Published February 27, 2026 | Version v1
Publication Open

Customer Experiences with Airline Refunds: An Analysis of Procedures, Challenges, and Policy Implications

  • 1. Oman Tourism College
  • 2. Research Scholar, India

Description

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to analyse the existing procedures and policies governing airfare refunds across airlines; to identify the key challenges faced by customers during the airfare refund process, including issues related to intermediaries, and to examine customer satisfaction levels with respect to airfare refunds and associated procedures.

Design/methodology/approach: The study employed a quantitative research design to examine customer experiences with airline refund procedures and their impact on satisfaction. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms to airline passengers, primarily in Muscat. A total of 76 responses were obtained. The instrument measured booking behaviour, refund awareness, perceived challenges, and satisfaction levels. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were applied to analyse relationships and test significance.

Findings: The findings reveal significant procedural challenges in airline refund processes, particularly in communication, transparency, and interpretation of airline rules. Although respondents ultimately reported moderate satisfaction after receiving refunds, the process itself was perceived as complex and inefficient. The results highlight a communication gap between airlines, intermediaries, and customers, underscoring the need for clearer policy dissemination and improved coordination to enhance customer trust and overall service experience.

Research Implications: This study contributes to service management and airline industry literature by identifying structural communication gaps in refund procedures. It advances understanding of how transparency, intermediary roles, and procedural fairness influence customer perceptions. The findings provide a foundation for future research on regulatory frameworks, digital refund systems, and consumer protection mechanisms within the aviation sector.

Social Implications: The study emphasizes the importance of transparent and fair refund practices in safeguarding passenger rights. Improved communication and simplified procedures can reduce financial uncertainty and enhance public trust in the airline industry. Strengthening regulatory oversight and consumer awareness initiatives may contribute to more equitable service delivery and improved accountability across stakeholders.

Originality / Value: This research offers empirical insights into customer experiences with airline refund processes, an area that remains underexplored compared to service disruption studies. By integrating procedural challenges, satisfaction outcomes, and intermediary involvement, the study highlights transparency as a critical determinant of customer trust. The findings provide practical value for airlines, travel intermediaries, and policymakers seeking to reform refund governance.

 

Keywords:  Airline refund policies, customer satisfaction, Service recovery, Transparency in aviation, Travel Intermediaries.

 

JEL: L93, M31, D12, L51, D91.

Files

IJREBS711.pdf

Files (465.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ae5a2e789035f4bd9e5e1c2c100e76ba
465.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Abdelhady, M. R. R. & AbouHamad, M. M. H. (2020). Airlines' pricing strategies and OD markets: Theoretical and practical pricing strategies. Journal of Travel, Tourism & Recreation, 2(3), 19-36. https://10.22259/2642-908X.0203004 2. Chen, F. Y., & Chang, Y. H. (2005). Examining airline service quality from a process perspective. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2004.09.002 3. Choi, B. & Choi, B.-J. (2014). The Effects of perceived Service Recovery Justice on Customer Affection, Loyalty, and Word-of-Mouth. European Journal of Marketing, 48(1/2), 108-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2011-0299 4. CNN (2017, June 16). Airline pricing secrets: How carriers come up with fares. CNN Travel. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/airline-pricing-secrets 5. Currie, C. S. M., Cheng, R. C. H., & Smith, H. K. (2008). Dynamic pricing of airline tickets with competition. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(8), 1026–1037. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602425 6. Dada, O. A., Olaleye, S. A., Sanusi, I. T., Obaido, G., & Aruleba, K. (2021). Customer satisfaction: Refunds from European airlines during COVID-19. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(10), 287-304. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354902099_ 7. Fiig, T., Le Guen, R., & Gauchet, M. (2019). Dynamic Pricing of Airline Offers. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 17(6), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-018-0147-z 8. Graham, R. J., Garrow, L. A. & Leonard, J. D. (2010). Business travellers' ticketing, refund, and exchange behaviour. Journal of Air Transport Management, 16(4), 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2009.12.002 9. Haryati, E. S. & Dyahjatmayanti, D. (2023). Factors affecting consumer intention to cancellation of airline tickets. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Hospitality, Travel, and Event Conference. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-170-8_6 10. IATA (2023, June 5). Aviation consumer protection regulation should address shared responsibilities (Press Release No. 32). https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2023-releases/2023-06-05-06/ 11. Kron, K. (2025, Nov. 25). Why is automating airline ticket changes and refunds important? atpco.net, https://atpco.net/blog/why-is-automating-airline-ticket-changes-and-refunds-important/ 12. Matikiti, R., Mpinganjira, M. & Roberts-Lombard, M. (2019). Service recovery satisfaction and customer commitment in the airline business: An emerging African market perspective. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 11(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-01-2019-0005 13. McCollough, M. A., Berry, L. L. & Yadav, M. S. (2000). An empirical investigation of customer satisfaction after service failure and recovery. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050032002 14. Moon, S., & Watanabe, M. (2010). Refund premium: Evidence from the airline industry. Department of Economics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228816282_ 15. Oliver, R. L. (2014). Satisfaction: A behavioural perspective on the consumer (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315700892 16. Ostrowski, P. L., O'Brien, T. V. & Gordon, G. L. (1993). Service quality and customer loyalty in the commercial airline industry. Journal of Travel Research, 32(2), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759303200203 17. Shin, R. Park, J. & Choi, D. (2024). Disruptive Passenger Behaviour Impact on Overall Service Experience: An appraisal theory perspective. Sustainability, 16(7), 2773. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072773 18. Smith, B.C., Darrow, R., Elieson, J., Guenther, D., Rao, V., & Zouaoui, F. (2007). Travelocity becomes a travel retailer. Interfaces, 37(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1060.0273 19. Smith, B. C., Leimkuhler, J. F. & Darrow, R. M. (1992). Yield management at American Airlines. Interfaces, 22(1), 8–31. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.22.1.8 20. Williams, K. (2017). Dynamic airline pricing and seat availability. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University. CFDP No. 2103R, 1-75. https://cowles.yale.edu/node/139076 21. Wilson, A., Zeithaml, V., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2016). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill. 22. Wirtz, J. & Lovelock, C. (2021). Services marketing: People, technology, strategy (9th ed.). World Scientific. 23. Wittman, M. D. (2014). Are low-cost carrier passengers less likely to complain about service quality? Journal of Air Transport Management, 35, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.11.008 24. Zhao, G., & Deng, J. (2019). A study on the dynamic refund fee model of air tickets based on win-to-win mechanism. Journal of Airline and Airport Management, 9(2), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.3926/jairm.129