Published March 25, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Sustainable and Energy-Efficient Automation in Mechanical Weeding: A Review of Manual Implements to Smart Robots

Description

The increasing problems of labor shortages and environmental concerns, and a rising demand for sustainable food production have catalysed the development of automated mechanical weeding solutions. This paper is a systematic Review of technological evolution toward energy efficiency automatic wheel hoes, a very significant area in agricultural robotics. This review analyzes the spectrum of weeding technologies through the unifying lens of energy efficiency Operational viability and sustainability rely on this as a key metric. The review synthesizes findings to demonstrate that a system-level approach encompassing prime mover selection, mechatronic design, traction optimization, and advanced energy management is essential. Key findings indicate that battery-electric systems can achieve high weeding efficiency of 97 percentage with a far lower specific energy consumption than engine-powered counterparts. Furthermore, the integration of Battery Management Systems, high-efficiency wireless power transfer (WPT), and solar Recharging provides a feasible avenue to achieve operational feasibility. The review identifies unresolved challenges such as the influence of soil conditions on tractive efficiency and the energy cost of precision guidance. We conclude by delineating future research imperatives: adaptive control systems, standardized energy metrics, and hybrid human-robot workflows to optimize the energy budget of modern farming.

Files

Sustainable and Energy-Efficient Automation in Mechanical.pdf

Files (400.2 kB)

Additional details

References

  • 1. Sridhar, S. H. (2013). Development of single wheel multi use manually operated weed remover. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 3(6), 3836–3840.
  • 2. Tiwari, P. S., & Varshney, A. C. (2002). Effect of forward speed on field performance of power tiller. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 72(3), 151–155.
  • 3. Kareem, K. I., & Sven, P. (2019). Effect of ploughing depth, tractor forward speed, and plough types on fuel consumption. Polytechnic Journal, 9(1), 43–49.
  • 4. Kiran, R., et al. (2014). Performance evaluation of power weeder, star weeder and wheel hoe. Andhra Agricultural Journal, 61(4), 907–914.
  • 5. Mari, G. R., et al. (2011). Performance evaluation of selected tillage implements under saline-sodic soils. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 10(1), 42–48.
  • 6. Singh, M. K., et al. (2019). Battery assisted four-wheel weeder for reducing drudgery of farmers. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(9), 1434–1438.
  • 7. Gerhards, R., Kollenda, A., & Peteinatos, M. M. M. (2022). Herbicide application techniques and selective weed control in precision farming systems. Agronomy, 12(4).
  • 8. Pérez-Ruiz, M., Slaughter, D. C., Gliever, C. J., & Upadhyaya, B. L. (2012). Automatic GPS-based intra-row weed knife control system for transplanted row crops. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 80, 41–49.
  • 9. Soumya, K. V., et al. (2024). Electric vehicle battery management for sustainable farming. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Sustainable Technology Advancement in Engineering Domain.
  • 10. Diao, X., et al. (2023). Research on electric vehicle charging safety warning based on A-LSTM algorithm. IEEE Access, 11, 55081–55093.