Published April 8, 2007 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Enforcement Mechanisms in Domestic Courts of Kenya: A Survey

  • 1. Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)
  • 2. Department of Advanced Studies, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)
  • 3. Moi University
  • 4. Department of Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)

Description

This study examines the enforcement mechanisms for human rights law in domestic courts of Kenya. A survey was conducted among a sample of judges, lawyers, and court staff to gather insights into their experiences and perceptions regarding enforcement processes in human rights cases. The findings indicate that while there is some variation in the application of legal remedies across different courts, judicial discretion significantly influences outcomes. Specifically, 60% of respondents reported instances where judges used their discretionary powers to mitigate harsher judgments. Despite challenges such as limited resources and procedural inefficiencies, judicial discretion plays a crucial role in ensuring human rights compliance within the Kenyan legal system. Recommendations include enhancing judicial training on human rights law, improving court infrastructure, and promoting public awareness of their rights to facilitate better enforcement mechanisms.

Files

zenodo.18859220.pdf

Files (96.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8a9315b5baafa6032b59d67c1d91b187
17.3 kB Download
md5:3efb98a3c45cd28300d9db902ae475bc
78.9 kB Preview Download