Federated Learning and Data Privacy in Distributed Machine Learning
Authors/Creators
Description
In recent years, the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning systems has significantly transformed decision-making processes across critical domains such as healthcare, finance, public administration, and digital platforms. While the effectiveness of these systems largely depends on access to large-scale and high-quality data, the increasing strategic value of data has intensified concerns regarding privacy, security, and regulatory compliance. Traditional centralized machine learning architectures, which rely on aggregating data into a single repository, pose substantial technical, legal, and ethical risks, particularly under strict data protection regimes such as the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Federated learning has emerged as a promising alternative within the framework of distributed machine learning by enabling collaborative model training without direct data sharing. By keeping data localized and exchanging only model updates, federated learning addresses key challenges related to data silos, data sovereignty, and privacy-by-design principles. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of federated learning from a data privacy perspective, examining its theoretical foundations, operational mechanisms, and major variants, including horizontal and vertical federated learning. Furthermore, the study explores practical applications of federated learning in sensitive sectors such as healthcare, finance, Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems, and public governance, highlighting both its advantages and inherent limitations. Particular attention is given to privacy risks such as model inversion and poisoning attacks, as well as mitigation strategies including differential privacy and secure aggregation. Finally, the article assesses the relevance of federated learning within the evolving legal and institutional environment of the European Union, arguing that federated learning represents a strategic balance between technological innovation, regulatory compliance, and responsible artificial intelligence development.
Files
Files
(27.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:4cf79dd91792b0ea20059621285f9980
|
27.8 kB | Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. European Union. General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj 2. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. Deep Learning. MIT Press, 2016. https://www.deeplearningbook.org 3. McMahan, B. et al. Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data. AISTATS, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.05629 4. High-Level Expert Group on AI. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. European Commission, 2019. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu 5. Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. Machine Learning: Trends, Perspectives, and Prospects. Science, 2015. https://science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaa8415 6. Kairouz, P. et al. Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. Foundations and Trends in ML, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04977 7. Manyika, J. et al. Big Data: The Next Frontier. McKinsey Global Institute, 2017. 8. Sheller, M. et al. Federated Learning in Medicine. Scientific Reports, 2020. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-69250-1 9. Yang, Q. et al. Federated Learning Systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.04885 10. Hard, A. et al. Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Prediction. Google AI, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03604 11. OECD. Data Governance and AI in the Public Sector. OECD Publishing, 2021. https://www.oecd.org 12. Fredrikson, M. et al. Model Inversion Attacks. CCS, 2015. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2810103.2813677 13. Bagdasaryan, E. et al. Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning. NeurIPS, 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.00459 14. Dwork, C., & Roth, A. The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy. 2014. https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~aaroth/Papers/privacybook.pdf 15. Bonawitz, K. et al. Practical Secure Aggregation. CCS, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.04482 16. Gentry, C. Fully Homomorphic Encryption Using Ideal Lattices. STOC, 2009. https://crypto.stanford.edu/craig/