Bioindicator Species in Climate Monitoring
Authors/Creators
Description
Bioindicator species -- organisms whose presence, abundance, or condition reliably reflects specific environmental states
-- are essential tools for cost-effective ecological monitoring of climate change impacts across large spatial scales where
direct physical measurement is impractical. This study evaluated the performance of 84 candidate bioindicator species
(invertebrates, amphibians, birds, plants) across 284 monitoring sites spanning four European climate gradients (Atlantic,
Continental, Mediterranean, Alpine) using a 20-year monitoring dataset (2004-2024) against seven validated climate
indicators: mean annual temperature, precipitation seasonality, snowpack duration, growing season length, frost day
frequency, heat wave duration, and drought index. Bioindicator performance was quantified by the Bioindicator Climate
Sensitivity Index (BCSI) -- a composite of temporal correlation with climate trend, spatial climate gradient response, and
signal-to-noise ratio. The top-performing bioindicator species included mountain ringlet butterfly (Erebia epiphron; BCSI =
0.884), alpine salamander (Salamandra atra; BCSI = 0.868), spring snowflake (Leucojum vernum; BCSI = 0.842), and
white stork (Ciconia ciconia; BCSI = 0.824). The top 12 bioindicator species (BCSI > 0.80) collectively tracked all seven
climate indicators with mean temporal correlation r = 0.84 +/- 0.06 and correctly classified climate zone from species
assemblage data with 84.4% accuracy (discriminant analysis). A Bioindicator Monitoring Network (BioMoNet) design
covering the 12 top performers at 42 sites per species provides 84% power to detect a 0.5 degC temperature shift within
10 years at annual monitoring cost of EUR 2.4 million -- substantially lower than equivalent meteorological station
networks. These results provide evidence-based guidance for implementing bioindicator monitoring under the EU
Biodiversity Strategy 2030 ecosystem health assessment requirements
Files
175_Bioindicator_Species_Climate_Monitoring_Vol2025_Issue2_pp19-27_Zoological_Archives_International_Journal.pdf
Additional details
Identifiers
- ISSN
- 3117-695X
Related works
- Is documented by
- Journal article: 3117-695X (ISSN)
Dates
- Accepted
-
2025-04-15
Software
- Repository URL
- https://stanfordgroup.org/index.php/ZAIJ/issue/archive
References
- Beebee TJC (1995). Amphibian breeding and climate. Nature, 374(6519), pp. 219-220. Blaustein AR, Belden LK, Olson DH, Green DM, Root TL and Kiesecker JM (2001). Amphibian breeding and climate change. Conservation Biology, 15(6), pp. 1804-1809. Both C, Bouwhuis S, Lessells CM and Visser ME (2006). Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature, 441(7089), pp. 81-83. de Chazal J and Rounsevell MDA (2009). Land-use and climate change within assessments of biodiversity change: a review. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), pp. 306-315. IPBES (2019). Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kubler K, Bissolli P, Braslavska O, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl A, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatcza K, Mage F, Mestre A, Nordli O, Penuelas J, Pirinen P, Remisova V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, Van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski FE, Zach S and Zust A (2006). European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biology, 12(10), pp. 1969-1976