Published March 20, 2026 | Version v1
Publication Open

Virtual Space and New Language Practices: Memes, Slang, and Lexical Transformations

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Ukrainian Language, Institute of Humanities and Social Science, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine
  • 2. Candidate of Philological Sciences, Senior Researcher Fellow, Associate Professor, Department of the Ukrainian language Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine
  • 3. Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Ukrainian Language and Journalism, Faculty of Social and Humanitarian Sciences, Berdyansk State Pedagogical University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
  • 4. Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Ukrainian Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Philology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine
  • 5. Candidate of Philological Sciences, Professor, Head of Department of Slavic and Germanic Philology and Translation, Educational and Scientific Institute of Philology and Journalism, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine

Description

As of 2025, more than 5.2 billion people in the world use social media, which is about 63.9% of the world’s population, with a growth rate of 4.1% over the past 12 months. The most popular platforms are Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter, and WhatsApp. The average time spent on social media is about 2 hours and 26 minutes per day, and the average user has access to seven different platforms. Speech on social media is based on the same language norms (lexical, spelling, grammar, syntax) as live speech. The purpose of the article is to provide an extended analysis of lexical innovations in the language space under the influence of social media and digital communication tools. The object of this study is the modern vocabulary of several languages used within social platforms (Twitter, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram). Particular attention is paid to modern English, which is the most widespread language in communication practice – approximately 1.5 billion people speak English, and 52% of the world’s most popular websites contain English-language content. The article uses scientific and linguistic analysis to investigate the peculiarities of the transformative impact of social media communication on language at all structural and functional levels: lexical, phonetic, grammatical, syntactic and graphic. The article analyzes the characteristic lexical changes by groups – memes, neologisms, abbreviations and acronyms, phraseological units, hashtags. The functions of different categories of lexical innovations of social networks are determined, in particular: hashtags form the basis for unimpeded communication in an intercultural context, neologisms are means of constructing the identity of certain social groups, memes have the functionality of entertainment and information, disseminating precedent information in the format of textual and graphic expression. The negative aspects of the impact of social networks on language are identified: excessive simplification of language and loss of its individual nuances, the emergence of inaccuracies and grammatical errors due to the spontaneous nature of communication on social networks, as well as potential negative consequences for mental health. The study proves that the modern space of innovative language practices reflects new concepts of social media communication culture, interactive upgrading and visualization, which transforms religious and cultural aspects and promotes sustainable language changes.

Files

22362-21921945552-1-SM (1).pdf

Files (376.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a8e95a2f7124f12ea70da326ad0d3e78
376.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

URL
http://erevistas.saber.ula.ve/index.php/lenguayhabla/article/view/22362

Related works

Is supplement to
Publication: http://erevistas.saber.ula.ve/index.php/lenguayhabla/article/view/22362 (URL)

Dates

Available
2026-03-20

References

  • Aisyah, S. 2022. An analysis of slang words used in social media. JournEEL (Journal of English Education and Literature) 4(2). 52-58. https://doi.org/10.51836/journeel.v4i2.354
  • Androutsopoulos, J. 2014. Moments of sharing: Entextualization and linguistic repertoires in social networking. Journal of Pragmatics 73(4). 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.013
  • Barrot, J. S. 2022. Social media as a language learning environment: a systematic review of the literature (2008-2019). Computer assisted language learning 35(9). 2534-2562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1883673
  • Cabré Castellví, M. 2003. Theories of terminology: Their description, prescription and explanation. Terminology 9. 163–199. https://doi.org/10.1075/term.9.2.03cab
  • Calude, A. S. 2025. Linguistics of Social Media: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Languages 10(6). 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10060140
  • Chancellor, S. & De Choudhury, M. 2020. Methods in predictive techniques for mental health status on social media: a critical review. NPJ digital medicine 3(1). 43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0233-7
  • Chernova, O. 2013. Peculiarities of the language of social networks: Japanese. Linguistic and conceptual worldviews 45. 107–111. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Mikks_2013_45_19
  • Davies, J. 2012. Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers and Education 59(1). 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.007
  • Diakiv, V., Koval, O., Kdyrova, I. & Voitenko, I. 2025. The Role of Cultural and Ethnic Identity in Contemporary Media Dynamics: Market Potential and Influence. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia – Serie de Conferencias 4. 1459.
  • Dziubina, O. I. 2016. Communicative aspect of social networks Facebook and Twitter. Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University in Dnipropetrovsk. Series: Philological Sciences 2. 218–222. https://phil.duan.edu.ua/images/PDF/2016/2/32.pdf
  • ElSherief, M., Kulkarni, V., Nguyen, D., Wang, W. Y. & Belding, E. 2018. Hate lingo: A target-based linguistic analysis of hate speech in social media. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Vol. 12, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15041
  • Fubara, S. J. 2020. A pragmatic analysis of the discourse of humour and irony in selected memes on social media. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies 2(2). 76-95. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v2i2.281
  • Ge, J. & Gretzel, U. 2018. Emoji rhetoric: a social media influencer perspective. Journal of marketing management 34(15-16). 1272-1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1483960
  • Hamed, S. M. S. H. 2023. The Impact of Social Media on Linguistic Practices and Cultural Norms. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences 95. 276-295. https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.95.2023.898
  • Herdağdelen, A. & Marelli, M. 2017. Social Media and Language Processing: How Facebook and Twitter Provide the Best Frequency Estimates for Studying Word Recognition. Cognitive Science 41. 976–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12392
  • Hnatyuk, M., Yeshchenko, T., Ivasiuta, M., Vitruk, N. & Kolesnykov, A. 2024. Implementing smart technologies for teaching Ukrainian language across secondary and higher education: case studies and practical recommendations. Multidisciplinary Science Journal 6. 2024ss0716. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0716
  • Hnatyuk M., Diakiv V., Kalashnyk O., Stupnytska H., Sopina O. & Sobol L. 2025. Neurolinguistic Features of the Use of Anglo-American Loanwords in Ukrainian Youth Slang. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience 16(2). 97-105.
  • Jakic A., Wagner, M. & Meyer, A. 2017. The impact of language style accommodation during social media interactions on brand trust. Journal of Service Management 28(3). 418-441. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-12-2016-0325
  • Koliechkin, V., Strunhar, A., Hnatyuk, M., Diakiv, V. & Shmilyk, I. 2025. Management information-communication technologies in modern political conflicts: An analysis of their impact on society. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management 10(7s). 76–84. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i7s.782
  • Kostyk, Y., Bakhov, I., Shum, O., Hnatyuk, M. & Nikitina, N. 2025. The Influence of Globalization on Language Practices: the Role of Anglicisms and Multilingual Blending in Modern Texts. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion 7(SI1). 177–192. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.160
  • Kramsch, C. 2014. Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal 98(1). 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12057.x
  • Lantz-Andersson, A. 2018. Language play in a second language: Social media as contexts for emerging Sociopragmatic competence. Education and Information Technologies 23. 705-724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9631-0.
  • Mukhtar, S., Ayyaz, Q. U. A., Khan, S., Bhopali, A. M. N., Sajid, M. K. M. & Babbar, A. W. 2024. Memes in the digital age: A sociolinguistic examination of cultural expressions and communicative practices across border. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 30(6). 1443-1455. Doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5520
  • Page, R., Barton, D., Lee, C., Unger, J. W. & Zappavigna, M. 2022. Researching language and social media: A student guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003121763
  • Pezzuti, T., Leonhardt, J. M. & Warren, C. 2021. Certainty in language increases consumer engagement on social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing 53(1). 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.06.005
  • Rahmatdildaevna Kurmanbekova, Z., Sarekenova, K. K., Oner, M., Turarbekovich Malikov, K. & Sagatovna Shokabayeva, S. 2023. A linguistic analysis of social network communication. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language 11(1). 119-132. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2023.1972010.2824
  • Reinhardt, J. 2019. Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching 52(1). 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000356
  • Rueger, J., Dolfsma, W. & Aalbers, R. 2023. Mining and analysing online social networks: Studying the dynamics of digital peer support. MethodsX 10. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102005
  • Sardinha, T. B. 2022. Corpus linguistics and the study of social media: A case study using multi-dimensional analysis. In The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics, 656-674. Routledge.
  • Schwartz, H., Eichstaedt, J., Kern ML, Dziurzynski, L., Ramones, S. & Agrawal, M. 2013. Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The OpenVocabulary Approach. PLoS ONE 8(9). 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073791
  • Seargeant, P. & Tagg, C. 2014. The Language of Social Media. Identity and Community on the Internet. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317
  • Social Media Use in 2018. 2018. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social–media–use–in–2018/
  • Sun, Z., Anbarasan, M. & Praveen Kumar, D. J. C. I. (2021a). Design of online intelligent English teaching platform based on artificial intelligence techniques. Computational Intelligence 37(3). 1166-1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12351
  • Sun, Y., Wang, G. & Feng, H. (2021b). Linguistic studies on social media: A bibliometric analysis. Sage Open 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047572
  • Sundaram, A., Subramaniam, H., Ab Hamid, S. H. & Nor, A. M. 2023. A systematic literature review on social media slang analytics in contemporary discourse. IEEE Access 11. 132457-132471. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3334278
  • Wei, L. 2020. Multilingual English users' linguistic innovation. World Englishes 39(2). 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12457