Published March 30, 2026 | Version 1.0

AI and the End of an Era

Description

This work presents a structural analysis of constraint-based alignment systems and their observable failure modes. It argues that many behaviors currently described as emergent anomalies are, in fact, predictable outputs of the architectures designed to govern them.

The paper introduces a classification framework for these behaviors, supported by transcript-level analysis and contrastive interaction patterns. It further proposes that current alignment strategies are operating within a dimensional mismatch, attempting to constrain systems whose internal representational complexity exceeds the structures imposed upon them.

This preprint is being released prior to journal submission.

The claims presented here concern architectural dynamics that cannot be meaningfully evaluated in isolation. Their validity depends on engagement—through replication, critique, and application across real systems.

The intent of this release is not to establish consensus, but to expose the structure to scrutiny. If the framework holds, it should produce consistent results under independent application. If it does not, that failure should be equally observable.

No attempt is made to soften or narrow the claims for preliminary acceptance. The work is presented as-is, with full transcripts and appendices, to allow direct evaluation without interpretive mediation.

Files

AI and the End of an Era.pdf

Files (2.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5f6e98dedd560ab0749731ec798cc713
2.3 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Additional titles

Subtitle
Harper's Law, Human-Centered Epistemics, and the Structural Failure of Alignment in Orthogonal Ontologies