Relative Originism

Abstract

This paper begins from the claim that the calculational success of inherited mathematics and physics

does not by itself guarantee ontological legitimacy. The previous studies [1]-[9] progressively repositioned

occurrence, or boundary-occurrence, as the first assumption [1], reread time and measurable values as

projected values of a deeper causal structure [2], relocated physical constants from primal terms to

compressed reference values [3], and reinterpreted measurable physics and the Hilbert action as lower-

dimensional translational forms [4]. They further redefined zero not as absolute nothingness but as the sign

of non-capture, while introducing @ as the auxiliary sign of near-zero residue [5], reformulated the

variational principle, Yang-Mills theory, and the mass gap problem through the grammar of boundary residue

[6], reopened the ontological status of one, plus, minus, mass, energy, and capture [7], limited the legitimate

beginning of mathematics to the post-projective layer [8], and finally re-described geometry itself not as a

simple accumulation of point, line, surface, and volume, but as a grammar of relational field, projection, and

rebirth [9].

On the basis of this sequence, the present paper proposes relative originism. Relative originism does not

claim that a being within dimension possesses the absolute origin in completed form. Rather, it criticizes the

structural error by which inherited theories have elevated already captured and stabilized lower translational

terms - point, coordinate, time, space, 0, 1, geometry, constants, particles, antiparticles, fields, action, and

measurable values - into the final language of interpretation for existence as a whole. The paper therefore

distinguishes the beginning of calculation from the beginning of being, and reorders the ontological status of

mathematics and physics according to the sequence of occurrence, boundary, capture, non-capture,

projection, stabilization, measurable surface values, numerical grammar, geometry, and physical translation.

Within this framework, 0 is no longer the name of nothingness but an operational sign of non-capture [5], 1

is not existence itself but a boundary-captured sign [7], mathematics is not the first language of existence but

a posterior grammar that becomes legitimate only after projection [8], and geometry is not the self-evident

ground of reality but a translational structure that arises only after relational fields stabilize [9].

Through this repositioning, the present paper seeks to realign the direction of mathematical and

physical philosophy and to open a framework of contact through which general relativity, Einstein-

Cartan gravity, seven-dimensional geometry, torsion, compactification, the Higgs scale, the black hole

information paradox, and the problem of stable remnants may be reread from the standpoint of relative

originism. In this view, recent seven-dimensional Einstein-Cartan/G2 studies are not treated as direct

proofs of the present framework, nor as privileged coherence cases, but as examples within a broader

class of lower physical models whose formal results may exhibit limited thematic compatibility with

parts of the present interpretive direction. Accordingly, the paper predicts that residue, thresholdcontinuity, and stabilized remnants may be more fundamental than complete closure into zero [5][6],

and that constants and geometric structures alike may be better understood not as absolute beginnings

but as settled surface values within an observational phase [3][9].

In conclusion, the present paper does not abolish inherited theories but repositions their range of

validity. It does not reject mathematics, but delays its beginning [8]; it does not dismantle physics, but

relocates its ontological status [1]-[4]; it does not leave philosophy as empty metaphysics, but transforms it

into interpretive grammar; and it does not treat experiment as absolute proof, but as a site for discriminating

among lower models. In this way, relative originism is proposed as a research program that reconnects

philosophy, mathematics, physics, practical application, and experiment within a reordered sequence of

occurrence, boundary, capture, projection, and stabilization.