Evolutionary Origins and Functional Architecture of Metacognitive Control: A Non-Normative Framework for Model Reliability
Description
This paper proposes an evolutionary-functional framework for understanding metacognitive control mechanisms. Departing from normative accounts of cognition as an "ideal observer" or "truth-seeker," we posit that cognitive architectures are optimized for risk minimization and uncertainty management rather than veridical representation. We introduce "Architectural Irreducibility" as a fundamental safeguard against the formation of chronically maladaptive global models. Metacognition is framed not as an auxiliary high-level faculty, but as a structural necessity emerging from hierarchical complexity and the partial autonomy of regulatory loops. The framework delineates specific architectural layers — from reflexive processing to metacognitive monitoring — and their functional roles in preventing what we term "false global confidence."
Files
frameworkMorozovaOK.pdf
Files
(68.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:9897c08fbf0906f760970eed65968cbb
|
68.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181-204.
- Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127-138.
- Friston, K., & Stephan, K. E. (2007). Free-energy and the brain. Synthese, 159(3), 417-458.
- Hoffman, D. D. (2019). The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Hohwy, J. (2013). The Predictive Mind. Oxford University Press.
- Shea, N. (2018). Representation in Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press.