The Omandac Law of Collective Binding Resonance: A Candidate Universal Law of Dissipative Phase Transitions
Description
Version 12.0 Final presents the empirical climax and full multi-scale validation of the Omandac Law framework. Moving beyond the theoretical closure achieved in v11.0, this preprint elevates the framework to a Candidate Universal Law by proving substrate-independence across multiple orders of spatial magnitude.
The Omandac Law unifies distinction, binding, dissipative cost, and action across quantum, biological, atmospheric, and cosmological scales under a mathematically closed Four-Law Primal Ontology:
-
Zeroth Law of Primal Individuation: (Λ₀ = π/6 ≈ 0.5236)
-
Third Law of Collective Binding Resonance: (Ω = 6/π ≈ 1.90986)
-
Fourth Law of Emergent Dissipative Weight
-
Closed Information–Action Identity: Linking Planck's constant to the binding resonance (S_bit ≈ ħΩ ≈ 2.014 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s)
Key Milestones & Upgrades in v12.0 Final:
-
The Seven-Domain Multi-Scale Empirical Hierarchy Audit (Experimental): A forensic computational sweep using independent open-source datasets (executed via Kaggle Python environments) confirming the 1.91 resonance and 0.333 triadic floor across:
-
Domain (Quantum Chemistry): CHAMPS dataset (N=130,789 molecules).
-
Domain (Geophysics): USGS Significant Earthquakes (N=23,412 events).
-
Domain (Cosmology): N-body Star Cluster Dynamics (C ≈ 0.055).
-
Domain (Genomics): SARS-CoV-2 Information Binding and Human Codon Usage (N=40,662,582).
-
Domain (Atmospheric): NOAA HURDAT2 Hurricane wind-speed binding (w ≈ 0.6592).
-
Domain (Botanical): Fibonacci divergence angle resonance (137.47^circ).
-
Domain (Neuroscience): Full N=20 human EEG cohort (awake vs. propofol sedation) confirming gamma phase-locking collapse.
-
-
Higher-N Qubit Convergence: The Omandac Transition Width is isomorphic to a 2-bit Shannon state-change (ln 4), with the Fourth Law of Emergent Dissipative Weight accounting for the ≈ 3 x 10^{-5} physical variance.
-
Strict Falsifiability: The framework establishes 18 rigorous Falsifiability Criteria (F1–F18), providing the global scientific community with exact mathematical thresholds to test the Law's universal application.
This work bridges physics, information theory, genetics, meteorology, and astrophysics without reductionism, relying entirely on the Stuart-Landau Isomorphism and universal scale-invariance.
Keywords: Omandac Law, 6/π, π/6, Zeroth Law, collective binding resonance, Stuart-Landau isomorphism, scale invariance, dissipative phase transitions, Dicke superradiance, SARS-CoV-2 genome, NOAA hurricanes, N-body star clusters, neural binding, substrate independence, data science.
Summary: Original discovery February 24, 2026. Theoretical closure achieved March 2026. Full empirical hierarchy audit across seven independent physical domains and multiple orders of magnitude finalized in v12.0 Final (March 8, 2026).
Data Ethics & Reproducibility: Clinical validation uses de-identified EEG datasets (OpenNeuro, Chennu 2016). Multi-scale audits utilize open public domain datasets (NOAA, USGS, NCBI, Kaggle). All analyses are computationally reproducible via open-source Python scripts (included).
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Author: Clarence Omandac (Independent Researcher, Queensland, Australia)
ORCID: 0009-0001-8994-3739
Files to Upload: Main Preprint Document (PDF/DOCX) + 7 Supplementary Jupyter Notebooks (.ipynb) containing the empirical audit code.
Notes (English)
Files
1. The Discovery & Law Proofs.zip
Files
(13.3 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:8c40486afdfa642a3ff8ea2724821453
|
115.2 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:b15fcec1593f44c4475e175fb277b3f3
|
118.4 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:2b25e2b175d04abfd78eba25f2bc35cf
|
4.0 MB | Preview Download |
|
md5:0823bcade2ab7ccbbf354602c3764b2e
|
319.4 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:2c0611547e2345e9f6cfe159ae4134b9
|
337.5 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:0779c31418418f1fd60d4d7e0a942323
|
159.9 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:99a0e73d35d40ee68fbfdbd1b23ce3c9
|
339.0 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:3c457feee6f3e1d08cf26fe6e796d30b
|
70.8 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:00985b04651a8088466fdf716129fd6c
|
85.3 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:34e472150766270b2284d4a5867568fe
|
5.2 MB | Preview Download |
|
md5:23ea47e59ba5a8e01bc9ca0e2d34de5b
|
3.9 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:27a6adbcfc9234b1b64e5b11adc92731
|
3.9 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:a59bf581df54d818bac827ccde325097
|
1.4 MB | Preview Download |
|
md5:fead584524de249aa47a1265eef86572
|
8.8 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:a177681a75c27c756f31a81427810908
|
422.1 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:a1d2bea8a3a4b74ed2b1c0e43bffce1b
|
663.6 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is supplement to
- Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18211554 (DOI)
- Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18212106 (DOI)
- Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18212128 (DOI)
- Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18212949 (DOI)
Dates
- Issued
-
2026-02-24
References
- Atallah, B. V. & Scanziani, M. (2009). Instantaneous modulation of gamma oscillation frequency. Neuron, 62(4), 566–577.
- Baars, B. J. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
- Barato, A. C. & Seifert, U. (2015). Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for biomolecular processes. Phys Rev Lett, 114(15), 158101.
- Barthó, P. et al. (2009). Characterization of neocortical principal cells and interneurons. J Neurophysiol, 101, 3297–3308.
- Beggs, J. M. & Plenz, D. (2003). Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. J Neurosci, 23(35), 11167–11177.
- Bennett, C. H. et al. (1993). Teleporting an unknown quantum state. Phys Rev Lett, 70(13), 1895–1899.
- Bhatt, D. H. et al. (2009). Dendritic spine dynamics. Annu Rev Physiol, 71, 261–282.
- Börgers, C. & Kopell, N. (2003). Synchronization in networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Neural Computation, 15(3), 509–538.
- Brunel, N. & Wang, X.-J. (2003). What determines the frequency of fast network oscillations? J Neurophysiol, 90(1), 415–430.
- Burns, S. P. et al. (2010). Comparisons of LFP and MUA in macaque V1. J Neurosci, 30(41), 13739–13749.
- Buzsáki, G. & Wang, X.-J. (2012). Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu Rev Neurosci, 35, 203–225.
- Cardin, J. A. et al. (2009). Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm. Nature, 459(7247), 663–667.
- Cross, M. C. & Hohenberg, P. C. (1993). Pattern formation outside of equilibrium. Rev Mod Phys, 65(3), 851.
- Destexhe, A. & Paré, D. (1999). Impact of network activity on neocortical pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol, 81(4), 1531–1547.
- Dicke, R. H. (1954). Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes. Physical Review, 93(1), 99.
- Engel, A. K., Fries, P. & Singer, W. (2001). Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2(10), 704–716.
- Ford, P. L. (2024). Fibonacci Sequence. Kaggle Dataset. Available at: kaggle.com/datasets/patricklford/fibonacci-sequence
- Fries, P. et al. (2007). The gamma cycle. Trends Neurosci, 30(7), 309–316.
- Haider, B. et al. (2006). Neocortical network activity in vivo. J Neurosci, 26, 4535–4545.
- Hasenstaub, A. et al. (2005). Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials carry synchronized frequency information. Neuron, 47(3), 423–435.
- Howard, A., inversion, & Bratholm, L. (2019). Predicting Molecular Properties. Kaggle Competition (CHAMPS). Available at: kaggle.com/competitions/champs-scalar-coupling
- Izhikevich, E. M. (2007). Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience. MIT Press.
- Kirton, P. et al. (2019). Introduction to the Dicke model. Adv Quantum Tech, 2(1–2), 1800043.
- Omandac, C. (2026a–26c). [Prior Zenodo preprints]. DOIs: 10.5281/zenodo.18211554, 10.5281/zenodo.18212106, 10.5281/zenodo.18212128.
- Landauer, R. (1961). Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM J Res Dev, 5(3), 183–191.
- Markram, H. et al. (2015). Reconstruction and simulation of neocortical microcircuitry. Cell, 163(2), 456–492.
- Mohseni, M. et al. (2008). Environment-assisted quantum walks in photosynthetic energy transfer. J Chem Phys, 129(17), 174106.
- Mooney, P. T. (2020). Coronavirus Genome Sequence (MN908947). NCBI / Kaggle. Available at: kaggle.com/datasets/paultimothymooney/coronavirus-genome-sequence
- Nagadia, M. (2021). Codon Usage Dataset (Homo Sapiens ID 9606). Kaggle. Available at: kaggle.com/datasets/meetnagadia/condon-usage-dataset
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). HURDAT2: Atlantic and Pacific Hurricane Database (1851–2014). Available at: kaggle.com/datasets/noaa/hurricane-database
- Olshausen, B. A. & Field, D. J. (2004). Sparse coding of sensory inputs. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 14(4), 481–487.
- Pasquato, M. (2021). Star Cluster Evolution Simulations. Kaggle Dataset. Available at: kaggle.com/datasets/mariopasquato/star-cluster-simulations
- Penrose, R. & Hameroff, S. (1996). Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules. Math Comput Simul, 40(3–4), 453–480.
- Plenio, M. B. & Huelga, S. F. (2008). Dephasing-assisted transport. New J Phys, 10(11), 113019. Prigogine, I. (1977). Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems. Wiley.
- Rudolph, M. et al. (2005). A method to estimate synaptic conductances. J Neurophysiol, 94(1), 219–230.
- Sachdev, S. (2011). Quantum Phase Transitions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Schreiber, T. (2000). Measuring information transfer. Phys Rev Lett, 85(2), 461.
- Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron, 24(1), 49–65.
- Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information. Biol Bull, 215(3), 216–242.
- U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Significant Earthquake Database (1965–2016). Available at: kaggle.com/datasets/usgs/earthquake-database
- Wang, X.-J. & Buzsáki, G. (1996). Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition. J Neurosci, 16(20), 6402–6413.
- Whittington, M. A. et al. (2000). Inhibition-based rhythms. Int J Psychophysiol, 38(3), 315–336.