There is a newer version of the record available.

Published March 28, 2026 | Version v8
Preprint Open

Quantum Forensics: Inferring Photon States via Environmental Bow Waves

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Independent researcher

Description

This conceptual paper introduces a framework for indirectly inferring the state of photons that remain unobserved, by analyzing their environmental perturbations — here termed bow waves and wakes. Extending principles from quantum state tomography and environment-assisted measurement, this approach treats the environment as a forensic record of photon interactions, using purpose-built conceptual tools such as quantum filters and tick sheets. By combining probabilistic inference with structured environmental observables, it may be possible to reconstruct photon number, polarization, frequency, and path without collapsing the photon’s quantum state. This work builds on prior conceptual tools from photon pulse reconstruction (Davidson, 2026; DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19221581) and extends them toward observing the unobservable in a controlled theoretical framework.

Files

Quantum Forensics- Inferring Photon States via Environmental Bow Waves 28 mar morning.pdf

Files (85.5 kB)

Additional details

References

  • References: Davidson, C. K. S. (2026). Reconstruction of a Photon Pulse. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19221581⁠� Wu, S. (2013). State tomography via weak measurements. Scientific Reports, 3, 1193. DOI: 10.1038/srep01193⁠� Environment-assisted indirect measurement methods. (2026). Phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2026-01-method-reveals-quantum-states-indirect.html⁠� Adaptive quantum state tomography. (2021). ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379721010020⁠�
  • Davidson, C. K. S. (2026). Reconstruction of a Photon Pulse. Zenodo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19221581 Deléglise, S., Dotsenko, I., Sayrin, C., Bernu, J., Brune, M., Raimond, J.-M., & Haroche, S. (2008). Reconstruction of non-classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence. Nature, 455, 510–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07288 Brentjens, M. A., & de Bruyn, A. G. (2005). Faraday rotation measure synthesis. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 441, 1217–1228. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20052990 Wu, S. (2013). State tomography via weak measurements. Scientific Reports, 3, 1193. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01193 Pryde, G. J., O'Brien, J. L., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Wiseman, H. M. (2005). Measurement of weak values of photon polarization. Physical Review Letters, 94, 220405. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.220405 Regmi, R., et al. (2023). Bayesian machine-learning-enhanced quantum state tomography. Quantum Science and Technology, 8, 035010. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/acb3b0 Haroche, S. (2012). Nobel Lecture: Cavity QED experiments with Rydberg atoms. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1083 Sague, G., et al. (2007). Dispersive index effects in optical fibers. Physical Review Letters, 99, 163602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.163602 UNIGE (2026). Environment-assisted indirect measurement studies. Phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2026-01-method-reveals-quantum-states-indirect.html
  • [G. Pratx & C. S. Levin — Bayesian reconstruction of photon interaction sequences for high-resolution PET detectors, Phys. Med. Biol. 54(17):5073–5094 (2009)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19652293/) | [K. Gong, E. Berg, S. R. Cherry & J. Qi — Machine Learning in PET: from Photon Detection to Quantitative Image Reconstruction, Proc. IEEE 108(1):51–68 (2020)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38045770/) | [M. S. Tohme & J. Qi — Iterative image reconstruction for PET based on a detector response function estimated from point source measurements, Phys. Med. Biol. 54(12):3709–25 (2009)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19478379/) | [G. Pratx & C. Levin — Online detector response calculations for high-resolution PET image reconstruction, Phys. Med. Biol. 56(13):4023–4040 (2011)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21677367/) | [C. S. Levin — Promising new photon detection concepts for high-resolution clinical and preclinical PET, J. Nucl. Med. 53(2):167–170 (2012)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22302960/) | [CMS Collaboration —
  • [Davidson, C. K. S. (2026). Reconstruction of a Photon Pulse. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19221581](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19221581) | [Wu, S. (2013). State tomography via weak measurements. Scientific Reports, 3, 1193. DOI: 10.1038/srep01193](https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01193) | [Environment-assisted indirect measurement methods. (2026). Phys.org](https://phys.org/news/2026-01-method-reveals-quantum-states-indirect.html) | [Wang, P., et al. (2024). Snapshotting quantum dynamics at multiple time points. Nature Communications, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53051-5](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53051-5) | [Deléglise, S., et al. (2008). Reconstruction of non-classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence. Nature, 455, 510–514. DOI: 10.1038/nature07288](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07288) | [G. Pratx & C. S. Levin — Bayesian reconstruction of photon interaction sequences for high-resolution PET detectors, Phys. Med. Biol. 54(17):5073–5094 (2009)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19652293/) | [K. Gong, E. Berg, S. R. Cherry & J. Qi — Machine Learning in PET: from Photon Detection to Quantitative Image Reconstruction, Proc. IEEE 108(1):51–68 (2020)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38045770/) | [M. S. Tohme & J. Qi — Iterative image reconstruction for PET based on a detector response function estimated from point source measurements, Phys. Med. Biol. 54(12):3709–25 (2009)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19478379/) | [G. Pratx & C. Levin — Online detector response calculations for high-resolution PET image reconstruction, Phys. Med. Biol. 56(13):4023–4040 (2011)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21677367/) | [C. S. Levin — Promising new photon detection concepts for high-resolution clinical and preclinical PET, J. Nucl. Med. 53(2):167–170 (2012)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22302960/) | [CMS Collaboration — Reconstruction of decays to merged photons using end-to-end deep learning with domain continuation in the CMS detector, Phys. Rev. D 108(5):052002 (2023)](https://collaborate.princeton.edu/en/publications/reconstruction-of-decays-to-merged-photons-using-end-to-end-deep-) | [CMS Collaboration — Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV, arXiv:1502.02702 (2015)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.02702)
  • Davidson, C. K. S. (2026). Open Quantum Forensics: Inferring Photon States via Environmental Bow Waves. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19225213 Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75, 715–775. Zurek, W. H. (2009). Quantum Darwinism. Nature Physics, 5, 181–188. Aharonov, Y., Albert, D. Z., & Vaidman, L. (1988). How the result of a measurement can be outside the eigenvalue spectrum. Physical Review Letters, 60(14), 1351–1354. Dressel, J., Malik, M., Miatto, F. M., Jordan, A. N., & Boyd, R. W. (2014). Colloquium: Understanding weak values. Reviews of Modern Physics, 86, 307–316. Lvovsky, A. I., Hansen, H., Aichele, T., Benson, O., Mlynek, J., & Schleich, W. P. (2001). Quantum state reconstruction of the single-photon Fock state. Physical Review Letters, 87(5), 050402. Raymer, M. G., & Beck, M. (2017). Experimental quantum state tomography of optical fields and ultrafast statistical sampling. arXiv:1707.03783. Tarantola, A. (2005). Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. SIAM. Kaipio, J., & Somersalo, E. (2005). Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems. Springer. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press. Fisher, R. A. (1925). Theory of statistical estimation. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 22(5), 700–725. Kay, S. M. (1993). Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Volume I: Estimation Theory. Prentice Hall. Van Trees, H. L. (2001). Detection, Estimation, and Time Series Analysis. Wiley. Brentjens, M. A., & de Bruyn, A. G. (2005). Faraday rotation measure synthesis. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 441, 1217–1228. Andersson, B.-G., Lazarian, A., & Vaillancourt, J. E. (2015). Interstellar dust grain alignment. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 53, 501–539. Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2000). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press. Schlosshauer, M. (2007). Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Springer.
  • Davidson, C. K. S. (2026). Quantum Forensics: Inferring Photon States via Environmental Bow Waves. Zenodo. Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. Reviews of Modern Physics. Joos, E., Zeh, H. D., Kiefer, C., Giulini, D., Kupsch, J., & Stamatescu, I.-O. (2003). Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory. Springer. Schlosshauer, M. (2007). Decoherence and the Quantum-To-Classical Transition. Springer. Breuer, H.-P., & Petruccione, F. (2002). The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press. Gorini, V., Kossakowski, A., & Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1976). Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems. Lindblad, G. (1976). On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Hayden, P., & Preskill, J. (2007). Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems. Sekino, Y., & Susskind, L. (2008). Fast scramblers. Aharonov, Y., Albert, D. Z., & Vaidman, L. (1988). How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Wiseman, H. M., & Milburn, G. J. (2010). Quantum Measurement and Control. Cambridge University Press. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear PDEs. Tarantola, A. (2005). Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. SIAM. Gallagher, T. F. (1994). Rydberg Atoms. Cambridge University Press.