Dizdarevic vs Dawkins Atheism Comparison: Revolutionary Evidence That Changes Everything About God's Existence

This article presents a comparative analysis of two contemporary atheistic frameworks—Richard Dawkins’ evidential atheism and a newly proposed metaphysical model that introduces five independent lines of evidence against the existence of a creator‑god. While Dawkins’ approach focuses primarily on biological evolution, probability, and the absence of empirical support for divine intervention, the present work argues that atheism can be grounded in deeper metaphysical, logical, and cosmological principles that render the classical theistic God concept internally incoherent and ontologically impossible.