcia EG, Gosein D (2024). The Virtual Research Environment: a multi-science analysis platform. EPJ Web of Conferences. doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429508023
  • Bhattacharjee P, Bird I, Calore F (2023a). ESCAPE dark matter science project for EOSC future project (WP6.3). ARPHA Preprints. doi:10.3897/arphapreprints.e116673
  • Bird I (2021). ESCAPE science projects for EOSC-future. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6390607
  • Cuoco E, Doglioni C, Graf K (2021). The ESCAPE dark matter test science project. TOOLS. doi:10.22323/1.392.0029
  • Abercrombie D, Akchurin N, Akilli E (2020). Dark Matter benchmark models for early LHC Run-2 searches: report of the ATLAS/CMS Dark Matter Forum. Phys Dark Univ. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100371
  • (2019). Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb of collision data collected at √ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys Lett B. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.016
  • (2018). Prospects for searches for heavy and bosons in fermionic final states with the ATLAS experiment at the HL-LHC. Tech Rep.
  • Albert A, Boveia A, Brandt O (2022). Displaying dark matter constraints from colliders with varying simplified model parameters. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.12035
  • Bose T, Boveia A, Doglioni C (null). Report of the topical group on Physics Beyond the Standard Model at Energy Frontier for snowmass. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2209.13128
  • Boveia A, Doglioni C, Gao B (2022a). Summarizing experimental sensitivities of collider experiments to dark matter models and comparison to other experiments. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2206.03456
  • Boveia A, Berkat M, Chen TY (2022b). Snowmass 2021 cross frontier report: dark matter complementarity (Extended Version). arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2210.01770
  • Strassler MJ, Zurek KM (2007). Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders. Phys Lett B. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.06.055
  • Park M, Zhang M (2019). Tagging a jet from a dark sector with jet substructures at colliders. Phys Rev D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.115009
  • Cohen T, Lisanti M, Lou HK (2015). Semivisible jets: dark matter undercover at the LHC. Phys Rev Lett. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.171804
  • Cohen T, Lisanti M, Lou HK (2017). LHC searches for dark sector showers. JHEP. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)196
  • Schwaller P, Stolarski D, Weiler A (2015). Emerging jets. JHEP. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2015)059
  • Aad G, Abbott B (2024a). Search for resonant production of dark quarks in the dijet final state with the ATLAS detector. JHEP. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)128
  • (2024b). Search for non-resonant production of semi-visible jets using Run 2 data in ATLAS. Phys Lett B. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138324
  • (2025a). Search for new physics in final states with semi-visible jets or anomalous signatures using the ATLAS detector. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.01634
  • (2025b). Search for emerging jets in pp collisions at \sqrt {s} = 13.6 TeV with the ATLAS experiment. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.02429
  • Agnes P, Alexander T, Alton A (2015). First results from the DarkSide-50 dark matter experiment at Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso. Phys Lett B. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.03.012
  • Agnes P, Agostino L, Albuquerque IFM (2016). Results from the first use of low radioactivity argon in a dark matter search. Phys Rev D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.081101
  • Manthos I (2023). arXiv e-prints.
  • (2024). DarkSide-20k sensitivity to light dark matter particles. Commun Phys. doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01896-z
  • Bringmann T, Weniger C (2012). Gamma ray signals from dark matter: concepts, status and prospects. Phys Dark Universe. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2012.10.005
  • Charles E, Sanchez-Conde M, Anderson B (2016). Sensitivity projections for dark matter searches with the Fermi Large Area Telescope. Phys Rep. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1605.02016
  • Calore F, Serpico PD, Zaldivar B (2018). Dark matter constraints from dwarf galaxies: a data-driven analysis. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/029
  • Alvarez A, Calore F, Genina A (2020). Dark matter constraints from dwarf galaxies with data-driven J-factors. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2002.01229
  • Calore F, Zaldívar B, Serpico P (2021). Dark matter constraints from dwarf galaxies: a data-driven LAT analysis. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5592836
  • Bhattacharjee P, Calore F, Serpico PD (2023b). Gamma-ray flux limits from brown dwarfs: implications for dark matter annihilating into long-lived mediators. Phys Rev D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.043012
  • Bhattacharjee P, Calore F, Serpico PD (2024b). Gamma-ray flux limits from brown dwarfs: implications for dark matter annihilating into long-lived mediators. Phys Rev D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.129904
  • Bhattacharjee P, Calore F, Serpico PD (2024a). Brown dwarf analysis. doi:10.5281/zenodo.11519115
  • Unbehaun T, Mohrmann L, Smirnov M (2023). Prospects for combined galactic source searches with CTA and KM3NeT. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8298464
  • Smirnov MV (2024). Open-science integration of a combined analysis of KM3NeT and CTA into the EOSC infrastructure. XVIII International Conference on TAUP. doi:10.22323/1.441.0227
  • Unbehaun T, Mohrmann L, Funk S (2024). Prospects for combined analyses of hadronic emission from γ-ray sources in the Milky Way with CTA and KM3NeT. Eur Phys J C. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12279-z
  • Bengtsson F, Doglioni C, Ekman PA (2023). Baler -- Machine Learning based compression of scientific data. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.02283
  • Ekman A, Bengtsson F, Woolland O (2024). baler-collaboration/baler: blocked and error bound training. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10723669
  • Baumann M, Boch T, Pineau FX (2022). ADASS XXX. ASP Conf Ser.
  • Donath A, Terrier R, Remy Q (2023). Gammapy: a Python package for gamma-ray astronomy. Astron Astrophys. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346488
  • Marchand M, Lutz K, Amodeo S (2025). Accessing and using astronomical data: a series of Jupyter notebooks tutorials.
  • Hezaveh YD, Dalal N, Marrone DP (2016). Detection of lensing substructure using ALMA observations of the dusty galaxy SDP.81. Astrophys J. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/37
  • Keeley RE, Nierenberg AM, Gilman D (2023). Pushing the limits of detectability: mixed dark matter from strong gravitational lenses. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2251
  • Gilman D, Birrer S, Nierenberg A (2024). Turbocharging constraints on dark matter substructure through a synthesis of strong lensing flux ratios and extended lensed arcs. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1810
  • Bode P, Ostriker JP, Turok N (2001). Halo formation in Warm Dark Matter models. Astrophys J. doi:10.1086/321541
  • Asgari M, Mead AJ, Heymans C (2023). The halo model for cosmology: a pedagogical review. Open J Astrophys. doi:10.21105/astro.2303.08752
  • Birrer S, Amara A (2018). Lenstronomy: multi-purpose gravitational lens modelling software package. Phys Dark Universe. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018.11.002
  • Birrer S, Shajib AJ, Gilman D (2021). Lenstronomy II: a gravitational lensing software ecosystem. J Open Source Softw. doi:10.21105/joss.03283
  • Nightingale JW, Hayes RG, Kelly A (2021). PyAutoLens: open-source strong gravitational lensing. J Open Source Softw. doi:10.21105/joss.02825
  • Birrer S, Amara A, Refregier A (2017). Lensing substructure quantification in RXJ1131-1231: a 2 keV lower bound on dark matter thermal relic mass. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/037
  • Vegetti S, Birrer S, Despali G (2023). Strong gravitational lensing as a probe of dark matter. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2306.11781
  • Vegetti S, Koopmans LVE, Bolton A (2010). Detection of a dark substructure through gravitational imaging. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16865.x
  • Vegetti S, Lagattuta DJ, McKean JP (2012). Gravitational detection of a low-mass dark satellite galaxy at cosmological distance. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature10669
  • Hsueh JW, Enzi W, Vegetti S (2020). SHARP – VII. New constraints on the dark matter free-streaming properties and substructure abundance from gravitationally lensed quasars. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3177
  • Li R, Frenk CS, Cole S (2016). Constraints on the identity of the dark matter from strong gravitational lenses. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw939
  • Gilman D, Birrer S, Treu T (2019). Probing dark matter structure down to 10 solar masses: flux ratio statistics in gravitational lenses with line-of-sight haloes. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1593
  • Simon J (2019). BAAS.
  • Spergel DN, Steinhardt PJ (2000). Observational evidence for self-interacting cold dark matter. Phys Rev Lett. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3760
  • Vogelsberger M, Zavala J, Loeb A (2012). Subhaloes in self-interacting galactic dark matter haloes. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21182.x
  • Rocha M, Peter AHG, Bullock JS (2013). Cosmological simulations with self-interacting dark matter – I. Constant-density cores and substructure. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts514
  • Robertson A, Massey R, Eke V (2018). The diverse density profiles of galaxy clusters with self-interacting dark matter plus baryons. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly024
  • Robertson A, Massey R, Eke V (2021). The surprising accuracy of isothermal Jeans modelling of self-interacting dark matter density profiles. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3954
  • Nadler EO, Banerjee A, Adhikari S (2020). Signatures of velocity-dependent dark matter self-interactions in milky way-mass halos. Astrophys J. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab94b0
  • Kaplinghat M, Keeley RE, Linden T (2014). Tying dark matter to Baryons with self-interactions. Phys Rev Lett. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.021302
  • Sameie O, Creasey P, Yu HB (2018). The impact of baryonic discs on the shapes and profiles of self-interacting dark matter haloes. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1516
  • Despali G, Sparre M, Vegetti S (2019). The interplay of self-interacting dark matter and baryons in shaping the halo evolution. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz273
  • Zeng ZC, Peter AHG, Du X (2022). Core-collapse, evaporation, and tidal effects: the life story of a self-interacting dark matter subhalo. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1094
  • Robertson A, Harvey D, Massey R (2019). Observable tests of self-interacting dark matter in galaxy clusters: cosmological simulations with SIDM and baryons. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1815
  • Gilman D, Bovy J, Treu T (2021). Strong lensing signatures of self-interacting dark matter in low-mass haloes. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2335
  • Nierenberg AM, Keeley RE, Sluse D (2024). JWST lensed quasar dark matter survey – I. Description and first results. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae499
  • Zeng ZC, Peter AHG, Du X (2025). Evolution and properties of self-interacting dark matter subhalos until core collapse. Phys Rev D. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaae16
  • Strigari LE (2018). Dark matter in dwarf spheroidal galaxies and indirect detection: a review. Rep Prog Phys. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaae16
  • Acharyya A, Adams CB, Bangale P (2024). Indirect search for dark matter with a combined analysis of dwarf spheroidal galaxies from VERITAS. Phys Rev D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.063034
  • Armand C, Herrmann B (2022). Dark matter indirect detection limits from complete annihilation patterns. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/055
  • Bergström L, Ullio P, Buckley JH (1998). Observability of γ rays from dark matter neutralino annihilations in the milky way halo. Astropart Phys. doi:10.1016/S0927-6505(98)00015-2
  • Hayashi K, Chiba M, Ishiyama T (2020). Diversity of dark matter density profiles in the galactic dwarf spheroidal satellites. Astrophys J. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbe0a
  • Schneider A, Smith RE, Macciò AV (2012). Non-linear evolution of cosmological structures in warm dark matter models. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21252.x
  • Gilman D, Du X, Benson A (2020b). Constraints on the mass–concentration relation of cold dark matter haloes with 11 strong gravitational lenses. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz173
  • Gilman D, Birrer S, Nierenberg A (2020a). Warm dark matter chills out: constraints on the halo mass function and the free-streaming length of dark matter with eight quadruple-image strong gravitational lenses. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3480
  • Gilman D, Zhong YM, Bovy J (2023). Constraining resonant dark matter self-interactions with strong gravitational lenses. Phys Rev D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.103008
  • Yang S, Du X, Zeng ZC (2023a). Gravothermal solutions of SIDM Halos: mapping from constant to velocity-dependent cross section. Astrophys J. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbd49
  • Yang D, Nadler EO, Yu HB (2023b). Strong dark matter self-interactions diversify halo populations within and surrounding the milky way. Astrophys J. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc73e
  • Athron P, Balázs C (2017). GAMBIT: the global and modular beyond-the-standard-model inference tool. Eur Phys J C. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5321-8
  • Bringmann T, Conrad J (2017). DarkBit: a GAMBIT module for computing dark matter observables and likelihoods. Eur Phys J C. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5155-4
  • Renk JJ, Stöcker P, Bloor S (2021). CosmoBit: a GAMBIT module for computing cosmological observables and likelihoods. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/02/022
  • Cornell JM (2020). JPCS. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1342/1/012059
  • Balazs C (2025). EPJ Web Conf. doi:10.1051/epjconf/202531911002
  • Balazs C, Bloor S, Gonzalo TE (2022). Cosmological constraints on decaying axion-like particles: a global analysis. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/12/027
  • O'Hare C (2020). AxionLimits. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3932430
  • Yang KB, Wu Q, Wang FY (2022). Finding the missing baryons in the intergalactic medium with localized fast radio bursts. Astrophys J. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aca145
  • Muru MM, Silk J, Libeskind NI (2025). Fermi-LAT Galactic Center Excess Morphology of Dark Matter in Simulations of the Milky Way Galaxy. Phys. Rev. Lett. doi:10.1103/g9qz-h8wd
  • Audard M, Awaki H (2025). XRISM Constraints on Unidentified X-Ray Emission Lines, Including the 3.5 keV Line, in the Stacked Spectrum of 10 Galaxy Clusters. Astrophys J. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae17ad
  • Vegetti S, White SDM, McKean JP (2026). A possible challenge for cold and warm dark matter. Nat. Astron. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02746-w
  • Koudmani S, Rennehan D, Somerville RS (2025). Diverse dark matter profiles in FIRE dwarfs: black holes, cosmic rays and the cusp–core enigma. Mon Not R Astron Soc. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf778
  • Bozorgnia N, Bramante J, Cline JM (2024). Dark matter candidates and searches. Can J Phys. doi:10.1139/cjp-2024-0128