Published February 7, 2026 | Version v1
Working paper Open

The Case for Independent AI Assurance in Education: From Self-Attestation to External Validation

  • 1. Purdy House Publishing and Consulting

Description

Self-attestation serves an essential function for internal improvement. Organizations cannot improve what they do not examine, and self-assessment frameworks provide the necessary structure for that examination. Yet external stakeholders require higher evidentiary weight than self-reports provide. When a board asks whether governance controls are in place, when an insurer evaluates risk, when a regulator investigates compliance, the answer "we assessed ourselves and found ourselves adequate" carries limited persuasive force. This memorandum argues that AI governance in education has reached an inflection point analogous to the pre-SOC era in information security. It introduces the Evidence Ladder framework, identifies trigger conditions that move organizations beyond self-attestation, examines operational requirements for independent assurance, and maps three interim paths emerging during the pre-certification period. The analysis draws on insurance underwriting developments, higher education accreditation models, and international standards formalization signals including the UK DSIT assurance roadmap and ISO/IEC 42006:2025.

Files

PHI_Memorandum_5_v1_0_Jan2026.pdf

Files (241.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d2e6911e567d554a6a5d7c6e86480296
241.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Continues
Working paper: 10.5281/zenodo.18007387 (DOI)
Working paper: 10.5281/zenodo.18085507 (DOI)
Working paper: 10.5281/zenodo.18085646 (DOI)
Working paper: 10.5281/zenodo.18237730 (DOI)