Published May 27, 2026 | Version Version 3

Phi-Deviation as an Objective Biomarker for Chronic Pain: A Fibonacci Causal Loop Theory Framework for Neural Necessity Depth Disruption

  • 1. Independent Researcher Tucson, Arizona

Description

Chronic pain affects approximately one in five adults globally and remains systematically undertreated because no objective biomarker exists. This paper applies Fibonacci Causal Loop Theory (FCLT) to propose the first phi-deviation-based objective biomarker for chronic pain. FCLT identifies the necessity recursion S(n) = S(n−1) + S(n−2) as the universal driver of organizational structure. Paper 02 demonstrated that neural complexity tracks necessity depth with r = 0.9071 across 38 vertebrate species. This paper extends that framework to pain neuroscience, proposing that chronic pain represents necessity recursion dysregulation: a pathological lock in pain-processing networks at an elevated phi-deviation state that does not self-correct. A formal Necessity Depth Disruption Index (NDDI) is introduced, defined as the standardized phi-deviation elevation of a patient’s pain-processing network relative to a healthy-control baseline, with individual-level biomarker threshold NDDI > 1.96. Prediction 14 is formally stated and pre-registered (March 13, 2026): phi-deviation in the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, thalamus, and default mode network will be systematically elevated in chronic pain patients compared to healthy controls, will correlate with pain severity independently of self-report, will persist during pain-free periods, and will decrease with effective treatment. Testable immediately against open-access fMRI datasets. Confirmation would provide the first objective, non-self-report biomarker for chronic pain.

Files

Paper 14 Davis PRB v2.pdf

Files (97.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c5584c4cf2126291767a54f27d2d2204
97.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Peer review: 10.5281/zenodo.18904096 (DOI)
Peer review: 10.5281/zenodo.18904258 (DOI)
Peer review: 10.5281/zenodo.18969666 (DOI)
Peer review: 10.5281/zenodo.18970028 (DOI)