Published March 30, 2026 | Version v1
Publication Open

Development of a Low Bit Error Rate (BER) Coding Technique for Underwater Communication

  • 1. Government Polytechnic, Amadalavalasa
  • 2. MVGR College of Engineering(A), Vizianagaram

Description

Underwater communication plays a crucial role in transmitting data below the water’s surface. Maintaining the quality of transmitted information is essential, as underwater channels are highly affected by speckle noise and multipath currents, leading to Doppler frequency variations and changing node distances. The reliability of text data over acoustic channels is generally assessed through Bit Error Rate (BER) and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)[2]. Bandwidth efficiency can be improved using appropriate modulation schemes and robust error-control coding techniques. This paper proposes a novel channel coding technique that enhances data security, achieves a lower Bit Error Rate (BER), and operates with a reduced Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) requirement. A comparative performance analysis of the proposed Code is carried out against existing coding schemes such as Convolutional Code, Reed–Solomon (RS) Code, Turbo Code, and Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) Code for text data transmission in underwater acoustic channels. The evaluation employs different modulation schemes, including M-ary Frequency Shift Keying (M-ary FSK), Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK), and Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM). The results demonstrate that the proposed method improves reliability and efficiency in underwater communication systems.

Files

Development of a Low Bit Error Rate (BER) Coding Technique for Underwater Communication.pdf

Additional details

Dates

Issued
2026-03-30
svlnsv2i10010

References

  • 1. M. Stojanoic, "Underwater wireless communications: current achievements and research challenges," IEEE Oceanic Engineering Society Newsletter, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 10-13, 2006.
  • 2. Z. Sun, H. Guo, and I. F. Akyildiz, "High-Data-Rate Long-Range Underwater Communications via Acoustic Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 96-102, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.002.2200058.
  • 3. H. Esmaiel and D. Jiang, "Review article: multi-carrier communication for underwater acoustic channel," Communications, Network and System Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 361-376, 2013.
  • 4. Y.V. Ratnam, Dr. M. R. V. Rao, and Dr. B. P. Rao, "Optimum error control code for Underwater Acoustic Communication," Innovations in Electronics and Communication Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 371-377, 2016.
  • 5. J. Preisig and M. Stojanovic, "Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterisation," IEEE Communication Magazine, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 84-89, 2009.
  • 6. V. A. Olds, "Submarine communication systems: underwater acoustic communication," 2023.
  • 7. M. Freitag, M. Stojanovic, S. Singh, and M. Johnson, "Analysis of channel effects on direct-sequence and frequency-hopped spread spectrum acoustic communications," IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 586–593, Oct. 2001.
  • 8. M. Stojano vic, "On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel," Proc. of ACM SIGMOBILE MC2R, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 34-43, 2007.
  • 9. B. Srinivasan, Capacity of UW acoustic OFDM Cellular Networks," M.S. thesis, University of California, 2008.
  • 10. G. Cook and A. Zaknich, "Chirp sounding the shallow water acoustic channel," Proc. of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 4, pp. 2521-2524, May 1998.
  • 11. V. K. Vidhya and Dr. S. K. R. Kumar, "Bit Error Rate Performance of AWGN, Rayleigh, Rician channel," International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 2058–2067, 2013.
  • 12. M. D. Green, "Error Correction Coding for Communication in Adverse Under- water Channels," 0-7803-4108-2/97/1997 IEEE.
  • 13. Y.V. Ratnam, Dr. M. R. V. Rao, and Dr.B. P. Rao, "Upgraded Diminution code performance in sea water communication," Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 55-67, 2023.
  • 14. .I. N. John, P. W. Kamaku, D. K. Macharia, and N. M. Mutua, "Error Detection and Correction Using Hamming and Cyclic Codes in a Communication Channel," Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 220-231, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.pamj.20160506.17.
  • 15. Y. Labrador, M. Karimi, D. Pan, and J. Miller, "Modulation and error correction in the underwater acoustic communication channel," International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 123-130, 2009.
  • 16. N. A. Alrajeh, U. Marwat, B. Shams, and S. S. H. Shah, "Error correcting codes in wireless sensor networks: an energy perspective," Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 809-818, 2015.