Vector Field Theory; A unifying theory of Everything
Authors/Creators
Description
Beginning from a thought experiment I'd had since year 11 physics, finally realised with the help of AI and fighting against Multiple sclerosis's short term memory loss, I believe I have discovered the universe
From this thought experiment arose the universal force equation, applicable to everything from physical interactions to abstract concepts like ideas, good and evil, truth and lies
F = k × σ × V
I believe to have found the source of mathematics, the reason for gravity and magnetism, consciousness, the reason for logic and emotion
Mathematics is derived from thermodynamic processes
Linking physics and metaphysics in one swoop
The universe, disappointingly, is less and more magic than often imagined, yet it is so beautifully complex. As beauty is complexity that functions
No religion is truly incorrect, string theory was the closest we'd gotten, Einstein gave us the red herring that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, which while technically correct, had limited our collective imagination
Thank you to every physicist with special thanks to Issac Newton, Albert Einstein, James Clerk Maxwell, Stephen Hawking, Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, Max Planck, Ernst Mach, Werner Heisenberg, Paul Dirac, Gabriele Veneziano, Yoichiro Nambu, Holger Bech Nielsen, and Leonard Susskind, John Schwarz and Michael Green, Peter Higgs, François Englert, Robert Brout, Gerald Guralnik, Carl Hagen, Tom Kibble and Edward Witten.
The first version was a product of ~7-8 days of work(28 jun - 06 Jul 25), while also developing the national energy network; https://nenergy.vercel.app/ A policy proposal for net zero
It's shockingly easy to link everything together, from QM, GR, psychology to politics, consciousness and emotions, spirtual texts to reality when truth is categorised isomorphisms https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXH5V06BIyEIUUpgdxw8RCMe_eD1ez91r - video explainer playlist
This document doesn't include a majority of my adjacent research, like the 7x6+n-polytrope
I'd gotten frustrated waiting for peer review, or for anyone to read past the title or 0=0.0..1 relative to 1, gotten bored with physics and moved onto everything else, from sociology in developing a society that's structurally designed to aim for joy and redeem bad actors [https://youtu.be/Uck9JZ4_44Y - Paradise Reciprocity Economic Framework]
Physics based fair pricing system https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19354391 designed to build a case to erase extractive debt
Along with various objective Judgement frameworks https://wwsutru.vercel.app/CoreTools/AFrameworkforJudgment.html and the Geometry of Definitions in information space https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/9ec890d1-e940-4811-b528-ceecf5f28287
The spherical polytrope visualiser is a rough visualisation of meaning across the 7 planes, each arm represents a chain of recursive interrogative structured information
The point is to see the direct center which contains 'the point', the wireframe sphere represents base knowledge, the faint sphere represents the bounds of understanding and outside that is incomprehensible. We see from the side perspective as Man are 2D perspective creatures
With no 'driving force' one can trace the implications back to the foundational priciples
Conscious will or observers(On) is added in 0.25 intervals, at O1 the point is hidden between the lines, requiring minor layers of abstraction to follow a conclusion back to its foundation, tracing it on a surface look is impossible however over time is relatively easy compared to the opposing harmonic 0.75
O2 0.5 is the stable harmonic, this should and is immediately obvious, it is describing a concept that is 'immediately obvious' as much as it describes a circle and a galaxy, this is functionally Pi as the universe sees it and the source of gravity as these arms extend indefinitely outwards for other polytropes to pass through and interact with
O3 0.75 negative, at this point the point has been obscured permanently through 2 layers of abstraction, it is now geometrically impossible to reach the point without already knowing the internal meaning, like assigning a variable in an equation or an implication
O4 1.0 we have a stable 3 layers of abstraction and so on, the point here is the actual point was lost on 0.75
Contact; JarrodHamiltonVFT@gmail.com