Published March 1, 2026 | Version v1
Dataset Open

DIPLOMACY AND LANGUAGE: TURKISH AND UZBEK DIPLOMATIC DISCOURSE IN COMPARISON

Authors/Creators

Description

This article examines the relationship between diplomacy and language through a comparative analysis of Turkish and Uzbek diplomatic discourse. Diplomatic discourse represents a specialized form of institutional communication characterized by formality, precision, politeness strategies, and the use of culturally and politically sensitive language. The study focuses on identifying the linguistic, pragmatic, and stylistic features that shape diplomatic communication in Turkish and Uzbek. Particular attention is given to lexical choices, formulaic expressions, speech etiquette, and pragmatic strategies used to convey diplomatic intentions, maintain neutrality, and ensure mutual understanding. The findings highlight the importance of linguistic competence, cultural awareness, and pragmatic sensitivity in diplomatic communication and translation. This study contributes to the fields of discourse analysis, translation studies, and international communication by providing insights into the role of language in diplomacy and intercultural relations.

Files

229-233 (1).pdf

Files (234.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ea90f4919f3f8b70ad41399df69a6b61
234.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1.Axmedjanova, D. B. (2026). Linguistic Features of Diplomatic Discourse: A Comparative Study of Turkish and Uzbek. American Journal of Alternative Education, 3(1), 116–120. Retrieved from https://scientificbulletin.com/index.php/AJAE/article/view/1600
  • 2.House J. Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. – London: Routledge, 2015. – 180 p.
  • .Neumann I. B. Diplomatic Sites: A Critical Enquiry. – London: Hurst & Company, 2012. – 240 p.
  • 4.Schäffner C. Political discourse analysis from the point of view of translation studies // Journal of Language and Politics. – 2004. – Vol. 3. – No. 1. – P. 117–150.
  • 5.Searle J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. – 203 p.
  • 6.Hamidov, X. (2024). Turk tili frazeologiyasi va o 'zbekcha-turkcha tarjima masalalari. Monografiya), Publication date, 1, 232.
  • 7.Hamidov, X., & Karausta, A. (2023). TURKCHAGA ARAB TILIDAN O 'ZLASHGAN JURNALISTIKAGA OID TERMINLAR XUSUSIDA. In Konferensiyalar| Conferences (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 28-33).
  • 8.Khabibullayeva, M. E., Abidova, Z. X., Karimova, N. D., Khodjakhanov, M. M., Abdullayeva, M. R., & Abduraxmatovna, D. M. (2025). EXPRESSION OF PROVERBS AND PHRASE IN THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF UZBEK WORKS. Lex Localis: Journal of Local Self-Government, 23.
  • 9.Xabibullayevna, V. N., Mirakbarovna, F. D., Mirshadmanovna, X. Z., Shamsuddinovna, I. F., Saydulllayevich, N. M. B. R., & Sayfutdinqizi, F. K. (2025). APPLICATION OF GAME TECHNOLOGIES IN EDUCATION: IN THE CONTEXT OF UZBEKISTAN. Lex Localis: Journal of Local Self-Government, 23.
  • 10.Khamidov, X. K., Bultakov, I. Y., Raxmanberdiyeva, K. S., Kasimova, S. S., & Sodiqova, S. B. (2024). Linguistic Expertise of Educational Literature: Analysis and Results. Journal Power System Technology, 48(4), 4017-4027.