Root Frequency Theory: An Integrative Framework for the Continuity of Lived Experience
Authors/Creators
Description
Updates and more info: www.avanzorft.com
Contemporary science continues to face a fundamental difficulty in explaining how conscious experience remains coherent across time. Most existing approaches focus either on neural mechanisms or on phenomenological description, leaving open how physical constraints, biological regulation, neural dynamics, and meaning‑making processes jointly sustain a relatively stable sense of self.
The Root Frequency Theory (RFT) is proposed as an integrative approach that addresses this gap by treating experiential continuity as a function of coherence across five interdependent layers (C0–C4). These layers are hypothesized to remain connected through multiscale alignment and rhythmic coordination. Within this framework, the Default Mode Network (DMN) is analyzed as a central neurofunctional hub that can contribute to the spatiotemporal continuity associated with cross‑layer coordination and self‑related experience.
To make this proposal empirically approachable, I introduce the RFT Coherence Metric (M‑RFT), a heuristic index inspired by variational free energy minimization and the informational processes of self‑organization. In its current conceptual form, M‑RFT characterizes the putative degree of alignment across layers: biological (C1), neural (C2), and symbolic domains (C3), whose convergence is proposed to manifest at the experiential level (C4).
Methodologically, the project follows a theory-building strategy grounded in neurophenomenology, combining structured first-person reflection with transdisciplinary conceptual modeling. RFT is not offered as a definitive theory of consciousness, but as a structured proposal that makes systemic coherence investigable. It points toward new, in-principle testable approaches for examining how neural integration, self-understanding, and physiological regulation may covary over time in sustaining a coherent sense of self.
This preprint introduces a testable integrative framework intended to stimulate interdisciplinary collaboration across neuroscience, phenomenology, and complex systems research.
Files
avanzo_bianca_root_frequency_theory_V2.pdf
Files
(2.2 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:01dc2fee7d3b37dfaf313122b7aa6802
|
2.2 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Available
-
2026Public Release
References
- References Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., Ashdown, M., et al. (Planck Collaboration). (2020). Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6. Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge. Cleeremans, A. (2011). The radical plasticity thesis: How the brain learns to be conscious. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 86. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray. Edelman, G. M., Gally, J. A., & Baars, B. J. (2011). Biology of consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 4. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 127–136. Jung, C. G. (1968). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1959). Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. D. Reidel Publishing Co.Menon, V . (2011). Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: A unifying triple network model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 483–506. Menon, V . (2023). The triple network model: 2023 update on salience, central executive, and default mode networks. Annual Review of Neuroscience. Northoff, G. (2014). Unlocking the brain: Volume II. Consciousness. Oxford University Press. Northoff, G. (2016). Neuro-philosophy and the healthy mind: Learning from the unwell brain. W. W. Norton & Company. Northoff, G. (2020). The spontaneous brain: From the mind-body to the world-brain problem. MIT Press. Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Why zebras don't get ulcers (3rd ed.). Henry Holt and Company. Seth, A. K., Dienes, Z., Cleeremans, A., Overgaard, M., & Pessoa, L. (2008). Measuring consciousness: Relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(8), 314–321. Tononi, G. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience, 5(1), 42. Tononi, G. (2015). Integrated information theory. Scholarpedia, 10(1), 4164. Tononi, G., & Cirelli, C. (2014). Sleep and the price of plasticity: From synaptic and cellular homeostasis to memory consolidation and integration. Neuron, 81(1), 12–34.Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini M., & Koch C. (2016). Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450–461. Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330–349. Walker, M. (2017). Why we sleep: Unlocking the power of sleep and dreams. Scribner. Yehuda, R., Hoge, C. W., McFarlane, A. C., et al. (2015). Post-traumatic stress disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 1, 15057