PRH | Aux | 4.1 • A Finite, Auditable Certificate for Chess Fairness via Blur
Authors/Creators
Description
We formalize a conditional and auditable route to certifying that perfect-play chess is fair up to an explicit tolerance. The method introduces a small positive blur operator $K_t$ on the finite chess state graph, defines a simple draw-oriented imbalance potential $\Phi \in[0,1]$ from local features (king box, pawn shield, loose pieces, safe mobility), and then replaces $\Phi$ by a shifted Lyapunov observable
$$
\Psi_\delta=\frac{\delta+\Phi}{1+\delta}
$$
which avoids the degeneracy at $\Phi=0$ and is the actual control quantity in the proofs.
We impose a Top-n Good-Move Gap (GMG) condition: after a short opening prefix, every reachable non-absorbing position admits at least one of its Top- $n$ moves whose worst-case two-ply blurred expectation of $\Psi_\delta$ contracts by a fixed factor $1-\gamma$. From this we derive a weighted sup-norm spectral gap for the non-absorbing two-ply kernel, a discounted Bellman contraction, and an exponential finite-horizon decay for the residual blurred risk
$$
\operatorname{Risk}_{N, t} \sim(1-\gamma)^N
$$
This finite-horizon object is deliberately phrased in terms of blurred expectation rather than exact sharp-chess mate probability.
To make the hypothesis auditable at scale, we add a tightening framework based on: (a) $\varepsilon$-nets in feature space, (b) certified interval upper envelopes for reply classes, (c) dominance pruning at the level of these envelopes, and (d) adaptive refinement near the threshold. Under standard deblurring and discount-removal consistency assumptions, an audited discounted blurred value transfers to an explicit tolerance bound for the sharp value.
Files
Additional details
Additional titles
- Subtitle
- Two-Ply Control, Weighted Spectral Gaps, and Scalable Tightening by ε-Nets and Interval Pruning
References
- E. Zermelo, "Über eine Anwendung der Mengenlehre auf die Theorie des Schachspiels," in Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Mathematicians, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1913.
- A. S. Fraenkel and D. Lichtenstein, "Computing a perfect strategy for n × n chess requires time exponential in n," J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 31(2), 199–214 (1981).
- L. V. Allis, Searching for Solutions in Games and Artificial Intelligence, PhD thesis, Univ. of Limburg, 1994.
- H. J. van den Herik, J. W. H. M. Uiterwijk, and J. van Rijswijck, "Games solved: Now and in the near future," Artificial Intelligence 134(1–2), 277–311 (2002).
- J. Schaeffer, N. Burch, Y. Björnsson, A. Kishimoto, M. Müller, R. Lake, P. Lu, and S. Sutphen, "Checkers is solved," Science 317(5844), 1518–1522 (2007).
- L. S. Shapley, "Stochastic games," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 39(10), 1095–1100 (1953).
- D. Blackwell, "Discrete dynamic programming," Ann. Math. Stat. 33(2), 719–726 (1962).
- J.-F. Mertens and A. Neyman, "Stochastic games," Int. J. Game Theory 10(2), 53–66 (1981).
- M. L. Puterman, Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming, Wiley, 1994.
- J. A. Filar and K. Vrieze, Competitive Markov Decision Processes, Springer, 1997.
- S. P. Meyn and R. L. Tweedie, Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability, 2nd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009.
- E. Seneta, Non-Negative Matrices and Markov Chains, Springer, 2006.
- R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, 2nd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012.
- R. E. Moore, Interval Analysis, Prentice-Hall, 1966.
- A. Neumaier, Interval Methods for Systems of Equations, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.
- W. Tucker, Validated Numerics: A Short Introduction to Rigorous Computations, Princeton Univ. Press, 2011.
- T. C. Hales et al., "A formal proof of the Kepler conjecture," Forum of Mathematics, Pi 5, e2 (2017).
- D. E. Knuth and R. W. Moore, "An analysis of alpha–beta pruning," Artificial Intelligence 6(4), 293–326 (1975).
- A. Plaat, J. Schaeffer, W. Pijls, and A. de Bruin, "Best-first fixed-depth minimax algorithms," Artificial Intelligence 87(1–2), 255–293 (1996).
- D. Silver, T. Hubert, J. Schrittwieser, I. Antonoglou, M. Lai, A. Guez, M. Lanctot, L. Sifre, D. Kumaran, T. Graepel, T. Lillicrap, K. Simonyan, and D. Hassabis, "A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and go through self-play," Science 362(6419), 1140–1144 (2018).