Published March 3, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Chatbot come confidenti: ma si può davvero fare amicizia con un'AI?

Authors/Creators

  • 1. University of Catania ITALY

Contributors

Contact person:

  • 1. University of Catania ITALY

Description

I chatbot relazionali stanno ridefinendo la vita affettiva contemporanea. La ricerca mostra benefici reali — riduzione della solitudine, supporto emotivo — ma anche rischi: dipendenza, assenza di reciprocità, impoverimento delle competenze sociali. Un fenomeno che interroga l’intera esperienza umana

Files

BENNATO-Chatbot come confidenti ma si può davvero fare amicizia con unAI.pdf

Files (231.9 kB)

Additional details

Dates

Copyrighted
2026-03-03

References

  • Ait Baha, T., El Hajji, M., Es-Saady, Y., & Fadili, H. (2023). The power of personalization: A systematic review of personality-adaptive chatbots. SN Computer Science, 4(5), Article 661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02092-6
  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. Hemisphere.
  • Banks, J. (2024). Deletion, departure, death: Experiences of AI companion loss. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(12), 3547–3572. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241269688
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
  • Beres, D. (2025, November 5). AI is not your friend.
  • Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2), 293–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/1067860.1067867
  • Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2024). Intimate relationships (4th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Brandtzaeg, P. B., Skjuve, M., & Følstad, A. (2022). My AI friend: How users of a social chatbot understand their human–AI friendship. Human Communication Research, 48(3), 404–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac008
  • Burgoon, J. K., & Jones, S. B. (1976). Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations. Human Communication Research, 2(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00706.x
  • Christoforakos, L., Feicht, N., Hinkofer, S., Löscher, A., Schlegl, S. F., & Diefenbach, S. (2021). Connect with me. Exploring influencing factors in a human-technology relationship based on regular chatbot use. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3, 689999. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.689999
  • Cocking, D., & Kennett, J. (1998). Friendship and the self. Ethics, 108(3), 502–527. https://doi.org/10.1086/233824
  • Croes, E. A. J., & Antheunis, M. L. (2020). Can we be friends with Mitsuku? A longitudinal study on the process of relationship formation between humans and a social chatbot. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(1), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520959463
  • De Freitas, J., Uğuralp, A. K., Oğuz-Uğuralp, Z., & Puntoni, S. (2023). Chatbots and mental health: Insights into the safety of generative AI. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34, 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1393
  • De Freitas, J., Uguralp, A. K., Uguralp, Z. O., & Stefano, P. (2024). AI companions reduce loneliness. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4893097
  • Depounti, I., Saukko, P., & Natale, S. (2022). Ideal technologies, ideal women: AI and gender imaginaries in Redditors' discussions on the Replika bot girlfriend. Media, Culture & Society, 45(4), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221119021
  • Drouin, M., Sprecher, S., Nicola, R., & Perkins, T. (2022). Is chatting with a sophisticated chatbot as good as chatting online or FTF with a stranger? Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107100
  • Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R., & Shelton, A. K. (2014). Is that a bot running the social media feed? Testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 372–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.013
  • Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
  • Evans-Lacko, S., et al. (2018). Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: Results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Psychological Medicine, 48(9), 1560–1571. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717003336
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  • Hanson, K. R., & Bolthouse, H. (2024). "Replika removing erotic role-play is like Grand Theft Auto removing guns or cars": Reddit discourse on AI chatbots and sexual technologies. Socius, 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241259627
  • Hart, R. (2026, January 6). AI moves into the real world as companion robots and pets.
  • Hirsch, J. L., & Clark, M. S. (2019). Multiple paths to belonging that we should study together. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 238–255.
  • Ho, A., Hancock, J., & Miner, A. S. (2018). Psychological, relational, and emotional effects of self-disclosure after conversations with a chatbot. Journal of Communication, 68, 712–733. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy026
  • Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
  • Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352
  • Kang, H., & Kim, K. J. (2020). Feeling connected to smart objects? A moderated mediation model of locus of agency, anthropomorphism, and sense of connectedness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 133, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.09.002
  • Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. W. H. Freeman.
  • Kim, K. J., Park, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2013). Caregiving role in human–robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1799–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.009
  • Kogan, A., Impett, E. A., Oveis, C., Hui, B., Gordon, A. M., & Keltner, D. (2010). When giving feels good. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1918–1924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610388815
  • Krämer, N. C., Lucas, G., Schmitt, L., & Gratch, J. (2018). Social snacking with a virtual agent. On the interrelation of need to belong and effects of social responsiveness when interacting with artificial entities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 109, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.09.001
  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?. American psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
  • Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
  • Lee, B., Kwon, O., Lee, I., & Kim, J. (2017). Companionship with smart home devices: The impact of social connectedness and interaction types on perceived social support and companionship in smart homes. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.031
  • Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
  • Levinger, G. (1980). Toward the analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(6), 510–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90056-6
  • Maples, B., Cerit, M., Vishwanath, A., & Pea, R. (2024). Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots. NPJ Mental Health Research, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6
  • Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
  • Ovsyannikova, D., de Mello, V. O., & Inzlicht, M. (2025). Third-party evaluators perceive AI as more compassionate than expert humans. Communications Psychology, 3(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00182-6
  • Pereira, M. J., Coheur, L., Fialho, P., & Ribeiro, R. (2016). Chatbots' greetings to human-computer communication. Computing Research Repository (CoRR), arXiv:1609.06479.
  • Perry, A. (2023). AI will never convey the essence of human empathy. Nature Human Behavior, 7(11), 1808–1809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01675-w
  • Phang, J., Lampe, M., Ahmad, L., Agarwal, S., Fang, C. M., Liu, A. R., Danry, V., Lee, E., Chan, S. W. T., Pataranutaporn, P., & Maes, P. (2025). Investigating affective use and emotional well-being on ChatGPT. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/html/2504.03888v1
  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge University Press.
  • Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367–389). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Shawar, B. A., & Atwell, E. (2007). Chatbots: Are they really useful? LDV Forum, 22(1), 29–49.
  • Shim, H., Cho, J., & Sung, Y. H. (2024). Unveiling secrets to AI agents: Exploring the interplay of conversation type, self-disclosure, and privacy insensitivity. Asian Communication Research, 21(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.20879/acr.2024.21.019
  • Shteynberg, G., Halpern, J., Sadovnik, A., Garthoff, J., Perry, A., Hay, J., Montemayor, C., Olson, M. A., Hulsey, T. L., & Fairweather, A. (2024). Does it matter if empathic AI has no empathy? Nature Machine Intelligence, 6(5), 496–497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00841-7
  • Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., Fostervold, K. I., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2021). My chatbot companion: A study of human–chatbot relationships. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 149, Article 102601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102601
  • Smith, M. G., Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2025). Can generative AI chatbots emulate human connection? A relationship science perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916251351306
  • Smith, M. G., Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2025). Can generative AI chatbots emulate human connection? A relationship science perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916251351306
  • Stroessner, S. J., & Koya, P. D. (2024). Thinking socially about the nonsocial world. In D. E. Carlston, K. Hugenberg, & K. L. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 616–643). Oxford University Press.
  • Ta-Johnson, V. P., Boatfield, C., Wang, X., DeCero, E., Krupica, I. C., Rasof, S. D., Motzer, A., & Pedryc, W. M. (2022). Assessing the topics and motivating factors behind human-social chatbot interactions. JMIR Human Factors, 9(4), Article e38876. https://doi.org/10.2196/38876
  • The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/2025/12/ai-companionship-anti-social-media/684596/
  • The Economist. (2025, November 6). A new industry of AI companions is emerging. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/international/2025/11/06/a-new-industry-of-ai-companions-is-emerging
  • The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/news/856207/ces-2026-trend-ai-companion-robot-pet
  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Wiley.
  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
  • Van Bel, D. T., Smolders, K. C., IJsselsteijn, W. A., & de Kort, Y. (2009). Social connectedness: Concept and measurement. Intelligent Environments, 2, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-034-6-67
  • Vowels, L. M. (2024). Are chatbots the new relationship experts? Insights from three studies. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(2), Article 100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100077
  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 1–43.
  • Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369336
  • Welge, J., & Hassenzahl, M. (2016). Better than human: About the psychological superpowers of robots. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 993–1002). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_97
  • Xie, T., Pentina, I., & Hancock, T. (2023). Friend, mentor, lover: Does chatbot engagement lead to psychological dependence? Journal of Service Management, 34(4), 806–828. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-02-2022-0072