Performance Analysis and Economic Assessment of Grid-Tied Solar Photovoltaic Systems with MPPT Optimisation in Semi-Arid Indian Climates
Authors/Creators
Description
India's solar energy trajectory, anchored by the 500 GW renewable capacity target by 2030 under the National Solar Mission, requires rapid deployment of grid-tied photovoltaic systems across diverse climatic zones. Rajasthan's semi-arid belt — receiving annual global horizontal irradiance (GHI) exceeding 5.8 kWh/m²/day on average — represents India's highest-potential solar resource zone, yet systematic comparative studies of PV module technology performance, MPPT algorithm efficiency, and techno-economic viability under actual field conditions remain sparse relative to the deployment scale the region demands. This study presents a twelve-month field performance investigation of three PV module technologies (monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, and CdTe thin-film) at a 10 kWp grid-tied test facility in Jodhpur, Rajasthan, combined with simulation-based comparison of five MPPT algorithms and economic analysis of system sizing from 0.5 kWp to 100 kWp.
Key findings include: monocrystalline modules deliver highest annual energy yield (1,742 kWh/kWp) but exhibit greater thermal derating losses during peak summer; thin-film CdTe shows superior temperature coefficient performance (−0.22%/°C versus −0.41%/°C for monocrystalline) that narrows the annual yield gap in high-temperature months. The Perturb-and-Observe MPPT algorithm converges to maximum power point within 4.2 ms, outperforming fixed-voltage control by 7.3% in annual energy capture under fluctuating irradiance conditions. LCOE analysis establishes economic viability from 3 kWp onwards (LCOE ₹6.8/kWh versus grid purchase at ₹8.4/kWh) with project IRR exceeding 14% for systems above 10 kWp under current subsidy frameworks
Files
IJAEAMARV26V3A0319.pdf
Files
(583.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:d6b21f5b1ffa7d7f320e33b6ae0f5239
|
583.4 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Issued
-
2026-03-25India's solar energy trajectory, anchored by the 500 GW renewable capacity target by 2030 under the National Solar Mission, requires rapid deployment of grid-tied photovoltaic systems across diverse climatic zones. Rajasthan's semi-arid belt — receiving annual global horizontal irradiance (GHI) exceeding 5.8 kWh/m²/day on average — represents India's highest-potential solar resource zone, yet systematic comparative studies of PV module technology performance, MPPT algorithm efficiency, and techno-economic viability under actual field conditions remain sparse relative to the deployment scale the region demands. This study presents a twelve-month field performance investigation of three PV module technologies (monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, and CdTe thin-film) at a 10 kWp grid-tied test facility in Jodhpur, Rajasthan, combined with simulation-based comparison of five MPPT algorithms and economic analysis of system sizing from 0.5 kWp to 100 kWp. Key findings include: monocrystalline modules deliver highest annual energy yield (1,742 kWh/kWp) but exhibit greater thermal derating losses during peak summer; thin-film CdTe shows superior temperature coefficient performance (−0.22%/°C versus −0.41%/°C for monocrystalline) that narrows the annual yield gap in high-temperature months. The Perturb-and-Observe MPPT algorithm converges to maximum power point within 4.2 ms, outperforming fixed-voltage control by 7.3% in annual energy capture under fluctuating irradiance conditions. LCOE analysis establishes economic viability from 3 kWp onwards (LCOE ₹6.8/kWh versus grid purchase at ₹8.4/kWh) with project IRR exceeding 14% for systems above 10 kWp under current subsidy frameworks
References
- [1] Bhatt, U., & Karnatak, H. C. (2023). Solar photovoltaic energy in India: Status and future directions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 171, 113084. [2] Bergström, L., & Lindqvist, A. (2022). Comparative module technology performance: Nordic vs tropical site analysis. Progress in Photovoltaics, 30(8), 812-826. [3] Esram, T., & Chapman, P. L. (2007). Comparison of photovoltaic array MPPT techniques. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 22(2), 439-449. [4] Hammoumi, A. E., et al. (2022). Simple and efficient theoretical approach to design and control PV systems. Scientific Reports, 12, 14198. [5] IEA. (2024). Renewables 2023: Analysis and Forecast to 2028. International Energy Agency, Paris. [6] Jordehi, A. R. (2016). Maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 33-45. [7] MNRE. (2024). Annual Report 2023-24. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India. [8] Nambiar, P., & Solanski, V. (2023). Field performance of monocrystalline PV in Rajasthan semi-arid conditions. Solar Energy, 261, 244-256. [9] Ogunjuyigbe, A. S. O., et al. (2015). Analysis of solar PV under partial shading using MATLAB. Journal of Electrical Systems and IT, 2(1), 56-68. [10] Tiwari, R. S., & Singh, A. (2022). Techno-economic analysis of rooftop PV under PM-KUSUM scheme. Energy for Sustainable Development, 68, 312-324. [11] Virtuani, A., & Fesharaki, J. J. (2014). CdTe module performance in extreme temperature conditions. Thin Solid Films, 562, 487-492. [12] Yazdani, A., & Dash, P. P. (2009). Unified model and control of PV systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 56(5), 1732-1741.