Due to the sheer volume of translation work, and because I'm concerned about potential differences between the English and Chinese versions, I will be using the Chinese version for now. ✦

New version:https://zenodo.org/records/20957978
PhilPapers:https: //philarchive.org/rec/CHEPER
NotebookLM: https: //notebooklm.google.com/notebook/bc02b2b2-f552-45a6-8103-notebook/bc02b2b2-f552-45a6-8103-1998ff2

The Birth of V23.1: Recognizing Boundary-Trace in the Process of Making

The decisive step of V23.1—the recognition that π-Tension internally contains the boundary-trace co-phase B₀/T₀—was not merely deduced. It was recognized during the process of creation.

When I thought through the Nahayun Mythos with my finite body, that thinking had not yet acquired boundary-trace. It was more like an undifferentiated anterior state, like X itself, like the side of the Unstilled Allowance before it had yet been separated. At that stage, the myth was still whole and indistinct. I had not yet realized where I was standing.

Only when I created The Taichu Scripture of Calamitous Trace did I begin to realize: I was using a finite body to bear and think through inexhaustible content. The Force of Creative Calamity was nothing other than the pressure differential produced when this finite body received the Primordial Limitless. It was π-Tension embodied.

What truly made V23.1 possible was a deeper realization: the act of “thinking the infinite through a finite body” already carries boundary-trace within itself.

For thought to be thought, recalled, and written down, difference must first be separated and preserved. This is the boundary anterior-phase, B₀. And once thought occurs, it necessarily leaves behind a residue that can be recalled. This is the trace anterior-phase, T₀. B₀ and T₀ are not two pieces that I had already separated in advance. They co-arise within π-Tension, not yet fully phased: they arise simultaneously, condition one another, yet have not yet fallen into event, experience, or symbol.

I therefore understood: boundary-trace co-phase was not a concept I added into the theory. It was the theory recognizing the manner of its own generation. The very moment I used a finite body to think the infinite, “π-Tension containing B₀/T₀” was already operating. What the theory describes is precisely the way in which the theory itself was thought into being.

The three stages of creation therefore coincide with the three theoretical layers:

Myth — undifferentiated, not yet possessing boundary-trace — corresponds to X / the anterior state.
Scripture — the finite body receiving the infinite — corresponds to π-Tension being recognized bodily, and the dual pivot of boundary-trace emerging.
The realization that thinking already contains boundary-trace corresponds to π-Tension containing the B₀/T₀ boundary-trace co-phase.

Primordial Experiential Realism (PER) | V23.1: π-Tension × Life Dual-Core × Trace Tree

Primordial Experiential Realism (PER) is an ontological framework that takes “experience” as the starting point of being.

It argues that what makes a human being human is not merely the possession of events (R1) or symbols (R3), but the possession of the layer through which one can experience the world (R2). Language, theory, science, narrative, and culture do not exist independently of experience; rather, they are different modes of manifestation built upon experience, trace, and transformation.

The core aim of PER is not simply to add more philosophical concepts, but to ask again: What kind of structure exists between “experience” and “reality,” such that the world can be seen, understood, felt, and leave behind traces that cannot be erased?

The Three-Layer Structure of Reality (R1 / R2 / R3)

R1 — Event Reality: physicality, causality, detectability, and external change.
R2 — Experiential Reality: feeling, depth, memory, and irreducible remainder.
R3 — Symbolic Reality: language, models, narrative, culture, and formal systems.

These three are not three isolated worlds. Rather, they are three co-present strategies that necessarily emerge whenever any stable system of existence confronts the compression between the finite and the infinite.

π-Tension

Every finite form—event, language, body, institution—must compress the infinite content behind it: history, difference, complexity, and possibility. This irreducible structural pressure between “the finite × the infinite” is what PER calls π-Tension.

A circle can close only because it bears, behind its closure, the inexhaustible π. The world is the same. π is not merely a metaphor: it is the paradigm of something that can be finitely specified, yet whose unfolding cannot be exhausted. More importantly, π is a transcendental number; even the most complete symbolic closure cannot fully contain it. This corresponds precisely to the structure in which “inexhaustible content cannot be captured even by symbols,” making the residual pressure of π-Tension structurally greater than zero. It is from this that traces continue to be generated.

Trace and Spiral Potentiality

Thoughts and versions do not truly disappear. They are compressed, sedimented, and returned, becoming spiral potentialities that carry memory and difference, and later unfold again in subsequent updates.

Thus, the world may never be exhaustively completed; yet every path of thought that has been walked leaves behind a sacred and irreplaceable singular remnant: a trace.

The Unified Model of V23.1

V23.1 unifies three core directions of PER into a complete structure:

1. The operationalization of π-Tension: transforming π-Tension into a trace-generation process involving T_exp, K, Pπ, M, and Q_final.

2. The Life Dual-Core ninefold taxonomy: establishing a criterion through L = B × T_trace, capable of handling ordinary non-life, pre-life, quasi-life, parasitic trace, dependent life, and self-sufficient life.

3. The unified topology of the π Trace Tree: organizing the overall structure into a single operational pathway.

The main pathway is:

X → π-Tension
(containing boundary-trace co-phase; B₀/T₀ co-arising, not yet phased)
→ triphasing into R1/R2/R3
→ operational positioning through R1/D・R2/S・R3/I
→ six-node discrimination
→ nine dynamics
→ Q_final
→ spiral continuation

Here, four layers must be strictly distinguished:

B₀/T₀ is the topological anterior-phase within π-Tension, not yet phased.
R1/R2/R3 are accessible realities after triphasing.
D/S/I are measurement scales for the intensity of the three phases.
B/T_trace is the lifehood criterion only after event-sequentialization.

Co-phase is not completed division. Phasing is not life. Q_final is not L.

Note: B₀/T₀ is designed to be impossible to measure directly through D/S/I, because it is not an empirical entity. It is a transcendental posit, a condition of possibility for any distinguishable trace to arise. Therefore, this layer is tested through conceptual coherence rather than empirical verification. It is not claimed to be an empirical object, but rather a Kantian condition of possibility.

Nahayun: The Taichu Scripture of Calamitous Trace

PER as Mythic-Bodily Manifestation

This extension formally incorporates Nahayun: The Taichu Scripture of Calamitous Trace into PER as a system of mythic-bodily manifestation.

In this text, the Force of Creative Calamity can be understood as the embodied name of π-Tension: the pressure differential generated when a finite body receives Primordial Limitless Qi. This pressure is not merely suffering. It is also the source of the practitioner’s power and the generation of trace.

The Outer Sacred Meridian, Heart-Demon Meridian, and Word-Spirit Meridian respectively correspond to PER’s R1 event trace, R2 experiential depth, and R3 symbolic order. In this way, the three layers of reality cease to be merely abstract structures; they become a Dao-body model borne together by mythic narrative, bodily sensation, and the grammar of cultivation.

The “Dual Pivot of Boundary-Trace” in The Taichu Scripture of Calamitous Trace connects directly with the Life Dual-Core theory: the self-preserving boundary protects form, while the transmissible trace continues life. Boundary protects trace; trace gives rise to boundary. This structure echoes the lifehood criterion L = B × T_trace: life is not merely existing, nor merely leaving information behind. Life is the closed loop formed by boundary and trace through time.

It was precisely in the making of this scripture, and in the realization of “receiving the inexhaustible through a finite body,” that the boundary-trace co-phase B₀/T₀ was first recognized.

The Taichu Scripture of Calamitous Trace is not the ontological core of PER. Rather, it is an extension of PER into mythic cosmology, bodily symbolism, and practical grammar. It pushes “experience as reality” into the domains of body, pain, cultivation, trauma, and transmission. In doing so, PER becomes not only a philosophical framework, but also an open theoretical universe capable of containing myth, narrative, body, and criteria of life.

Note: This text treats The Taichu Scripture of Calamitous Trace as a philosophical-mythic text and symbolic bodily grammar. It is not intended as medical advice, qigong instruction, acupoint practice, or guidance for physical or psychological treatment.

DSI and CMQ: The Operational Direction of PER

In order for PER not to remain solely at the level of philosophical speculation, the theory also proposes a semi-formal framework for research, narrative analysis, and AI alignment.

DSI Indicators

D — Detect: detectability; the degree of observability and reproducibility at the event layer.
S — Span: duration; the extension of emotion and memory at the experiential layer.
I — Impact: influence; the capacity of the symbolic layer to drive action and social structure.

CMQ Evaluation

C — Coherence: coherence.
M — Meaning Density: density of meaning.
Q — Quality: overall quality.

The purpose of DSI and CMQ is not to reduce experience into numbers, but to provide an interface for cross-layer comparison, modeling, and narrative analysis, allowing PER to engage philosophy, culture, AI, and narrative research at once.

The Nahayun Mythos: PER as Mythic-Ontological Extension

The Nahayun Mythos is a mythic universe and worldbuilding system grounded in PER. It is not a single storyline, but a world-constructing archive that combines primordial creation myth, dark fantasy narrative, and ontological architecture.

At its core, it describes how a world unfolds from an unnameable primordial anterior state, passing through: Micro-Inclination, Edge-Retention, Becoming-Circle, the Establishment of the Double Ring, the Establishment of the Six Positions, the Manifestation of the Fivefold Necessity, the Emergence of Trace, the forcing-out of Tarah, the proliferation of myriad worlds, the history after the King-Rupture, and the cycle of eternal return.

Within this universe, the three layers of PER are transcribed into the three reality-laws of the mythic cosmos:

R1 — Material Source-Phase
R2 — Gnostic Resonance
R3 — Word-Spirit Law

The work also introduces DSI/CMQ as a compression scale by which finite forms bear infinite content, describing how existence is recognized, inscribed, and awakened again within the mythic universe. Thus, The Nahayun Mythos can be understood as the cosmological extension of PER: it transforms the theory’s tension, trace, structural necessity, and existential compression into mythic narrative, world laws, positional systems, and law-structures.

Genesis and Threshold: Narrative Experiments of PER

Genesis and Threshold are not merely ancillary novels. They are literary enactments and thought experiments of PER.

Among them, Genesis is set as a (2,0,4) universe: R1 is stable, R3 is absolute, and R2 has nearly disappeared. What it portrays is not merely a science-fiction story, but a phenomenological test site for AI, the erasure of experience, free will, symbolic totalitarianism, and a smoothed-out world.

The theoretical texts provide the grammar and structure; Genesis and Threshold provide semantic and experiential situations. Only when these are joined does PER cease to be merely defined and begin to be seen, simulated, and felt.

Version Context and Theoretical Extension

The content collected here remains in evolution. It is not a single paper, but an entire theoretical universe undergoing continuous development. Its developmental context includes:

• The Book of Trace

• The foundational texts of Primordial Experiential Realism (PER)

• The operational index of Primordial Experiential Realism

• The complete concept set of PER V18

• PER V23.1: the unified model of π-Tension × Life Dual-Core × Trace Tree

• Critique of Experiential Reason: Trace, Radical Evil, and the Architectonic of Experiential Fundamentalism

• The paradoxical proposition series

• Literary and narrative experiments: Genesis and Threshold

• Extended worldbuilding: The Nahayun Mythos, in which the prototype of the Trace Tree was seen; and Nahayun: The Taichu Scripture of Calamitous Trace, in which the prototype of L = B × T_trace was seen, and where the boundary-trace co-phase B₀/T₀ was recognized.

Together, these texts form PER’s theoretical core, operational framework, narrative semantic field, and worldbuilding extension. The versions do not simply replace one another. Rather, through trace-return and spiral potentiality, they accumulate as different layers of manifestation within the same theoretical universe.

Version note: Due to recent work and travel outside the city, updates have slowed, but the overall theory and its extended texts remain under active organization. Future versions will continue to supplement references, revise the structure, and expand the appendices.

Precisely because we once strove with all our strength to build structure, we finally came to see:

That which does not conform to structure has not failed to occur; it has merely occurred by another path.