Conflict Handling Measure (CHM) for Situational Conflict Handling: Validation Notes and Materials.
Authors/Creators
Description
This Record is a living collection of validation notes and accompanying materials for the five-item Conflict Handling Measure (CHM) assessing situational conflict handling (avoiding, integrating, obliging, dominating, compromising). Each validation note is provided as a separate PDF with linked analysis outputs (tables) and a brief documentation.
Included in Version 1: Validation Note 1 (Germany; N = 2,396): correlational evidence for convergent/discriminant validity.
Citation: Cite the version-specific DOI for the exact evidence used. The concept DOI represents the continuously updated record across all versions.
Files
Validation_Note_1_CHM_V2.0.pdf
Files
(282.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:728704cd7589a11a7b6a4869918dbd5c
|
282.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Ben-Yoav, O., & Banai, M. (1992). Measuring conflict management styles: A comparison between the MODE and ROCI-II instruments using self and peer ratings. International Journal of Conflict Management, 3(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022714
- Bilsky, W., & Wülker, A. (2000). Konfliktstile: Adaptation und Erprobung des Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory (ROCI-II) (Berichte Aus Dem Psychologischen Institut IV) [Forschungsbericht]. Psychologisches Institut IV, Universität Münster.
- Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The Managerial Grid: Key orientations for achieving production through people. TX: Gulf Publishing Co.
- De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S., & Nauta, A. (2001). A theory‐based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(6), 645–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.107
- Filsecker, M., Abs, H. J., & Roczen, N. (2020). The structure of conflict styles in adolescents. Psychometric properties of the Adapted Rahim Organizational Conflict Style Inventory-II (ROCI-II). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(4), 526 536. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:23783
- Geppert, R., Engelhardt, R., Guggenmos, M.-T., Miram, R., Ittner, H., & Maes, J. (2026). The Development and Preliminary Validation of the Conflict Style Screener (COSTY). Zenodo: Preprint. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18621567
- Heynen, E. J. E., Van Der Helm, G. H. P., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Korebrits, A. M. (2016). Measuring Empathy in a German Youth Prison: A Validation of the German Version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES) in a Sample of Incarcerated Juvenile Offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 16(5), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219217
- Kilmann, R. H. (2018, April 10). History Of The Thomas-Kilmann Instrument | Developing The TKI Tool. Kilmann Diagnostics. https://kilmanndiagnostics.com/a-brief-history of-the-thomas-kilmann-conflict-mode-instrument/
- Kilmann, R. H., & Thomas, K. W. (1977). Developing a Forced-Choice Measure of Conflict Handling Behavior: The "Mode" Instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37(2), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700204
- Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., & Back, M. D. (2015). Das Dreckige Dutzend und die Niederträchtigen Neun: Kurzskalen zur Erfassung von Narzissmus, Machiavellismus und Psychopathie. Diagnostica, 61(2), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012 1924/a000124
- Rahim, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 206–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022874
- Rammstedt, B., Koch, K., Borg, I., & Reitz, T. (2004). Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala für die Messung der Big-Five-Persönlichkeitsdimensionen in Umfragen. GESIS ZUMA Nachrichten.
- Tehrani, H. D., & Yamini, S. (2020). Personality traits and conflict resolution styles: A meta analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109794
- Weider-Hatfield, D. (1988). Assessing the Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory-II (ROCI-II). Management Communication Quarterly, 1(3), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318988001003005