Architecting Accountability: A Layered Enterprise Data Governance Model for Regulated Industries
Authors/Creators
Description
Regulated industries such as healthcare, financial services, pharmaceuticals, energy, and public administration operate within highly controlled environments defined by statutory mandates, supervisory oversight, and strict audit requirements. As enterprise ecosystems become increasingly data-driven characterized by exponential growth in structured and unstructured information, distributed cloud infrastructures, real-time analytics, and cross-border data transfers traditional IT governance approaches prove inadequate for ensuring end-to-end accountability, transparency, and regulatory compliance. Enterprise data governance must therefore evolve beyond technical control mechanisms to incorporate board-level oversight, clearly defined decision rights, formal stewardship structures, policy lifecycle management, architectural integration, and measurable compliance monitoring. This paper synthesizes established enterprise data governance frameworks, including ISO/IEC 38505-1, the DAMA Data Management Body of Knowledge (DMBOK), and the Data Governance Institute (DGI) framework, to develop a cohesive model suited to regulated environments. By integrating strategic governance principles, operational data management disciplines, and programmatic stewardship constructs, we propose a structured enterprise governance approach that aligns oversight with execution. The study emphasizes governance lifecycle alignment, stewardship accountability, compliance traceability, audit defensibility, and risk-based control integration as foundational pillars for building resilient, scalable, and sustainable enterprise data governance capabilities in regulated industries.
Files
EJAET-7-1-95-103.pdf
Files
(451.0 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:9fa19a7dcfe17ca5da8ca2dfc8e4e302
|
451.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- [1]. Weber, K., Otto, B., & Österle, H. (2009). One size does not fit all A contingency approach to data governance. Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/1515693.1515696
- [2]. Khatri, V., & Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1629175.1629210
- [3]. Alhassan, I., Sammon, D., & Daly, M. (2016). Data governance activities: An analysis of the literature. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2016.1187397
- [4]. Even, A., & Shankaranarayanan, G. (2007). Utility-driven assessment of data quality. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240616.1240623
- [5]. Guetat, S. B. A. (2015). The architecture facet of information governance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.564
- [6]. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
- [7]. Srikanth Chakravarthy Vankayala. (2016). Designing Data-Driven Automation Frameworks for Enterprise Systems: A Scalable Architecture for Continuous Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17838634
- [8]. Madhava Rao Thota. (2019). Advancing Mission-Critical Data Platforms Through Predictive Observability and Autonomous Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18083069
- [9]. Brous, P., Janssen, M., Vilminko-Heikkinen, R. (2016). Coordinating Decision-Making in Data Management Activities: A Systematic Review of Data Governance Principles. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_9
- [10]. Santhosh Reddy BasiReddy. (2017). Data Hygiene and Batch Optimization in Enterprise CRM: A 2017 Framework for Scalable, High-Quality Customer Data Integration. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 4(11), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18084894
- [11]. Armbrust, M., et al. (2016). Apache Spark: A unified engine for big data processing. Communications of the ACM, 59(11), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/2934664
- [12]. Otto, B. (2011). Organizing data governance: Findings from the telecommunications industry and consequences for large service providers. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(3), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02903
- [13]. Otto, B. (2015). Quality and value of the data resource in large enterprises. Information Systems Management, 32(3), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2015.1044344
- [14]. Nurminen, P. (2017). Effective corporate data quality management: systematic literature review. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/items/34db17c2-f640-4496-9d96-4991bbbafa3b
- [15]. Nwaimo, C. S., Oluoha, O. M., & Oyedokun, O. Y. E. W. A. L. E. (2019). Big data analytics: technologies, applications, and future prospects. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(11), 411-419. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chioma-Nwaimo/publication/393658903