Discrete Triadic Ontology under Modal Discipline: a Critical–Propositional Reading of Triadic Mesh Dynamics, by Aleš Kováč, in Confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents an expanded critical–propositional reading of Aleš Kováč’s Triadic Mesh Dynamics: A Discrete Ontology of Space Based on Oriented 2-Simplices in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines the extent to which Kováč’s discrete triadic ontology of space can be considered compatible with the modal, ontological, and cosmogonic discipline of TO, especially in light of its Seven Absolute Truths, its cosmogonic theorem, its phenomenic framework, and its recent AI-assisted operational and testability agenda.

The article argues that Triadic Mesh Dynamics offers important points of convergence with the Theory of Objectivity, particularly in its emphasis on triadic relationality, emergent geometry, non-fundamental time, local transition rules, and matter as a stabilized topological effect. At the same time, the study identifies decisive tensions: TMD appears to begin from space where TO begins before space; it still presupposes a minimal geometric support; and it does not yet sufficiently explicate the transcendent element beyond the quantum. In this article, that transcendent element is interpreted, in accordance with the adopted TO framework, as the knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiation.

The paper is structured as a full academic study in Chicago author–date style, with systematic dialogue between the analyzed article, the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent production on modal ontology and testability, and a wider supporting bibliography in physics and philosophy. It concludes that TMD should not be read as a substitute for the Theory of Objectivity, but rather as a potentially fertile discrete formalization of derived phenomenic regimes within a broader objective cosmogony.

The article also proposes that, under modal discipline, TMD may serve as an important interlocutor for future research on emergent geometry, discrete ontologies of spacetime, gravitational phenomenology, quantum-like behavior, operational bridges, and the testability of non-standard foundational frameworks.

Keywords

Theory of Objectivity; Triadic Mesh Dynamics; discrete ontology; modal ontology; emergent geometry; triads; curvature; torsion; topological defects; emergent time; quantum-like behavior; cosmology; testability; operational bridges; phenomenic theory