Philodryas pseudomamba Pietro, Sánchez, Poljak & Alcalde, 2026, sp. nov.
Authors/Creators
- 1. Sección Herpetología, División Zoología Vertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Avenida 122 y 60 s / No, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata, Calle 8 No 1467, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 2. Laboratorio de Ecología Molecular, Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC-CONICET), Calle Bernardo A. Houssay No 200, 9410, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina
- 3. Laboratorio de Ecología Molecular, Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC-CONICET), Calle Bernardo A. Houssay No 200, 9410, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina & Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego, Fuegia Basket No 251, 9410, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina
- 4. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata, Calle 8 No 1467, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina & Sección Herpetología, Instituto de Limnología Dr. R. A. Ringuelet (CONICET-UNLP), Boulevard 120 y 62 s / No, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Description
Philodryas pseudomamba sp. nov.
Figures 3 C, 3 F, 3 I, 4 C, 5 C, 6 C, 7 E, 7 F, 9 B, 9 D, 9 F, 9 H, 11 C, 12
Dryophilax schottii (not Schlegel, 1837) – Duméril (1853: 112), Duméril et al. (1854: 1118)
Philodryas schottii (not Schlegel, 1837) – Günther (1858: 125), Jan (1863 b: 83), Hensel (1868: 332), Boettger (1885: 235), Boulenger (1886: 434), Cope (1895: 218), Peracca (1895: 18), Boulenger (1896: 130, in part), Koslowsky (1898: 196, in part), Devincenzi (1925: 46, in part), Ábalos et al. (1964: 264)
Pseudophis schottii – Cope (1862: 348)
Chlorosoma schottii – Amaral (1929: 214, in part), Amaral (1932: 101), Serié (1936: 51, in part)
Philodryas patagoniensis – Hoge (1964: 67, in part), Peters and Orejas-Miranda (1970: 244, in part), Thomas (1976: 172, in part), Williams and Francini (1991: 75, in part), Cei (1993: 639, in part), Lobo and Scrocchi (1994: 105), Fowler and Salomão (1995: 150), Leynaud and Bucher (1999: 30), Zaher (1999: 67), Achaval (2001: 7, in part), Giraudo (2001: 155), Carreira (2002: 36, in part), Giraudo and Scrocchi (2002: 32, in part), Carreira et al. (2005: 372, in part), Hartmann and Marques (2005: 25), López and Giraudo (2008: 474), Zaher et al. (2009: 121), Vidal et al. (2010: 53), Pyron et al. (2011: 337), Grazziotin et al. (2012: 443), Wallach et al. (2014: 551, in part), Cabral and Bueno-Villafañe (2015: 13), Cacciali et al. (2016 b: 240), Gouveia et al. (2017: 6), Harrington et al. (2018: 71, in part), Nogueira et al. (2019: 221, in part), Quintela and Loebmann (2019: 12), Zaher et al. (2019: 28), Arredondo et al. (2020: 6), Williams et al. (2021: 73, in part), Tioyama et al. (2023: 14), Chuliver and Scanferla (2024: 10, in part)
Pseudablabes patagoniensis – Melo-Sampaio et al. (2021: 37), Dubeux et al. (2022: 6)
Suggested common name.
South American dotted racer.
Holotype.
MLP.R 5449, an adult male from Colonia Carlos Pellegrini, San Martin department (28.5333°S, 57.1712°W; elevation 67 m), Corrientes Province, Argentina; collected by Cátedra de Herpetología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata between 11 and 15 November 2008.
Paratypes (n = 14).
Argentina. Chaco Province: MLP.JW 1949 (adult female) from Juan José Castelli, General Güemes department, collected by I. Berkunsky in January 2001; MACN 38710 (adult female) from Resistencia, San Fernando department, collected by C. Schlinger on 19 November 1956. Corrientes Province: MACN 50189 (adult female) from Provincial Road 5 between San Luis del Palmar and Laguna Brava, San Cosme department, collected by B. Cajade and E. Nenda on 30 July 2017; MACN 48195 (adult male) from Yapeyú, San Martín department, collected by Ayudantía Marítima Yapeyú on 6 September 1965. Entre Ríos Province: MACN 48165 (adult female) from the surroundings of La Paz, La Paz department, collected by M. Baldi on 7 November 1975; MACN 48163 (adult female) from Pronunciamiento, Uruguay department, collected on 30 October 1967. Formosa Province: MACN 48134 (adult male) from Bartolomé de Las Casas, Patiño department. Misiones Province: MACN 48166 (adult female) from Posadas, Capital department, collected on 24 April 1966. Santa Fe Province: MLP. R 6445 (adult male) from 4 km NE of Aguará Grande, San Cristóbal department, collected by L. Alcalde, M. J. Cassano and M. B. Semeñiuk on 29 October 2016; MLP. R 6434 (adult male) from Provincial Road 3 in Los Tábanos, Vera department, collected by L. Alcalde, M. J. Cassano and M. B. Semeñiuk on 21 October 2016; MLP. R 6450 (adult female) from Provincial Road 3 near Vera, Vera department, collected by L. Alcalde, M. J. Cassano and M. B. Semeñiuk on 25 October 2016; MLP. R 6455 (adult male) from road cross between Provincial Road 3 and National Road 11 near Vera, Vera department, collected by L. Alcalde, M. J. Cassano and M. B. Semeñiuk on 25 October 2016. Santiago del Estero Province: MACN 4325 (adult male) form Malbrán, Aguirre department, collected by Cazale and Peyrade. — Brazil: São Pablo State: MACN 36703 (adult female) from the surroundings of Ibiúna, Ibiúna municipality, collected by Instituto Butantán in April 1996.
Referred specimens.
For the species description, 178 museum specimens corresponding to the A-morphotype were examined (File S 1), including those from the type series. In addition, numerous photographs from citizen science platforms were analysed to enhance the distribution dataset, bringing the total number of A-morphotype specimens considered to 403 (File S 1).
Etymology.
The prefix pseudo of the epithet derives from Greek, meaning “ falseness ” or “ falsehood ”. Mamba refers to the term “ imamba ” used in the Bantú language (spoken by various African ethnic groups) to designate snakes of the genus Dendroaspis, commonly known in English and other languages as “ mambas ”. The species name was explicitly inspired by D. polylepis (the black mamba), due to the general physical resemblance and notably aggressive behaviour shared by both species.
Diagnosis.
Philodryas pseudomamba sp. nov. differs from all other species of the genus by the following combination of characters: (1) dorsal scale rows 19–19 – 15, (2) HL / TTL between 2 and 3.4 %, (3) SVL / TTL between 68 and 77.7 %, (4) TL / TTL between 22.2 and 32 %, (5) ventral scales between 166 and 199, (6) subcaudal scales between 81 and 124, (7) loreal scale rectangular, longer than tall, (8) dorsal half of the preocular markedly exceeding the posterior margin of the loreal, (9) supralabials 7 (3, 4), (10) lateral border of the supraocular straight in dorsal view, (11) first temporal scale large (height being less than 40 % of the length), (12) dorsal scales of the head with completely immaculate olive colouration featuring tiny black scale margins, (13) dorsal body design dotted, not maculated, and (14) ventral scales lacking lateral black spots.
Description of the holotype.
See Figs 3 C, 3 F, 3 I, 4 C, 5 C, 6 C, 12. Adult male, TTL of 910 mm, HL of 27.3 mm, SVL of 645 mm, and TL of 265 mm; proportions, HL / TTL = 3 %, SVL / TTL = 70.8 %, and TL / TTL = 29.2 %.
Morphological features include: loreals 1 / 1 (square-shaped with a dominant cranial-caudal axis, longer than tall), preoculars 1 / 1 (with the dorsal half markedly exceeding the half of the loreal), postoculars 2 / 2, temporals 1 + 2 / 1 + 2 (the first temporal is long, with the height representing 35 % of the scale length), supralabials 7 (3, 4) / 7 (3, 4) with the 5 th and 6 th being larger than the others (Fig. 3 C), infralabials 9 (5) / 9 (5) (Figs 3 C, 3 I), and external border of the supraocular straight or slightly expanded laterally in dorsal view (Fig. 3 F). Dorsal scales 19–19 – 15, smooth, with single apical pits (Figs 4 C, 5 C). There are 176 ventral scales and 104 subcaudal scales, anal and subcaudals are divided.
In preservative, the dorsal surfaces of the head and neck are olive brown, closely matching the colouration of the dorsal body (Fig. 12). The ventral surface of the head is beige-white, with the dorsal-ventral colour transition occurring at the midpoint of the supralabials (Fig. 3 C). The dorsal head scales lack dark markings and exhibit fine black interscale sutures (Fig. 3 F). Paravertebral lines evident, the dorsal scales display dark spots at their anterior and posterior ends, which converge between adjacent scales to form a single dot (Figs 4 C, 5 C, 12). Many dorsal scales have lost their outermost layer, resulting in a lighter, pale lavender appearance (Fig. 12). Ventral scales are beige-white, each separated by a continuous black interscale line (Fig. 6 C), which becomes blurred along the subcaudal region (Fig. 12).
The hemipenes of the holotype of P. pseudomamba sp. nov. are long and bilobed, with the lobes comprising approximately one-third of the total hemipenial length. The maximum width occurs at the level of the lobes and corresponds to 3.1 times the hemipenial length. The branches of the spermatic groove bifurcate near the base of the hemipenis and run in close parallel before diverging at approximately the midpoint of the organ. The sulcate and asulcate faces bear longitudinal rows of enlarged spines that increase in height distally. On the asulcate face, the spine configuration is 5 / 6, and on the sulcate face, 6 / 6 (Fig. 7 E, F). The counts of the sulcate face begin at the bifurcation point of the spermatic groove toward the distal end (i. e., spines posterior to this point were considered spinules). Two longitudinal rows of large calyces are on the asulcate surface, covering the middle and distal portions of the body and lobes. These calyces are associated with a profuse reticulation of the lobes and randomly distributed patches of spinules. Overall, the hemipenial morphology of the holotype resembles that described by Zaher (1999), Melo-Sampaio et al. (2021: fig. 2 C), and Scrocchi et al. (2024) for specimens whose geographic distribution corresponds to P. pseudomamba sp. nov.
Variation.
In adult males, TTL ranges from 618 to 1207 mm (mean: 954.3 ± 138.8 mm), HL from 21.1 to 33.1 mm (mean: 28 ± 3.1 mm), SVL from 435 to 871 mm (mean: 678.5 ± 104.5 mm), and TL from 183 to 343 mm (mean: 275.7 ± 43.3 mm); in adult females, TTL ranges from 672 to 1552 mm (mean: 1135 ± 191.9 mm), HL from 22.9 to 39.4 mm (mean: 32 ± 4.3 mm), SVL from 497 to 1170 mm (mean: 849.7 ± 142.9 mm), and TL from 175 to 382 mm (mean: 285.2 ± 52.1 mm). Tables 2 and 3 summarise variations in pholidosis and measurements.
The colouration in life (Fig. 11 C) is less variable than that observed in P. patagoniensis. A consistent difference in colouration exists between the head and neck compared to the rest of the body. Depending on the individual, the dorsum and laterals of the head and neck range from ochre to orange. The body dorsum is typically olive but may also appear as mint green or olive green. Each dorsal scale bears a subtle dark spot at its anterior and posterior ends, with the anterior spot being less pronounced than in P. patagoniensis. These spots on adjacent scales converge to form a single dot, rather than a maculation as seen in P. patagoniensis, except in juveniles. The aggregation of these dots along the same dorsal scale row forms oblique lines oriented ventro-dorsally and cranially-caudally. In both dorsal and lateral views, these oblique lines give the dorsal scales a pectinated appearance on either side of the mid-vertebral line. Continuous paravertebral lines formed between subsequent scales are more frequently observed than in P. patagoniensis.
The ventral colouration of the head and body is pale yellow. The boundary between the dorsal ochre and the ventral pale-yellow lies below the midpoint of the supralabials. The black pigmentation along the sutures of the head scales is more delicate than in P. patagoniensis, particularly in the parietals, frontal, and supraoculars, which also lack the irregular dark markings characteristic of P. patagoniensis. The pale yellow ventral colouration is occasionally interrupted by black lines between successive ventral scales. Each of these lines is typically continuous, although they may less frequently be interrupted at the mid-ventral region. In the subcaudal region, this pattern becomes progressively blurred. The tongue is bicoloured, displaying a red base and a black fork.
In preservative, the colouration resembles that observed in life, except in poorly preserved specimens. Adequately fixed and well-preserved specimens appear pale compared to live specimens. For example, the ventral scales often fade from pale yellow to beige or white, and the contrast between the head and dorsal body colouration becomes less distinct. Although melanistic specimens are frequently found in collections (e. g., MACN 10228 or MACN 39619), we did not encounter melanism during our fieldwork. Typical head and body patterns are entirely or partially obscured in these melanistic specimens. Furthermore, black rings surrounding dorsal scales are present in some specimens and appear more frequently than in P. patagoniensis (e. g., MACN 7841, MACN 48179).
The other specimen examined for hemipenial morphology differed from the holotype in a single aspect: it exhibited a 5 / 5 configuration of the elongated spines on the sulcate and asulcate faces.
Comparison.
The dorsal scale rows distinguish Philodryas pseudomamba sp. nov. (19–19 – 15) from P. agassizii (13–13 – 13), P. varia (17–17 – 13 to 19–17 – 13; Thomas 1976), P. livida (17–17 – 15), P. boliviana (15–17 – 13 to 17–17 – 13; Thomas 1976), P. baroni (ranging from 21–21 – 17 to 23–23 – 17; Thomas 1976), P. nattereri (from 21–21 – 15 to 21–22 – 17; Thomas 1976), and P. trilineata (21–23 – 17 to 26–23 – 17; Thomas 1976). The absence of a dorsal colour that shifts from green in the anterior half of the body to brown in the posterior part distinguishes P. pseudomamba sp. nov. from P. erlandi and P. mattogrossensis, which exhibit a dorsal colour shift between the mid and posterior body. The lack of well-defined broad stripes on the body distinguishes P. pseudomamba sp. nov. from P. chamissonis and P. psammophidea, both of which possess stripes. Both P. aestiva and P. olfersii display a uniform green colouration on the dorsum and flanges of the body and tail, which is absent in P. pseudomamba sp. nov. Additionally, P. aestiva differs in having keeled dorsal scales (smooth dorsal scales in P. pseudomamba sp. nov.), while P. olfersii typically features a black ocular stripe, which is always absent in P. pseudomamba sp. nov. The rare P. cordata can be distinguished from P. pseudomamba sp. nov. by its entirely black tongue (bicoloured in P. pseudomamba sp. nov., with a red base and black fork), and its hemipenial features, which are markedly divergent from those described in all Philodryas species. Certain body proportions are useful to distinguish between P. pseudomamba sp. nov. and P. arnaldoi (Amaral 1932). In P. pseudomamba sp. nov., the tail is shorter (mean TL / TTL <27 % for both sexes) than in P. arnaldoi (> 46 %).
Lastly, P. pseudomamba sp. nov. differs from P. patagoniensis by (character states of the former in parenthesis): (1) head and body shorter (larger), (2) short tail (large), (3) subcaudal scales 57–109 and ventral scales 159–193 (high number in both cases: 81–124 subcaudal scales and 166–199 ventral scales), (4) loreal scale markedly quadrate with no dominant axis, and the dorsal half of the preocular barely exceeds the posterior margin of the loreal (loreal scale is rectangular, longer than tall, with the dorsal half of the preocular markedly exceeding the posterior margin of the loreal), (5) external border of the supraocular concave in dorsal view (straight in dorsal view), (6) first temporal scale shorter, with the height representing more than 45 % of the length (longer than it is tall, with the height being less than 40 % of the length), (7) parietal, frontal, and supraocular scales brown, irregularly spotted with black, and bordered with wide black margins (completely immaculate olive colouration featuring tiny black scale margins), (8) dorsal scales exhibit a maculated pattern (not maculated), (9) lateral black spots present in the ventral scales (absent), (10) vomerine processes of the premaxilla sub-parallel (slightly divergent), (11) dorsal lamina of the nasal robust with non-concave posterolateral flange (dorsal lamina of the nasal slender with concave posterolateral flange), (12) three pointed and double-notched anterior ends of the parabasisphenoid (two pointed and single median-notched), and (13) rounded maxillary process of the palatine (triangular).
Distribution.
See Fig. 1. Philodryas pseudomamba sp. nov. is distributed across five countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. In Argentina, the species occurs in 12 provinces: Buenos Aires, Chaco, Córdoba, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, Formosa, Misiones, San Luis, Santa Fe, Santiago del Estero, Tucumán, and Jujuy. It inhabits nine ecoregions (Delta and Islands of the Paraná and Uruguay Rivers, Dry Chaco, Espinal, Fields and Weeds, Humid Chaco, Ibera’s Marshlands, Pampa, Paranaense Forest, and Yungas Forest), and 33 regional complexes (sensu Morello et al. 2012).
In Uruguay, P. pseudomamba has been recorded in seven departments: Artigas, Cerro Largo, Paysandú, Río Negro, Rivera, Salto, and Tacuarembó. It occurs in four ecozones: Western Sedimentary Basin, Basaltic Slope, Gondwanic Sedimentary Basin, and Eastern Hills (Brazeiro et al. 2012). In Paraguay, this species occurs in six departments: Alto Paraná, Central, Misiones, Ñeembucú, Paraguari, and Presidente Hayes. It inhabits two ecoregions: Alto Paraná and the Atlantic Forest, and the Humid Chaco (Ávila Torres et al. 2018). In Bolivia, the species has been recorded in the Santa Cruz department, and the Gran Chaco and Chiquitano Dry Forest ecoregions (Ibisch et al. 2003). In Brazil, P. pseudomamba sp. nov. occurs in 14 states: Bahia, Distrito Federal, Goiás, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Norte, Rio Grande do Sul, São Paulo, Santa Catarina, Sergipe, and Espírito Santo. Its distribution spans five major Brazilian biomes: Atlantic Forest, Caatinga, Cerrado, Pampa, and Pantanal (IBGE 2019).
Notes
Files
Files
(18.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:70a3445ceb1e8438b75c43da140782fc
|
18.7 kB | Download |
System files
(100.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:4d4d67aab76c470589be0fb3e3373e8c
|
100.4 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Collection code
- MLP
- Material sample ID
- MLP.R 5449
- Event date
- 2008-11-11
- Verbatim event date
- 2008-11-11/15
- Scientific name authorship
- Di Pietro & Sánchez & Poljak & Alcalde
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Phylum
- Chordata
- Family
- Colubridae
- Genus
- Philodryas
- Species
- pseudomamba
- Taxon rank
- species
- Taxonomic status
- sp. nov.
- Type status
- holotype
- Taxonomic concept label
- Philodryas pseudomamba Pietro, Sánchez, Poljak & Alcalde, 2026
References
- Duméril AMC (1853) Prodrome de la classification des reptiles ophidiens: mémoire lu dans la séance du 2 novembre 1852. Didot Frères, Paris, 140 pp., 2 plates. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.60463
- Duméril AMC, Bibron G, Duméril AHA (1854) Erpétologie Générale, ou, Histoire Naturelle Complète des Reptiles. Tome septième, deuxième partie. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, xii, 756 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.45973
- Günther ACLG (1858) Catalogue of Colubrine Snakes in the Collection of the British Museum. British Museum, London, xvi, 281 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.13272
- Jan G (1863 b) Elenco sistematico degli ofidi descritti e disegnati per l'iconografia generale. Tip. di A. Lombardi, Milano, 143 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.106683
- Hensel R (1868) Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Wirbelthiere Südbrasiliens. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 34: 323–375.
- Boettger O (1885) Liste von Reptilien and Batrachiern aus Paraguay. Zeitschrift fu ̈ r Naturwissenschaften 58: 213–248.
- Boulenger GA (1886) A synopsis of the reptiles and batrachians of the Province Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5, 18: 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938609459995
- Cope ED (1895) The classification of the Ophidia. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 18: 186–219.
- Peracca MG (1895) Viaggio del dott. Alfredo Borelli nella Repubblica Argentina e nel Paraguay. Bollettino dei Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia comparata della R. Università di Torino 10: 1–32.
- Koslowsky J (1898) Enumeración sistemática y distribución geográfica de los reptiles argentinos. Revista del Museo de La Plata 8: 161–200, 7 plates.
- Devincenzi GJ (1925) Fauna Erpetológica del Uruguay. Anales del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo, Serie 2, 2: 1–65.
- Ábalos JW, Baez EC, Nader R (1964) Serpientes de Santiago del Estero (República Argentina). Acta Zoologica Lilloana 20: 211–283.
- Cope ED (1862) Catalogues of the reptiles obtained during the Explorations of the Parana, Paraguay, Vermejo and Uruguay Rivers, by Capt. Thos. J. Page, U. S. N.; and of those procured by Lieut. N. Michler, U. S. Top. Eng., Commander of the Expedition conducting the survey of the Atrato River. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 14: 346–359.
- Amaral A do (1929) Estudos sobre ophidios neotropicos XVIII. Lista remissiva dos ophidios da região neotropica. Memórias do Instituto Butantan 4: 127–271.
- Amaral A do (1932) Contribuição ao conhecimento dos ofídios do Brasil. VI. Uma nova espécie de colubrídeo opisthoglypho do gênero Chlorosoma Wagler, 1830. Memórias do Instituto Butantan 7: 99–101.
- Serié P (1936) Nueva enumeración sistemática y distribución geográfica de los ofidios argentinos. Revista del Museo de La Plata, Obra Cincuentenario 2: 33–61.
- Lobo F, Scrocchi G (1994) Osteología craneal del género Philodryas (Serpentes: Colubridae). Cuadernos de Herpetología 8: 104–111.
- Fowler IR, Salomão MG (1995) A new technique to distinguish between immature and adult snakes and between males and females in six species of the Neotropical colubrid snakes Philodryas. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 30: 149–157.
- Leynaud GC, Bucher EH (1999) La fauna de serpientes del Chaco sudamericano: Diversidad, distribución geográfica y estado de conservación. Academia Nacional de Ciencias Miscelánea 98: 1–46.
- Zaher H (1999) Hemipenial morphology of the South American xenodontine snakes: With a proposal for a monophyletic Xenodontinae and a reappraisal of colubroid hemipenes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 240: 1–168.
- Achaval F (2001) Actualización sistemática y mapas de distribución de los reptiles del Uruguay. Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service 129: 1–37.
- Giraudo AR (2001) Serpientes de la Selva Paranaense y del Chaco Húmedo. LOLA, Buenos Aires, 328 pp.
- Hartmann PA, Marques OAV (2005) Diet and habitat use of two sympatric species of Philodryas (Colubridae), in south Brazil. Amphibia - Reptilia 26: 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568538053693251
- López MS, Giraudo AR (2008) Ecology of the snake Philodryas patagoniensis (Serpentes, Colubridae) from Northeast Argentina. Journal of Herpetology 42: 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1670/07-087.1
- Zaher H, Grazziotin FG, Cadle JE, Murphy RW, de Moura-Leite JC, Bonatto SL (2009) Molecular phylogeny of advanced snakes (Serpentes, Caenophidia) with an emphasis on South American Xenodontines: A revised classification and descriptions of new taxa. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 49: 115–153. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0031-10492009001100001
- Vidal N, Dewynter M, Gower DJ (2010) Dissecting the major American snake radiation: A molecular phylogeny of the Dipsadidae Bonaparte (Serpentes, Caenophidia). Comptes Rendus Biologies 333: 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2009.11.003
- Pyron RA, Burbrink FT, Colli GR, Montes de Oca AN, Vitt LJ, Kuczynski CA, Wiens JJ (2011) The phylogeny of advanced snakes (Colubroidea), with discovery of a new subfamily and comparison of support methods for likelihood trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58: 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.11.006
- Grazziotin FG, Zaher H, Murphy RW, Scrocchi G, Benavides MA, Zhang YP, Bonatto SL (2012) Molecular phylogeny of the New World Dipsadidae (Serpentes: Colubroidea): A reappraisal. Cladistics 28: 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00393.x
- Cabral H, Bueno-Villafañe D (2015) The genus Philodryas (Wagler, 1830) (Serpentes: Dipsadidae) in Paraguay: Distribution and ecological affinities. Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural del Paraguay 19: 5–18.
- Cacciali P, Scott NJ, Aquino-Ortiz AL, Fitzgerald LA, Smith P (2016 b) The reptiles of Paraguay: Literature, distribution, and an annotated taxonomic checklist. Special Publication of the Museum of Southwestern Biology 11: 1–373.
- Gouveia RV, Novelli IA, Vieira FM, Sousa BM (2017) Morphological variation of Philodryas patagoniensis (Girard, 1858) (Serpentes, Dipsadidae) from Brazil, based on the study of pholidosis, colouration and morphometric features. Biota Neotropica 17: e 20160237. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2016-0237
- Quintela FM, Loebmann D (2019) Diet, sexual dimorphism and reproduction of sympatric racers Philodryas aestiva and Philodryas patagoniensis from the coastal Brazilian Pampa. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 91: e 20180296. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201920180296
- Zaher H, Murphy RW, Arredondo JC, Graboski R, Machado-Filho PR, Mahlow K, Montingelli GG, Quadros AB, Orlov NL, Wilkinson M, Zhang YP, Grazziotin FG (2019) Large-scale molecular phylogeny, morphology, divergence-time estimation and the fossil record of advanced caenophidian snakes (Squamata: Serpentes). PLoS ONE 14: e 0216148. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216148
- Arredondo JC, Grazziotin FG, Scrocchi GJ, Trefaut Rodrigues M, Bonatto SL, Zaher H (2020) Molecular phylogeny of the tribe Philodryadini Cope, 1886 (Dipsadidae: Xenodontinae): Rediscovering the diversity of the South American Racers. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 60: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2020.60.53
- Tioyama EC, Bayona-Serrano JD, Portes Junior JA, Nachtigall PG, de Souza VC, Beraldo-Neto E, Grazziotin FG, Junqueira-de-Azevedo ILM, Moura-da-Silva AM, Freitas-de-Sousa LA (2023) The venom composition of the snake tribe Philodryadini: ' Omic' techniques reveal intergeneric variability among South American racers. Toxins 15: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15070415
- Melo-Sampaio PR, Passos P, Martins AR, Jennings WB, Moura-Leite JC, Morato SAA, Venegas PJ, Chávez G, Venâncio NM, Souza MB (2021) A phantom on the trees: Integrative taxonomy supports a reappraisal of rear-fanged snakes classification (Dipsadidae: Philodryadini). Zoologischer Anzeiger 290: 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2020.10.008
- Dubeux MJM, Araújo-Neto JV, Triburcio ICS, Lisboa BS, Torquato S, Freitas MA, Freire EMX, Guarnieri MC, Mott T (2022) A " hotspot " within a hotspot: The reptiles of the Estação Ecológica and Área de Proteção Ambiental de Murici, Atlantic Forest of northeastern Brazil. Biota Neotropica 22: e 20221337. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2022-1337
- Scrocchi GJ, Cabrera MP, Stazzonelli JC, Kretzschmar S (2024) Serpientes del Noroeste Argentino. Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, 252 pp.
- Thomas RA (1976) A Revision of the South American Colubrid Snake Genus Philodryas Wagler, 1830. PhD Thesis, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, 378 pp.
- Morello JH, Matteucci SD, Rodríguez AF, Silva ME (2012) Ecorregiones y complejos ecosistémicos argentinos. Orientación Gráfica Editora, Buenos Aires, 752 pp.
- Brazeiro A, Panario D, Soutullo A, Gutierrez O, Segura A, Mai P (2012) Clasificación y delimitación de las eco-regiones de Uruguay. Informe Técnico. Convenio MGAP / PPR – Facultad de Ciencias / Vida Silvestre / Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay / CIEDUR, Montevideo, 40 pp. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1328.0328
- Ávila Torres I, D'Elía G, Vogt C, Garcete-Barrett BR (2018) Análisis crítico de la biogeografía del Paraguay. Reportes Científicos de la FACEN 9: 42–50. https://doi.org/10.18004/rcfacen.2018.9.1.42
- Ibisch PL, Beck SG, Gerkmann B, Carretero A (2003) Ecorregiones y ecosistemas. In: Ibisch PL, Mérida G (Eds) Biodiversidad: la riqueza de Bolivia, estado de conocimiento y conservación. Editorial FAN, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, 47–88.