Published January 30, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Routing Optimization and Challenges in Wireless Sensor Networks under IoT Framework

Authors/Creators

  • 1. ROR icon Islamic Azad University, West Tehran Branch
  • 2. ROR icon Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology

Description

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) constitute a key enabling technology for the Internet of Things (IoT), providing large-scale, low-power sensing and monitoring capabilities in smart cities, industrial automation, environmental surveillance, healthcare, and agriculture. However, the integration of WSNs into the IoT framework exacerbates classical routing challenges such as energy scarcity, dynamic topology, data redundancy, link unreliability, and Quality of Service (QoS) constraints. At the same time, recent advances in optimization and artificial intelligence have introduced new opportunities for adaptive, context-aware, and cross-layer routing solutions. This paper presents a comprehensive review of routing optimization and challenges in WSNs under the IoT framework. First, we discuss the fundamental characteristics of WSNs in IoT scenarios and the design requirements of routing protocols. Then, we classify routing challenges into energy efficiency, scalability, reliability, latency, heterogeneity, mobility, and security-privacy issues. We examine state-of-the-art routing protocols and optimization approaches including ant colony optimization (ACO), particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithms (GA), fuzzy logic, mathematical programming, reinforcement learning (RL), and deep learning-based schemes. Special emphasis is placed on context-aware routing, software-defined networking (SDN)-enabled IoT, edge/fog-assisted routing, and blockchain-based secure routing. We also summarize and compare representative protocols and recent solutions published from 2020 to 2025 in terms of their design goals, performance metrics, and application domains. Finally, we identify open research problems and future directions towards self-optimizing, sustainable, and trustworthy routing mechanisms for next-generation IoT-driven WSNs.

Files

FilePdf202602041224777202511151224777-3.pdf

Files (379.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:11d456187337a8704bd91c267e499e2c
379.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Submitted
2025-07-07
Accepted
2026-01-17

References

  • A. M. Khedr et al., "Advancing IoT-driven wireless sensor networks with context-aware routing: A comprehensive review," Computer Science Review, vol. 58, Art. no. 100803, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100803.
  • P. Chugh et al., "Advanced energy-efficient PEGASIS-based routing protocol for Internet of Things applications," Microprocessors and Microsystems, vol. 103, Art. no. 104727, 2023.
  • H. Han, J. Tang, and Z. Jing, "Wireless sensor network routing optimization based on improved ant colony algorithm in the Internet of Things," Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. e23577, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23577.
  • M. E. Haque and U. Baroudi, "Dynamic energy-efficient routing protocol in wireless sensor networks," Wireless Networks, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 3715–3733, Jul. 2020.
  • G. Farahani, "Improving network energy consumption using novel proposed geographic routing with mobile sink in wireless sensor networks," Journal of Industrial Engineering International, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 23, 2024, doi: 10.82374/jiei.2025.1197138.
  • G. Farahani and A. Farahani, "Optimization of mobile base station placement to reduce energy consumption in multi-hop wireless sensor networks," Journal of Industrial Engineering International, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ICAC55051.2022.9911088.
  • R. E. Mohamed et al., "Energy-efficient collaborative proactive routing protocol for wireless sensor networks," Computer Networks, vol. 142, pp. 154–167, 2018.
  • S. Sankar et al., "CT-RPL: Cluster-tree-based routing protocol to maximize the lifetime of the Internet of Things," Sensors, vol. 20, no. 20, 2020.
  • G. Farahani et al., "Identification of grape leaf diseases using proposed enhanced VGG16," in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC), Sep. 2022, pp. 1–6, IEEE, doi: 10.1109/ICAC55051.2022.9911074.
  • P. Biswas et al., "A multipath routing protocol for secure and energy-efficient communication in wireless sensor networks," Computer Networks, vol. 232, Art. no. 109842, 2023.
  • D. B. D. and F. Al-Turjman, "A hybrid secure routing and monitoring mechanism in Internet of Things-based wireless sensor networks," Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 97, Art. no. 102022, 2020.
  • R. Maivizhi and P. Yogesh, "Q-learning-based routing for in-network aggregation in wireless sensor networks," Wireless Networks, vol. 27, pp. 1–20, 2021.
  • A. Farahani and M. L. Moghadam, "Workers scheduling in production logistics in a job shop production system," Journal of Industrial Engineering International, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 18, 2025, doi: 10.82374/jiei.2025.1205831.
  • A. Farahani et al., "Flexible personnel scheduling in large multi-product unpaced asynchronous assembly lines," in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC), Sep. 2022, pp. 1–6, IEEE, doi: 10.82374/jiei.2024.1039666.
  • A. Farahani et al., "Partial flexible job shop scheduling considering preventive maintenance and priorities," Working Papers on Operations Management, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 27–48, 2020, doi: 10.4995/wpom.v11i2.14187.
  • A. Feng et al., "In-network aggregation for data center networks: A survey," Computer Communications, vol. 198, pp. 63–76, 2023.
  • X. Li et al., "A distributed routing algorithm for data collection in low-duty-cycle wireless sensor networks," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1420–1433, 2017.
  • V. Kanakaris, D. Ndzi, and G. A. Papakostas, "Sensitivity analysis of the Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector routing protocol regarding forwarding probability," Optik, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 1016–1021, 2016.
  • T. O. Kebeng, S. M. Sheikh, and M. Kgwadi, "Reducing routing overhead with a clustering protocol based on Ad Hoc Distance Vector and Dynamic Source Routing protocols," in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICABCD), 2022.
  • S. Roy et al., "Secure data aggregation in wireless sensor networks: Filtering out the attacker's impact," IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 681–694, 2014.
  • A. Poornima and B. Amberker, "SEEDA: Secure end-to-end data aggregation in wireless sensor networks," in Proceedings of the World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing (WOCN), 2010.
  • M. Venkatanaresh et al., "Effective proactive routing protocol using smart nodes system," Measurement: Sensors, vol. 24, Art. no. 100456, 2022.
  • S. Pourroostaei Ardakani, J. Padget, and M. De Vos, "A mobile agent routing protocol for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks," International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, vol. 24, pp. 27–41, 2017.
  • S. Saginbekov and A. Jhumka, "Many-to-many data aggregation scheduling in wireless sensor networks with two sinks," Computer Networks, vol. 123, pp. 184–199, 2017.
  • M. Umar, N. Alrajeh, and A. Mehmood, "SALMA: An efficient state-based hybrid routing protocol for mobile nodes in wireless sensor networks," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2016.