Published March 23, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Projected habitat loss and persistence of Heortia vitessoides (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) in China Under CMIP6 Climate Models

  • 1. Guangdong Lingnanyuan Exploration & Design Co Ltd, Guangzhou, China
  • 2. South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3. Guangdong Eco-Engineering Polytechnic, Guangzhou, China

Description

Heortia vitessoides Moore is a destructive pest of Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Spreng, a significant economic crop. To understand the current and future geographical range change of this pest, we employed the maximum entropy model (MaxEnt) to assess the potential habitats of H. vitessoides in China, integrating global distribution data with environmental variables correlated with H. vitessoides occurrence. The findings demonstrated that the primary environmental factors affecting the distribution of H. vitessoides included the precipitation of the warmest quarter, annual precipitation, annual mean temperature and slope. Given the current climate, the potential distribution area of H. vitessoides in China is 96.31 × 104 km2, representing approximately 10.03% of the total land area of the country. Projections under future climate scenarios indicate an overall contraction of suitable habitats, with the SSP245 scenario for 2050 suggesting the greatest contraction (15.64%) in the potential distribution area to 85.43 × 104 km2. Despite this decline, H. vitessoides maintains a robust and persistent presence in core habitats of southern China, where it maintains stable distribution patterns, which may facilitate its persistence and local spread. Some regions, particularly in south-eastern Yunnan and Sichuan, may experience slight expansions, continuing to threaten the sustainability of A. sinensis. This work is crucial for monitoring and control of H. vitessoides in locations where it currently occurs and where it may become prevalent in the future, thereby contributing to the preservation of Aquilaria sinensis and its associated economic ecosystems.

Files

BDJ_article_182844.pdf

Files (877.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:089d247a850181dd36c68d745ab2f145
740.3 kB Preview Download
md5:47b657c8f3c7758b8109b269c9e2b2fe
137.7 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 1223‑1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
  • Amundrud SL, Srivastava DS (2020) Thermal tolerances and species interactions determine the elevational distributions of insects. Global Ecology and Biogeography 29: 1315‑1327. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13106
  • Barbet-Massin M, Jetz W (2014) A 40-year, continent-wide, multispecies assessment of relevant climate predictors for species distribution modelling. Diversity and Distributions 20: 1285‑1295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12229
  • Booth TH (2022) The need for a global tree trial database. New Forests 54: 1‑7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-022-09940-y
  • Carmel Y, Kadmon R (1999) Effects of grazing and topography on long-term vegetation changes in a Mediterranean ecosystem in Israel. Plant Ecology 145 (2): 243‑254. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009872306093
  • Chen C, Harvey JA, Biere A, Gols R (2019) Rain downpours affect survival and development of insect herbivores: the specter of climate change? Ecology 100: e02819. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2819
  • Clarke A (2003) Costs and consequences of evolutionary temperature adaptation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 573‑581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.007
  • Dang Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Xin B, Quinn NF, Duan JJ (2021) Retrospective analysis of factors affecting the distribution of an invasive wood-boring insect using native range data: the importance of host plants. Journal of Pest Science 94: 981‑990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-020-01308-5
  • Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2010) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17: 43‑57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
  • Fadda LA, Murúa MG, Casmuz AS, Vera MA, Lira-Noriega A (2023) Potential distribution of Melanagromyza sojae in South America and current situation in Argentina. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 171: 621‑636. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.13302
  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24: 38‑49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000088
  • GBIF (2024) GBIF occurrence download. Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • Gidden MJ, Riahi K, Smith SJ, Fujimori S, Luderer G, Kriegler E, Takahashi K (2019) Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century. Geoscientific Model Development 12: 1443‑1475. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1443-2019
  • Guevara L, Gerstner BE, Kass JM, Anderson RP (2017) Toward ecologically realistic predictions of species distributions: a cross-time example from tropical montane cloud forests. Global Change Biology 24: 1511‑1522. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13992
  • Gu X, Zhang Q, Liu J, Zhang Z (2014) Characteristics, causes and impacts of the changes of the flood frequency in the Pearl River drainage basin from 1951 to 2010. Journal of Lake Sciences 26: 661‑670. https://doi.org/10.18307/2014.0503
  • Jiang C, Zhang X, Xie W, Wang R, Feng C, Ma L, Wang H (2022) Predicting the potential distribution of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda under climate change in China. Global Ecology and Conservation 33: e01994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01994
  • Jiang D, Hu D, Tian Z, Lang X (2020) Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate over China and the East Asian monsoon. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 37: 1102‑1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-2034-y
  • Ji W, Han K, Lu Y, Wei J (2020) Predicting the potential distribution of the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus, under climate change by MaxEnt. Crop Protection 137: 105268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105268
  • Kass JM, Muscarella R, Galante PJ, Bohl CL, Pinilla-Buitrago GE, Boria RA, Anderson RP (2021) ENMeval 2.0: redesigned for customizable and reproducible modeling of species' niches and distributions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12: 1602‑1608. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13628
  • Lai C, Chen X, Wang Z, Zhao S, Wu X, Yu H (2015) Spatial and temporal variations of rainfall erosivity on Pearl River basin during 1960-2012. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 31: 159‑167. [In Chinese].
  • Lehmann A, Overton JM, Leathwick (2002) GRASP: generalized regression analysis and spatial prediction. Ecological Modelling 157: 189‑207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00195-3
  • Liang S, Cai J, Chen X, Jin Z, Zhang J, Huang Z, Wang C (2019) Larval aggregation of Heortia vitessoides Moore (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and evidence of horizontal transfer of avermectin. Forests 10: 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040331
  • Li B, Ma J, Hu X, Liu H, Zhang R (2009) Potential geographical distributions of the fruit flies Ceratitis capitata, Ceratitis cosyra and Ceratitis rosa in China. Journal of Economic Entomology 102: 1781‑1790. https://doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0508
  • Li Z, Liu Y, Zeng H (2022) Application of the MaxEnt model in improving the accuracy of ecological red line identification: a case study of Zhanjiang, China. Ecological Indicators 137: 108767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108767
  • Mao X, Zheng H, Liao S, Wei H, Lin H, Wang Q, Chen H (2024) Predicting the potential distribution of Perina nuda under climate change in China. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 172: 738‑750. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.13451
  • Muscarella R, Galante PJ, Soley-Guardia M, Boria RA, Kass JM, Uriarte M, Anderson RP (2014) ENMeval: an R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for MaxEnt ecological niche models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5: 1198‑1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12261
  • Pan Z, Wen C, Liu C, Woodgate JL, Chen Z, Yang W, Ma T (2023) Fine structure of the compound eyes of male and female Heortia vitessoides Moore (Lepidoptera: Crambidae. Microscopy and Microanalysis 29: 786‑794. https://doi.org/10.1093/micmic/ozac034
  • Park HJ, Nam BE, Moon SY, Kim S, Joo Y, Kim JG (2021) Reduced host plant growth and increased tyrosine-derived secondary metabolites under climate change and negative consequences on its specialist herbivore. Science of the Total Environment 759: 143507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143507
  • Peterson AT, Cobos ME, Jiménez-García D (2018) Major challenges for correlational ecological niche model projections to future climate conditions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1429: 66‑77. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13873
  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190: 231‑259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
  • Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J, Ferrier S (2009) Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecological Applications 19: 181‑197. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2153.1
  • Qian C, Ma T, Qiu H, Lyu H, Liang S, Shao Y, Wang C (2023) Lethal, transmission, behavioral, and physiological effects of Metarhizium anisopliae against gregarious larvae of Heortia vitessoides and synergistic effects between Metarhizium anisopliae and insecticides. Pest Management Science 79: 2191‑2205. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7398
  • Qiao H, Lu P, Liu S, Xu C, Guo K, Xu R, Chen J (2018) Volatiles from Aquilaria sinensis damaged by Heortia vitessoides larvae deter the conspecific gravid adults and attract its predator Cantheconidea concinna. Scientific Reports 8: 15067. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33404-z
  • Riahi K, Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, Edmonds J, O'Neill BC, Fujimori S, Tavoni M (2017) The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Global Environmental Change 42: 153‑168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
  • Riihimäki H, Heiskanen J, Luoto M (2017) The effect of topography on arctic-alpine aboveground biomass and NDVI patterns. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 56: 44‑53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.11.005
  • Shcheglovitova M, Anderson RP (2013) Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: a jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. Ecological Modelling 269: 9‑17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011
  • Sillero N, Barbosa AM (2019) Common mistakes in ecological niche models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 35: 213‑226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1798968
  • Sillero N, Arenas-Castro S, Enriquez-Urzelai U, Vale CG, Sousa-Guedes D, Martínez-Freiría F, Barbosa AM (2021) Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling. Ecological Modelling 456: 109671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109671
  • Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285‑1293. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3287615
  • Team, R.Core (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing
  • Thomson HM, Gerwing TG, Shackelford N (2024) Modelling the risk of coastal habitat invasion by the aquatic plant Iris pseudacorus to inform monitoring and management efforts. Biological Invasions 26: 3147‑3162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03366-7
  • Thuiller W (2003) BIOMOD-optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global Change Biology 9: 1353‑1362. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00666.x
  • Urban MC (2015) Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348: 571‑573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4984
  • Wei J, Peng L, He Z, Lu Y, Wang F (2020) Potential distribution of two invasive pineapple pests under climate change. Pest Management Science 76: 1652‑1663. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5684
  • Wei N, Xia J, Zhou J, Jiang L, Cui E, Ping J, Luo Y (2022) Evolution of uncertainty in terrestrial carbon storage in Earth system models from CMIP5 to CMIP6. Journal of Climate 35: 5483‑5499. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0763.1
  • Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
  • Wu M, He H, Zong S, Tan X, Du H, Zhao D, Liu K, Liang Y (2018) Topographic controls on vegetation changes in alpine tundra of the Changbai Mountains. Forests 9 (12): 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9120756
  • Xin X, Wu T, Zhang J, Yao J, Fang Y (2020) Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 simulations of precipitation in China and the East Asian summer monsoon. International Journal of Climatology 40: 6423‑6440. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6590
  • Xu D, Li X, Jin Y, Zhuo Z, Yang H, Hu J, Wang R (2020) Influence of climatic factors on the potential distribution of pest Heortia vitessoides Moore in China. Global Ecology and Conservation 23: e01107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01107
  • Yan D, Chen W, Liu L, Liu L, Wang Y (2018) Change in current and future geographic distributions of Ulmus lamellosa in China. Journal of Forestry Research 29: 1147‑1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0503-7
  • Yan Z, Yue J, Yang C (2019) Potential use of Trichogramma pintoi as a biocontrol agent against Heortia vitessoides (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 113: 654‑659. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz332
  • Ye Q, Li Z, Chen Q, Sun M, Yin M, Lin T (2023) Fatty acid-binding protein gene is indispensable for molting process in Heortia vitessoides (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Journal of Integrative Agriculture 22: 495‑504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.003
  • Zhao Z, Feng X, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Zhang Y (2024) Potential suitability areas of Sitobion miscanthi in China based on the MaxEnt model: implications for management. Crop Protection 183: 106755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106755
  • Zhou Y, Zhan Q, Zhao X, Lu L, Gan B (2017) Developmental threshold temperature and effective accumulative temperature of Heortia vitessoides in Hainan. Plant Protection 37: 46‑48. [In Chinese].
  • Zhu H, Jiang Z, Li J, Li W, Sun C, Li L (2020) Does CMIP6 inspire more confidence in simulating climate extremes over China? Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 37: 1119‑1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-9289-1