Published February 28, 2026 | Version v1
Preprint Open

A Computationally Bounded Test of Periodic and Aperiodic Forcing in the Forced Kuramoto–Sivashinsky Equation

Authors/Creators

Description

Paper 14 in The Geometry of the Critical Line programme.

We test the conjecture from Paper 13 that deterministic aperiodic spatial forcing suppresses steep-gradient formation in the forced Kuramoto–Sivashinsky (KS) equation, analogous to lock-in suppression in forced Kuramoto networks (Paper 11). Using pseudospectral simulations across nine forcing families and amplitudes F ∈ [0.5, 8.0], we obtain a robust negative result: periodic sinusoidal forcing produces the lowest time-averaged gradients, while aperiodic and random forcing preserve stronger steep-gradient activity. The contrast strengthens monotonically with forcing amplitude.

Diagnostics reveal the mechanism. Periodic forcing imposes a coherent phase-lagged spatial lock, generating a rigid low-mode hierarchy via the −½(θ_x)² nonlinear coupling. By Parseval's theorem, periodic forcing concentrates spectral energy into a narrow band sufficient to overpower intrinsic KS steepening, while aperiodic forcing dilutes the same energy across a broadband spectrum. A stick-slip regime at moderate amplitudes (F ≈ 2.0) produces intermittent violent gradient snapping despite low average gradients. Spectral entropy is higher in the periodic case (0.53 vs 0.06–0.08), tracking harmonic ladder breadth rather than macroscopic disorder; this ordering is verified robust under noise-floor thresholds from 10⁻¹² to 10⁻².

All claims are bounded to the numerically stable integration window (t ≤ 100, N = 256), with Lyapunov time τ_c ≪ 100 anchoring the physical relevance of the window. The Kuramoto-to-KS phenomenological bridge has a regime-dependent weight limit: the discrete-to-continuum interface is a genuine boundary where the sign of the forcing-structure effect reverses.

The epistemic protocol (predefined kill criteria, observables, competing hypotheses register) was designed before simulations and preserved claim discipline when the data contradicted the initial hypothesis.

Added LaTeX source and figure assets for reproducibility; PDF content unchanged.

Files

Paper14_KS_Forcing_Test_PK.pdf

Files (6.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e6ecebcd2f593b12aec6157d42e96ed1
135.0 kB Preview Download
md5:954edab2a7e0701b4e7040e24c237949
122.1 kB Preview Download
md5:26086727133e159de20d0a83da886574
135.3 kB Preview Download
md5:93de48a7ccb1abd1d7c4c19f196a4d11
799.4 kB Preview Download
md5:376d9c55f2781462c264979a7fb5195b
1.7 MB Preview Download
md5:c74dd2ac34b93c4030aac1c0052e90d3
191.3 kB Preview Download
md5:990d03caf680a4e3187fbffb61fc5491
28.4 kB Download
md5:dba6344abec3a453f4f0519564c1af13
3.2 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Additional titles

Subtitle (English)
Paper 14 in the "Geometry of the Critical Line" programme

Related works

Is supplement to
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18802023 (DOI)
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18807148 (DOI)
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18807849 (DOI)
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18761429 (DOI)