Published March 14, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

DISTRIBUTIVE LEADERSHIP MODELS AND THEIR EFFECT ON EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

  • 1. CEBU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CEBU CITY, PHILIPPINES, 6000.
  • 2. CEBU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MJ CUENCO, CEBU CITY, PHILIPPINES, 6000.

Description

Employee engagement is an important factor in improving organizational performance, particularly in educational institutions where collaboration and shared responsibilities are essential. This study examined the influence of distributive leadership models on employee engagement among teachers and non-teaching personnel at Villaba National Comprehensive High School in Villaba North District, Cabunga-an, Villaba, Leyte. Distributive leadership refers to a leadership approach in which leadership responsibilities are shared among members of an organization rather than concentrated in a single leader. A descriptive-correlational research design was used, with data collected from 42 teaching and non-teaching personnel through a structured survey questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the levels of distributive leadership and employee engagement, while Pearson correlation analysis was applied to examine their relationship. Results showed that distributive leadership practices were implemented at a high level, particularly in shared decision-making and collaborative planning. Employee engagement was also found to be high, especially in commitment to school goals, teamwork, and job satisfaction. The correlation analysis revealed a moderate positive relationship between distributive leadership and employee engagement. These findings suggest that shared leadership practices contribute to higher employee motivation, collaboration, and commitment within the school environment. Strengthening distributive leadership practices may further enhance employee engagement in educational institutions.

Files

15. BONETA F. CAWALING - Online.pdf

Files (889.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0c5a8cf7d23da02eef160d4a2c09d2b9
889.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

ISSN
2455-295X

Related works

Is compiled by
Journal article: 2455-295X (ISSN)

References

  • 1. Harris, A. (2020). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. School Leadership & Management, 40(2–3), 113–121.
  • 2. Nguyen, D., Harris, A., & Ng, D. (2020). A review of the empirical research on distributed leadership, 2009–2019. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 1–17.
  • 3. Shuck, B., Adelson, J., & Reio, T. (2020). The employee engagement scale: Initial evidence for construct validity and implications for theory and practice. Human Resource Management, 59(4), 1–15.
  • 4. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2021). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2019: Theory development, empirical evidence, and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 303–323.
  • 5. Fletcher, J., & Käufer, K. (2021). Shared leadership and employee engagement: A systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(6), 781–799.
  • 5. Fletcher, J., & Käufer, K. (2021). Shared leadership and employee engagement: A systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(6), 781–799.
  • 7. Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring human resources management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100835.
  • 8. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2021). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 41(1–2), 1–19.