Published February 6, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

CINEMA AND THE LAW IN INDIA: A STATUTORY AND JUDICIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CINEMATOGRAPH ACT, 1952

Authors/Creators

  • 1. National Forensic Sciences University

Description

Cinema in India occupies a unique legal position as a powerful medium of artistic expression, mass communication, and commercial enterprise. Owing to its composite nature — integrating literary, musical, dramatic, and visual elements — cinematographic works raise complex legal questions relating to intellectual property rights, contractual relationships, regulatory control, and constitutional freedoms. This research paper undertakes a doctrinal analysis of the legal framework governing the Indian film industry, with particular emphasis on the Cinematograph Act, 1952 as the principal statute regulating film certification and public exhibition. The paper examines the evolution and structural functioning of the Indian film industry and analyses the allocation and protection of intellectual property rights under the Copyright Act, 1957, including producer ownership, authors' and performers' rights, and the significance of moral rights. It further evaluates the objectives, scope, and constitutional validity of the Cinematograph Act, 1952, focusing on the certification regime and the role of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). Through an analysis of key judicial decisions such as K.A. Abbas v. Union of India, S. Rangarajan v. P. Jagjivan Ram, and Prakash Jha Productions v. Union of India, the study highlights the judiciary's role in balancing freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a) with reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) of the Constitution. The paper also explores the contractual and commercial dimensions of the film industry, including artist agreements, assignment and licensing of rights, revenue-sharing mechanisms, and dispute resolution practices. It identifies contemporary challenges arising from digital platforms, film piracy, artificial intelligence, contractual imbalances, and regulatory fragmentation. The study concludes by suggesting the need for stronger enforcement mechanisms, greater regulatory consistency, contractual standardisati...

Files

6985ab25e9536.pdf

Files (360.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b35b6f2a51faf2be4681ed5dd10fe0d8
360.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details