Published June 1, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

The Silent Partner: Ethical Risks of Invisible AI Intervention in Academic Library Services

  • 1. K.C. Das Commerce College

Description

This paper examines the ethical challenges posed by invisible artificial intelligence (AI) interventions in academic library services. As libraries increasingly adopt AI to enhance user experience and efficiency, concerns arise around transparency, accountability, and bias within automated decision-making. Invisible AI-embedded frameworks functioning without explicit user awareness-raises issues regarding user privacy, data security, intellectual freedom, and the integrity of library services. The study highlights how silent algorithms can influence information access, research behavior, and potentially reinforce stereotypes, threatening the neutrality and inclusivity of library spaces. Key issues addressed include informed consent, user autonomy, and the need for explainability in AI-driven systems. Drawing on a survey of institutional practices and review of existing literature, the paper identifies recurring ethical challenges and policy gaps, especially when commercial AI solutions are adopted. To address these, the paper proposes guidelines for ethical AI use in libraries, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration and the protection of user rights. It concludes with a call for comprehensive institutional policies, staff training, and ongoing ethical audits to ensure AI supports, rather than undermines, the core values of academic librarianship.

Files

84.Archanagita Saikia 22433.pdf

Files (760.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6856d5a2e3c259235646a8162b612b1d
760.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Behnke, J., Loeber, A., & Van de Poel, I. (2021). Responsibilty for Risks of Harm in AI Systems: A Framework for Determining Responsibility in Complex Systems. AI & Society, 435-449.
  • Binns, R., Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Shadbolt, N. (2018). It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage: Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
  • IFLA. (2020). IFLA Statement on Libraries and Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions: https://www.ifla.org
  • Jyoti, P. K. (2024). Reshaping the library landscape: Exploring the integration of artificial intelligence in libraries. IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology, 9(1), 29- 36.
  • Morgan, L. P. (2023). Looking towards a brighter future: The potentiality of AI and digital transformations to library spaces. Digital Future research report: Artificial intelligence (AI) in Libraries Project. Leeds: University of Leeds Libraries.
  • Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsley, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020). From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods, and Research to Translate Principles into Practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2141-2168.
  • Ogungbenro, O. D., Esse, U. C., Olowoporoku, I., & Christopher, A. (2025). Revolutionizing Library Services: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Cataloguing and Access to Information in Nigerian Academic Libraries. Journal of Library Metadata, 25(2), 99-118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2025.2475418
  • Tsekea, S., & Mandoga, E. (2025). The ethics of artificial intelligence use in university libraries in Zimbabwe. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics.