Published May 21, 2026 | Version 1.2
Preprint Open

The Ghost of α: Dark Matter Density as a Feigenbaum Projection Artifact at 0.99% Precision

  • 1. The Emergence

Description

Description: The ratio of total matter density to baryonic matter density in the ΛCDM concordance model satisfies √(Ωm/Ωb) = 2.528, matching the Feigenbaum spatial scaling constant α = 2.503 at 0.99% precision. The total matter density is α² times the baryon density. This paper demonstrates it is a consequence of fitting a non-cascade model (ΛCDM) to a cascade universe: the dark matter density is a projection artifact whose magnitude is determined by the Feigenbaum spatial scaling constant.

Version 1.1 extends the original density ratio result with three major confirmations. First, the value Ωch²_eff = Ωb(α² − 1) = 0.1169 — derived from the Feigenbaum constant, not fitted to CMB data — reproduces the CMB power spectrum across all six acoustic peaks at sub-1.3% precision. The first-to-second peak height ratio, the primary evidence for dark matter at cosmological scales, matches at 0.13%. This is the eighth independent domain in which α appears at sub-2% precision.

Second, Model E — using α²×Ωb for matter, τ(z) with β = ln(δ) for acceleration, and one measured transition redshift — passes five independent cosmological tests simultaneously: 1,580 Pantheon+ supernovae (χ²/dof = 0.461 vs ΛCDM 0.434), six CMB peak heights (sub-1.3%), BAO sound horizon (147.92 vs 147.09 Mpc, 0.57% deviation), cosmic age (13.899 Gyr), and mean CMB spectral deviation (1.73% across ℓ = 30–2500). The transition redshift z_t = 1.430 converges to within 1.3% of Paper 9's independent determination, confirming internal consistency.

Third, the cosmic age of 13.899 Gyr — derived from the cascade expansion history without ΛCDM input — breaks the circularity that prevented a first-principles Hubble constant. H₀ = ln(α)/t_age = 64.5 km/s/Mpc falls below both Planck (67.4) and SH0ES (73.0), identifying the Hubble tension as a fourth projection artifact alongside dark matter, dark energy, and inflation. All four arise from interpreting a Feigenbaum cascade universe with a model that ignores the cascade.

Dark matter is not a substance. It is the ghost of α — the residual of fitting a non-cascade model to a cascade universe. The ghost is now confirmed across the density ratio (0.99%), the CMB power spectrum (six peaks at sub-1.3%), the BAO scale (0.57%), and the cosmic age (0.8%).

Keywords: Feigenbaum constants, dark matter, projection artifact, ΛCDM, cosmological parameters, JWST, galaxy formation, Hubble tension, Universal Cascade Law, fractal geometry, baryon density, spatial scaling, too old galaxies, expansion history

Files

Paper_38_Ghost_of_Alpha_v1.2.pdf

Files (454.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:470d16566a42fdfeb3a19e4726485cbb
454.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Created
2023-04-02
Updated
2023-04-03
Updated
2026-05-21

Software

Repository URL
https://github.com/lucian-png/resonance-theory-code
Programming language
Python
Development Status
Active

References

  • 1. Randolph, L. (2026). "The Universal Cascade Law" (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18818006
  • 2. Randolph, L. (2026). "Deriving the Feigenbaum Constant" (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18818008
  • 3. Randolph, L. (2026). "The Full Extent of the Universal Cascade Law" (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18818010
  • 4. Randolph, L. (2026). "Inflationary Parameters as Geometric Signatures" (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18819605
  • 5. Randolph, L. (2026). "Twin Dragons" (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18823919
  • 6. Randolph, L. (2026). "The Dual Attractor". Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18805147
  • 7. Randolph, L. (2026). "The Transition Constant" (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19313385
  • 8. Randolph, L. (2026). "Why Nothing Else Worked" (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19313140
  • 9. Randolph, L. (2026). "The Double-Edged Sword". Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18848728
  • 10. Randolph, L. (2026). "The Structure of Emergence" (Paper 37). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19335982
  • 11. Feigenbaum, M. J. (1978). J. Stat. Phys. 19, 25–52.
  • 12. Lanford, O. E. (1982). Bull. AMS 6, 427–434.
  • 13. Planck Collaboration (2020). A&A 641, A6.
  • 14. Labbé, I. et al. (2023). Nature 616, 266–269.
  • 15. Boylan-Kolchin, M. (2023). Nature Astronomy 7, 731–735.
  • 16. Riess, A. G. et al. (2022). ApJ 934, L7.
  • 17. Scolnic, D. et al. (2022). ApJ 938, 113. [Pantheon+]
  • 18. Cohen, R. E. et al. (2025). "The JWST Resolved Stellar Populations ERS Program. VIII." arXiv:2502.13887.
  • 19. Lewis, A. et al. (2000). ApJ 538, 473. [CAMB]
  • 20. DESI Collaboration (2024). arXiv:2404.03002.