Duct-level evaluation of mammary gland health, somatic cell count and bacterial flora in lactating jennies
Authors/Creators
Description
Dataset
Title
Dataset:
Duct-level evaluation of mammary gland health, somatic cell count and bacterial flora in lactating jennies
⸻
Authors
Attili A.R., Gallina E.T., Storoni C., Massacci F.; Bazzano M., Duranti A.; Li Y.; Cuteri V.
Corresponding author:
Prof. Vincenzo Cuteri
School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine
University of Camerino, Italy
vincenzo.cuteri@unicam.it
⸻
Dataset Description
This dataset contains duct-level milk analysis results from a cross-sectional observational study conducted on 29 clinically healthy lactating jennies from six farms located in Central Italy (Umbria and Lazio regions).
Each jenny was sampled at the individual duct level. Milk was collected separately from:
• Right Lateral Duct (RLD)
• Right Medial Duct (RMD)
• Left Lateral Duct (LLD)
• Left Medial Duct (LMD)
A total of 116 duct-level samples were analysed.
The study aimed to evaluate mammary gland health by integrating:
• Somatic cell count (SCC)
• Bacteriological culture with MALDI-TOF identification
• Total bacterial count (TBC)
• Selected host-related variables
Study Design
Non-randomised observational cross-sectional study.
Milk sampling was performed under routine farm management conditions. No experimental treatments were administered.
⸻
Variables Included in the Dataset
Animal-Level Variables
• Animal_ID
Anonymised identification code for each jenny.
• Farm_ID
Anonymised farm code.
• AgeCat
Age category (as defined in manuscript).
• ParityCat
Parity category.
• LactStage
Lactation stage:
• 1 = 0–3 months
• 2 = 4–6 months
• 3 = 7–9 months
• Aptitude
Production aptitude (milk production or companion).
⸻
Duct-Level Variables
• Duct
Sampling site:
• RLD = Right Lateral Duct
• RMD = Right Medial Duct
• LLD = Left Lateral Duct
• LMD = Left Medial Duct
• SCC
Somatic cell count expressed as cells/mL.
Determined using the direct microscopic method (Breed and Prescott).
• SCC_cat_200k
Exploratory categorical variable:
• 0 = <200,000 cells/mL
• 1 = ≥200,000 cells/mL
(Note: no validated SCC cut-off exists for donkeys; this threshold was used for exploratory purposes only.)
• TBC
Total bacterial count expressed as colony-forming units per mL (CFU/mL).
• Bact_Pos
Bacteriological culture result:
• 0 = No bacterial growth
• 1 = Positive culture
• Bacterial_Isolate
Bacterial species identified by MALDI-TOF MS (when applicable).
⸻
Laboratory Methods Summary
Somatic Cell Count (SCC)
• Direct microscopic method (Breed and Prescott)
• Newman–Lampert staining
• Results expressed as cells/mL
• Mean of two independent readings used
Bacteriology
• Culture according to National Mastitis Council guidelines
• Selective and differential media
• Incubation at 36 ±1 °C for 24–48 h
• Identification by MALDI-TOF MS
• Species-level identification accepted at log score ≥2.0
Total Bacterial Count (TBC)
• Plating of 100 μL milk on Milk Plate Count Agar
• Manual colony counting
• Expressed as CFU/mL
⸻
Statistical Notes
Due to non-normal distributions:
• SCC and TBC were log10-transformed prior to regression modelling.
• Mixed-effects linear regression models were used.
• Animal ID was included as a random effect to account for clustering of four ducts within each jenny.
Statistical analysis was performed using:
• STATA v13
• GraphPad Prism v10
⸻
Ethical Statement
All procedures were conducted in accordance with national animal welfare regulations. Milk sampling was part of routine farm management practices and did not involve invasive procedures beyond standard milking.
⸻
Data Anonymisation
All animal and farm identifiers have been anonymised.
No personally identifiable information is included in this dataset.
⸻
Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite:
Attili A.R., Gallina E.T., Storoni C., Massacci F.; Bazzano M., Duranti A.; Li Y.; Cuteri V.
Duct-level evaluation of mammary gland health, somatic cell count and bacterial flora in lactating jennies.
Equine Veterinary Journal. (Under review)
Files
Files
(34.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:0d3af259f408a8f1cec053c480e07916
|
16.0 kB | Download |
|
md5:81e246c8ce80919703551fc41e061f90
|
18.3 kB | Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Copyrighted
-
2026
References
- 1. Xie A, Shen X, Hong R, Xie Y, Zhang Y, Chen J, Li Z, Li M, Yue X, Quek SY Unlocking the potential of donkey Milk: Nutritional composition, bioactive properties and future prospects. Food Res Int. 2025;209:116307. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116307.
- 2. Guo HY, Pang K, Zhang XY, Zhao L, Chen SW, Dong ML, Ren FZ Composition, physiochemical properties, nitrogen fraction distribution, and amino acid profile of donkey milk. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(4):1635-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-600.
- 3. McCue PM, Ferris RA Disorders of the mammary gland in mares. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2012;28(3):451–463. doi:10.1016/j.cveq.2012.08.002.
- 4. Pilla R, Malvisi M, Snel GGM, Schwarz D, König S, Czerny CP, Piccinini R Differential cell count as an alternative method to diagnose mastitis in mares. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93:1659–1665. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2806.
- 5. Martuzzi F, Summer A, Formaggioni P, Mariani P Milk yield and somatic cell count in dairy donkeys. Ital J Anim Sci. 2004;3(Suppl 1):361–364.
- 6. Sun X, Zhao R, Wang N, Zhang J, Xiao B, Huang F, Chen A Milk somatic cell count: from conventional microscope method to new biosensor-based method. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2023;135:102–114. doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.03.020.
- 7. Pilla R, Daprà V, Zecconi A, Piccinini R Hygienic and health characteristics of donkey milk during a follow-up study. J Dairy Res. 2010;77:392–397. doi: 10.1017/S0022029910000221.
- 8. Beghelli D, Roscini A, Valiani A, Vincenzetti S, Cavallucci C, Polidori P Somatic and differential cell count during a lactation period in donkey milk. Ital J Anim Sci. 2009;8:691–693. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s2.691
- 9. Haw SR, Adkins PRF, Gosselin VB, Poock SE, Middleton JR Intramammary infections in lactating Jersey cows: prevalence and association with milk somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci. 2023;107:3157–3168. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23848
- 10. Hughes K Development and pathology of the equine mammary gland. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2020;26:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-020-09471-2
- 11. Ragona G, Corrias F, Benedetti M, Paladini M, Salari F, Altomonte I, Martini M Amiata donkey milk chain: animal health evaluation and milk quality. Ital J Food Saf. 2016;5:5951. doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2016.5951
- 12. Pan Y, Wu Y, Sun Y, Chen R, Li Q, Wang X, Zhang Q, Li S, Wang Z Comparison and correlation analysis of microbiota composition and short-chain fatty acid profile in Milk across 15 mammalian species. Food Chem X. 2025 Sep 4;30:102995. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102995.
- 13. Al-Harbi H, Ranjbar S, Moore RJ, Alawneh JI Bacteria isolated from milk of dairy cows with and without clinical mastitis and their AMR profiles. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:743725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.743725
- 14. Vincenzetti S, Pucciarelli S, Polidori P, Polzonetti V Role of lysozyme in donkey milk. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91(12):4556–4563. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1248.
- 15. Khan MZ, Chen W, Li M, Ren W, Huang B, Kou X, Ullah Q, Wei L, Wang T, Khan A, Zhang Z, Li L, Wang C Is there sufficient evidence to support the health benefits of including donkey milk in the diet? Front Nutr. 2024 Sep 25;11:1404998. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1404998.
- 16. Polidori P, Vincenzetti S Protein profile and biological activity of donkey milk. In: Milk Protein. InTech; 2012:215-232. Doi:10.5772/45993.
- 17. Kaskous S, Pfaffl MW Milk properties and morphological characteristics of the donkey mammary gland for development of an adopted milking machine—A Review. Dairy. 2022;3(2):233-247. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy3020019
- 18. Prescott SC, Breed RS The determination of the number of body cells in milk by a direct method. J Infect Dis. 1910;7:632-640.
- 19. Malacarne M, Martuzzi F, Summer A, Mariani P. Protein and fat composition of mare's milk: nutritional remarks. Int Dairy J. 2002;12:869–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(02)00120-6
- 20. Salimei E, Fantuz F, Coppola R, Chiofalo B, Polidori P, Varisco G Composition and characteristics of ass's milk. Animal Research 2004;53:67–78. Doi: 10.1051/animres:2003049
- 21. National Mastitis Council. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. 3rd Ed. Madison, WI: NMC; 2017.
- 22. Paape MJ, Wiggans GR, Bannerman DD, Thomas DL, Sanders AH, Contreras A, Moroni P, Miller RH Monitoring goat and sheep milk somatic cell counts. Small Rum Res. 2007;68(1-2):114-125. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.014
- 23. Barbosa BL, Pedrosa VB, Karolewski LSL, Godoi CC, Martins AS Impact of parity number, milk production and somatic cell count on the reproduction of Holstein cows. J Dairy Res. 2024;1-5. doi:10.1017/S0022029924000158
- 24. Martini M, Altomonte I, Salari F, Caroli AM Monitoring nutritional quality of donkey milk: effects of lactation and season. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:6819–6822. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8544.
- 25. Martini M, Salari F, Licitra R, La Motta C, Altomonte I Lysozyme activity in donkey milk. Int Dairy J. 2019;96:98-101. Doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2019.04.009.