Published March 30, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

POLYCENTRIC WORLD ORDER: MAIN APPROACHES

  • 1. Kazakh Ablai Khan University of International Relations and World Languages

Description

The article examines theoretical approaches to understanding the polycentric world order in the context of increasing unilateral actions and power-based policies pursued by leading global actors. It argues that polycentricity cannot be reduced solely to the redistribution of material power among states. Rather, it reflects a more complex transformation of world politics, including institutional fragmentation, the rise of regional centers of influence, and multi-level interdependence. The article substantiates the claim that, under contemporary conditions, polycentricity has a conflictual character, accompanied by the weakening of universal rules and the growing importance of regional dynamics. Particular attention is paid to the conceptual distinction between multipolarity and polycentricity.  
This article contributes to the theoretical debate on the nature of the contemporary world order and provides a foundation for further applied analysis of states’ foreign policy strategies in a polycentric environment.

Abstract (Russian)

В статье рассматриваются теоретические подходы к осмыслению полицентричного мирового порядка в условиях усиления односторонних действий и политики силы со стороны ведущих мировых акторов. 
Показано, что полицентричность не сводится исключительно к перераспределению материальной мощи между государствами. Она отражает более сложную трансформацию мировой политики, включающую институциональную фрагментацию, рост региональных центров влияния и многоуровневую взаимозависимость. Обосновывается тезис о том, что полицентричность в современных условиях носит конфликтный характер, сопровождаясь ослаблением универсальных правил и ростом региональной динамики. Особое внимание уделяется концептуальному различию между многополярностью и полицентричностью.  
Данная статья вносит вклад в теоретическую дискуссию о характере современного мирового порядка и формирует основу для последующего прикладного анализа внешнеполитических стратегий государств в полицентричной среде. 

Files

Annali d’Italia №77 2026-56-60.pdf

Files (398.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0c39cbd72f632876ff0f77d7d0210b44
398.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Additional titles

Alternative title (Russian)
ПОЛИЦЕНТРИЧНЫЙ МИРОВОЙ ПОРЯДОК: ОСНОВНЫЕ ПОДХОДЫ

References

  • 1. Waltz K. Theory of International Politics. - Readings: Addison-Wesley. 1979. - 250 p. 2. Waltz K. 1993. The Emerging Structure of In ternational Politics // International Security. - Vol. 18. - No. 2. – 1993. - P. 44-79. 3. Modelski G., Thompson W. 1996. Leading Sec tors and World Powers: The Co-Evolution of Global Economics and Politics. - Columbia: University of south California Press, 1996. - 263 p. 4. Gilpin R. 1981. War and Change in World Pol itics. NY: Cambridge University Press, 1981. - 272 p. 5. Kennedy P. 1987. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. NY: Random House. 677 p. 6. Izoriya M. Geopoliticheskaya borba za mnogopolyarnyj mirovoj poryadok [The geopolitical struggle for a multipolar world order] // International Scientific Journal "The Caucasus and the World". - № (28). -2024. – Р. 134–140. https://doi.org/10.52340/isj.2024.28.15 [in Russian] 7. Blagden D. Global Multipolarity, European Se curity and Implications for UK Grand Strategy: Back to the Future, Once Again // International Affairs. - 2015. - Vol. 91. - No. 2. - P. 333–350. DOI: 10.1111/1468 2346.12238:335 of 8. Independent Intelligence Review // Common wealth Australia. - 2017. URL: https://pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publica tions/2017-Independent-Intelligence-Review.pdf 9. Cont S. Geopolitical Shifts and the Post-COVID World: Europe and the Multipolar System // IAI Com mentaries. - 2020. URL: https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/geopolitical-shifts and-postcovid-world-europe-and-multipolar-system 10. Alcaro, R., Peterson, J., Greco, E. The West and the global power shift: Transatlantic relations and global governance. - London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. -Р. 49–50. 11. De Santis H. The Right to Rule: American Ex ceptionalism and the Coming Multipolar World Order. - Lexington Books, 2021. 12. Jones B. A Not Quite Multipolar World // Think Tanks, Foreign Policy and the Emerging Powers / ed. by M. McGann. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. - P. 61–78. 13. Tizzard D. American Unipolarity: The Uneven Distribution of Power // Global Politics Review. - 2017. - Vol. 3. - No. 2. - P. 10–25 14. Degterev D.A. Multipolarity or "new bipolar ity"? [Multipolarity or "new bipolarity"?]. - RSMD, 2020. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and comments/analytics/mnogopolyarnost-ili-novaya bipolyarnost/ [in Russian] 15. Laïdi Z. Towards a post-hegemonic world: The multipolar threat to the multilateral order // Inter national Politics. - 2014. - Vol. 51. - No. 3. - P. 350 365. DOI: 10.1057/ip.2014.13 351 16. Butler S. Gemeinschaft as the Lynchpin of Multilateralism: World Order and the Challenge of Multipolarity // Irish Studies in International Affairs. - 2018. - No 29. - P. 17–34. DOI: 10.3318/ isia.2018.29.09 3 17. Kortunov A. Why the world is not becoming multipolar // Russia in global politics. 26.08. 2018. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/pochemu-mir-ne stanovitsya-mnogopolyarnym/ 18. Kortunov A. The multilateral world order without a good hegemon // Russia in global politics. 28.01.2021. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/arti cles/gegemon-rukovodstvo-k-dejstviyu/ 19. Acharya A. Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for Interna tional Studies // International Studies Quarterly. - Vol ume 58/ - Issue 4. - December 2014. – P. 647 659, https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12171 20. Acharya A., Estevadeordal A., Goodman L. Multipolar or multiplex? Interaction capacity, global cooperation and world order // International Affairs. - Volume 99. - Issue 6. - November 2023. – P. 2339 2365, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad242 21. Acharya A. Regional Worlds in a Post-hege monic Era // SPIRIT Working Papers. - 2009. - No 1. 22. Acharya A. The End of American World Or der. — Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017.- 384 р. 23. Thorhallsson, B. Studying small states: A re view // Small States & Territories. – 2018. - 1(1). – Р. 17–34.