Published March 3, 2026 | Version V(III)
Preprint Open

Operational Discrimination in Structurally Non-Terminating Closure Systems

Description

Paper (III) establishes an operational discriminator between completion-admitting and structurally non-terminating closure systems within a controlled class of discrete conservative models.

Arguments developed in Gravitype Papers I and II identify structural conditions required for sustained temporal ordering without global completion. A persistent objection to such arguments is operational: even if completion is structurally forbidden, systems exhibiting long but finite delays may be observationally indistinguishable from those that are fundamentally non-terminating. Paper (III) addresses this objection directly.

We introduce a minimal observable — the paired first-arrival delay
Δτ₍first₎ = τ₍ON₎ − τ₍OFF₎ — evaluated under a pre-registered, locked protocol. The ON and OFF variants share identical state spaces, update rules, initialization, and stochastic realizations, differing only in an admissibility constraint governing reconciliation transitions.

Across all tested system sizes (N = 48–256) and paired realizations, the admissibility-constrained (ON) variant exhibits a persistent directional delay relative to the completion-admitting (OFF) variant. Statistical evaluation using a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test under a locked protocol yields unanimous sign agreement across uncensored pairs and p ≈ 7 × 10⁻¹⁰ in the primary Modal execution, with independent local verification confirming the effect.

The result does not establish a physical law and does not instantiate the Gravitype substrate directly. Rather, it demonstrates that the structural distinction between bounded and unbounded admissible reconciliation depth admits operational consequence under hostile-to-researcher-freedom conditions.

Paper (III) therefore converts structural necessity arguments into experimentally discriminable structure, providing the operational hinge for subsequent analysis of emergent accessibility gradients and structural regimes in Papers (IV) and (V).

Files

DeStCroix_Gravitype_2026_vIII_Operational_Discrimination.pdf

Files (347.8 kB)

Additional details

Related works

Is supplemented by
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18804549 (DOI)
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18854092 (DOI)

Dates

Available
2026-03-03
Original Preprint Submission

References

  • L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer, R. D. Sorkin (1987). Space-Time as a Causal Set. Physical Review Letters, 59(5), 521–524. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.521
  • R. D. Sorkin (2003).Causal Sets: Discrete Gravity. In Lectures on Quantum Gravity, Series of the Centro De Estudios Científicos, pp. 305–327.
  • H. Weyl (1918).Raum, Zeit, Materie. Springer, Berlin. English translation: Space, Time, Matter. Dover Publications, New York, 1952.
  • R. Penrose (2004).The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. Jonathan Cape, London / Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  • C. Rovelli (2018).The Order of Time. Riverhead Books, New York.
  • G. 't Hooft (2016).The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41285-6
  • L. Lovász (1993).Random Walks on Graphs: A Survey. In Combinatorics, Paul Erdős is Eighty, Vol. 2, pp. 353–398. János Bolyai Mathematical Society.
  • F. Wilcoxon (1945).Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83.
  • W. J. Conover (1999).Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • de St. Croix, Nicholas Dean (2026). Gravitype I: Structural Conditions for the Persistence of Time. Zenodo Preprint (2026). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18804549
  • de St. Croix, Nicholas Dean (2026). Gravitype II: Structural Consequences of Time-Preserving Closure. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18854092