Published March 4, 2026
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
Participación convencional en la gobernanza municipal: fundamentos teóricos desde una revisión sistemática
Authors/Creators
- 1. Universidad Cesar Vallejo. Chiclayo, Perú
- 2. Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo. Chiclayo, Perú
Description
El artículo presenta una revisión sistemática sobre la participación política convencional y su desarrollo en la gobernanza municipal en los años 2020–2025, abordando la fragmentación empírica existente pese a la creciente desconfianza institucional y expansión de la comunicación digital. El propósito fue identificar tendencias y vacíos en mecanismos como elecciones, militancia partidaria, campañas y canales formales políticos. Se empleó PRISMA 2020 para la selección de estudios en Scopus y SciELO mediante búsquedas con operadores booleanos, aplicando criterios de inclusión por periodo y alcance político social. La información se organizó en una matriz de sistematización y se complementó con una red de coocurrencia de palabras clave en VOSviewer. Quince estudios cumplieron los criterios, predominando diseños cuantitativos. Los resultados muestran que la afiliación partidaria y la confianza institucional predicen mayor participación convencional, mientras que las redes sociales tienen efectos ambivalentes. Se concluye que el campo requiere mayor integración metodológica comparada futura.
Files
articulo 13_Ventura, Alarcon y otros.pdf
Additional details
References
- Aksoy, C. G., Eichengreen, B., Litina, A., Özgüzel, C., & Yu, C. (2025). Corruption exposure, political trust, and immigrants. Journal of Development Economics, 174, Article 103440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103440
- Aranzueque, G., & Greppi, A. (2024). Political disaffection and new social ties. Isegoría, 70, Article 1584. https://isegoria.revistas.csic.es/index.php/isegoria/article/view/1584
- Arboleda Velásquez, O. C., García Chacón, B. E., Puerta Rendón, A. L., & Morales Mesa, S. A. (2021). Openings and limitations of the transformation of youth political culture through a citizenship training process. Última Década, 29(55), 96–123. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22362021000100096
- Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Gámez, E. (2020). The influence of conspiracy beliefs on conventional and unconventional forms of political participation: The mediating role of political efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(2), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12366
- Bartiromo, M., & Ivaldi, E. (2021). Political participation in the risk society: The Italian case. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(9), 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14090435
- Cawvey, M. (2023). Mobilizing the shy and closed-minded into politics: The mediating role of political trust for conventional participation in the Americas. Political Science Quarterly, 138(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqad058
- Desposato, S. W., Zurich, C., & Wu, J. Y. (2024). The participatory legacy of mobilization and repression: Evidence from a student movement. Social Movement Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2024.2350589
- Erdocia, I. (2025). Language and trust: Struggles for recognition of migrant people in the political realm. Language & Communication, 101, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2025.02.001
- Esguerra, A., & Van Der Hel, S. (2021). Participatory designs and epistemic authority in knowledge platforms for sustainability. Global Environmental Politics, 21(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00573
- Espinosa, A., Janos, E., & Kay, M. M. (2023). Indigenous political participation in Peru: A history of racism, exclusion, and violence. En Indigenous political representation in Latin America (pp. 215–239). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33914-1_9
- Evans Morales, F. (2021). Young political authorities in Peru: An analysis of their perceptions of institutional politics. Última Década, 29(55), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22362021000100131
- Faundes Peñafiel, J. J. (2022). Key aspects of the Chilean constitutional process (2019–2022) in light of Indigenous political participation. CUHSO, 32(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.7770/cuhso-v32n2-art2927
- Gil de Zúñiga, H., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2021). WhatsApp political discussion, conventional participation and activism. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642933
- González-List, V. (2022). Political participation on Twitter. Universitas-XXI, 36, 23–45. https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n36.2022.02
- Halim, H., Mohamad, B., Dauda, S. A., Azizan, F. L., & Dalib, S. (2025). Political leadership and campaign strategies. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025115
- Madrid, A. (2022). Building a more substantive and integral democracy in Ecuador. Antropologías del Sur, 9(18). https://doi.org/10.25074/rantros.v9i18.2062
- Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Scherman, A., Etchegaray, N., Browne, M., Mazorra, D., & Rojas, H. (2022). WhatsApp, polarization, and non-conventional political participation. Media and Communication, 10(4), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5817
- Suárez-Cao, J. (2021). Reconstructing legitimacy after crisis. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 13(2–3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-021-00160-8
- Wang, Y., & Kennedy, K. J. (2023). Chinese students' intentions for future political participation. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00107_1
- Zidouemba, M. T. (2025). Governance and artificial intelligence in democracy. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00229-5