Published February 28, 2026 | Version v1

MODERN TREATMENT APPROACHES FOR FRACTURES OF THE DISTAL ONE-THIRD OF THE FEMUR

Description

Fractures of the distal one-third of the femur represent a challenging group of injuries in orthopedic trauma due to their anatomical complexity, proximity to the knee joint, frequent comminution, and association with soft-tissue damage. These fractures occur in a bimodal population: young patients exposed to high-energy trauma and elderly patients with low-energy injuries often complicated by osteoporosis and multiple comorbidities. Over recent decades, treatment strategies have evolved significantly, shifting from extensive open surgical exposure toward biologically oriented fixation, minimally invasive techniques, and individualized decision-making. Modern treatment modalities include lateral locking plate fixation, minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), retrograde intramedullary nailing, and, in selected elderly patients, distal femoral replacement. This article reviews current concepts in the diagnosis, classification, surgical management, and rehabilitation of distal femoral fractures. Advantages and limitations of each technique are discussed, along with common complications and strategies for their prevention. The review emphasizes that optimal outcomes depend not on a single implant choice but on careful fracture assessment, preservation of soft tissues and blood supply, stable fixation, and early functional rehabilitation.

Files

16-19 (1).pdf

Files (164.0 kB)

Name Size
md5:0619ebad7822961bf9d2a86067842f4d
164.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1.Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Tornetta P. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. Wolters Kluwer; 2015.
  • 2.Buckley R, Moran C, Apivatthakakul T. AO Principles of Fracture Management. 3rd ed. Thieme; 2018.
  • 3.Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(8):1093–1110.
  • 4.Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis. Injury. 1997;28(Suppl 1):A20–A30.
  • 5.Sommer C, Gautier E, Müller M, Helfet DL, Wagner M. First clinical results of the locking compression plate. Injury. 2003;34(Suppl 2):B43–B54.
  • 6.Egol KA, Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Handbook of Fractures. 6th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
  • 7.Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Outcome of distal femoral fractures treated with locking plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(12):e198–e203.
  • 8.Ziran BH, Smith WR, Morgan SJ. Minimally invasive fixation techniques in orthopedic trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(11):661–673.
  • 9.Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gächter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(8):553–559.
  • 10.Henderson CE, Lujan TJ, Bottlang M, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL. Healing complications with locked plating of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(1):5–10.