ADVANCING PERSONALIZED LEARNING THROUGH LEARNING ANALYTICS: A SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY PERSPECTIVE
Description
This article examines how learning analytics (LA) can be used to operationalize personalized learning in real classroom conditions through the lens of Self-Determination Theory (SDT). Drawing on international research, it synthesizes how LA supports personalization by enabling scalable diagnosis of learners’ needs, informing adaptive instructional support, and improving the timeliness and specificity of formative feedback. At the same time, the review highlights recurring implementation barriers, particularly the difficulty of translating dashboard indicators into feasible instructional actions, as well as the ethical and governance requirements associated with collecting and processing learner data. Using SDT as a guiding framework, the paper discusses how LA-enabled personalization can strengthen competence through mastery-oriented guidance, while potentially undermining autonomy and relatedness when personalization becomes overly performance-driven or surveillance-like and when social learning opportunities are reduced. To address these tensions, the article proposes an SDT-aligned implementation pathway that links pedagogical purpose, responsible data use, interpretable insights, actionable instructional options, and iterative refinement based on both learning outcomes and learner experience. The paper concludes that LA can make personalization more effective and humane when analytics is pedagogically aligned, ethically governed, and designed to protect students’ psychological needs alongside academic goals.
Files
252-258 (1).pdf
Files
(227.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:34a90e115a030155ae2da94b63d144ed
|
227.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1.[1] Ali, A. Exploring the Transformative Potential of Technology in Overcoming Educational Disparities. Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Arts 2023, 2, 107–117.
- 2.Anderson, J.R.; Corbett, A.T.; Koedinger, K.R.; Pelletier, R. Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. J. Learn. Sci. 1995, 4, 167–207.
- 3.Brown, M. Student to Teacher Ratio in High Schools. Available online: https://www.learner.com/blog/student-to-teacher-ratio-in-high-schools (accessed on 2 November 2022).
- 4.Bulger, M. Personalized Learning: The Conversations We're Not Having. Data & Society 2016, 22, 1–29.
- 5.Chatti, M.A.; Jarke, M.; Specht, M. The 3P Learning Model. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2010, 13, 74–85.
- 6.Conole, G.; Gašević, D.; Long, P.; Siemens, G. Message from the LAK 2011 General & Program Chairs. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Banff, AB, Canada, 27 February–1 March 2011; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2011.
- 7.Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychol. Inq. 2000, 11, 227–268.
- 8.Fung, C.Y.; Abdullah, M.N.L.Y.; Hashim, S. Improving Self-regulated Learning through personalized weekly e-Learning Journals: A time series quasi-experimental study. E-J. Bus. Educ. Scholarsh. Teach. 2019, 13, 30–45.
- 9.Gross, B.; Tuchman, S.; Patrick, S. A National Landscape Scan of Personalized Learning in K-12 Education in the United States. iNACOL, 2018. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED589851 (accessed on 1 May 2023).
- 10.Hardison, H. How Teachers Spend Their Time: A Breakdown. Available online: https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/how-teachers-spend-their-time-a-breakdown/2022/04 (accessed on 19 April 2023).
- 11.Khor, E.T.; Looi, C.K. A Learning Analytics Approach to Model and Predict Learners' Success in Digital Learning. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education, Singapore, 2–5 December 2019; pp. 476–480.
- 12.Li, K.C.; Wong, B.T.-M. Features and trends of personalised learning: A review of journal publications from 2001 to 2018. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2021, 29, 182–195.
- 13.Makhambetova, A.; Zhiyenbayeva, N.; Ergesheva, E. Personalized Learning Strategy as a Tool to Improve Academic Performance and Motivation of Students. Int. J. Web-Based Learn. Teach. Technol. 2021, 16, 1–17.
- 14.Mangaroska, K.; Vesin, B.; Giannakos, M. Cross-platform analytics: A step towards personalization and adaptation in education. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Tempe, AZ, USA, 4–8 March 2019; pp. 71–75.
- 15.Roschelle, J. Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change. J. Learn. Sci. 1992, 2, 235–276.
- 16.Siemens, G.; Baker, R.S.J.D. Learning analytics and educational data mining. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 29 April–2 May 2012.
- 17.Sleeman, D.; Brown, J.S. Intelligent Tutoring Systems; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1982.
- 18.Yeager, S.; Dweck, C. Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educ. Psychol. 2012, 47, 302–314.
- 19.Yuyun, I.; Suherdi, D. Components and Strategies for Personalized Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. In Proceedings of the 20th AsiaTEFL-68th TEFLIN-5th iNELTAL Conference (ASIATEFL 2022), Malang, Java, Indonesia, 5–7 August 2022; Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 271–290.