Intraocular Lens Power Calculation After Laser Thermal Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Accuracy
Authors/Creators
- 1. CODET Vision Institute ORC ID - https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1870-173X
- 2. CODET Vision Institutemhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6903-3957
- 3. CODET Vision Institute https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-7910
- 4. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4418-1305
- 5. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7728-1937
- 6. Universidad Popular Autónoma de Puebla https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4177-9851
- 7. Universidad Politécnica de Pachuca https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6612-255X
- 8. Universidad Politécnica de Pachuca https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3939-4130
- 9. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6390-1419
Description
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas and methodologies in patients with a history of Laser Thermal Keratoplasty (LTK) undergoing cataract surgery.
Methods: Systematic literature review of global evidence (1998–2025). A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Studies reporting refractive outcomes, mean prediction error (MPE), and the efficacy of various formulas (Clinical History Method, Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, and Barrett True-K) in post-LTK eyes were included. Of the 874 articles, 99 was studies screening, 35 relevant articles were synthesized to identify the most reliable predictive strategies.
Results: Historically, the Clinical History Method was the gold standard; however, its current applicability is limited by the lack of pre-refractive records. Standard third-generation formulas (SRK/T, Holladay 1) consistently resulted in a hyperopic surprise, with an MPE ranging from +1.00 to +1.50 D. Modern "No-History" formulas, particularly Barrett True-K and Shammas-PL, along with Total Corneal Refractive Power (TCRP) measurements from Scheimpflug imaging, showed significantly higher accuracy. Due to the regression nature of LTK, corneal stability remains a critical factor in long-term refractive predictability.
Conclusions: To avoid hyperopic surprises in post-LTK patients, surgeons should utilize modern formulas that account for the altered anterior-posterior corneal ratio. Targeting a slightly myopic refractive goal (−0.50 to −0.75 D) and using the ASCRS online calculator are recommended as the safest clinical practices.
Files
2705-Article Text-7086-1-10-20260226.pdf
Files
(311.6 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:8af802a7014755ef3708a2b7b709194b
|
311.6 kB | Preview Download |