ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF REMOTE WORK TECHNOLOGIES ON TEAM COORDINATION, PERFORMANCE METRICS, AND EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCE IN REAL ESTATE, NAVI MUMBAI
Authors/Creators
- 1. RESEARCH SCHOLAR, PACIFIC ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH UNIVERSITY, UDAIPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA.
- 2. M.B.A., M.PHIL, PH.D., ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT, PACIFIC ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH UNIVERSITY, UDAIPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA.
- 3. RESEARCH CO-SUPERVISOR, DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT, PACIFIC ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH UNIVERSITY, UDAIPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA.
Description
This research undertakes a comparative investigation into the levels of productivity, performance, and job satisfaction among employees engaged in onsite versus remote work within the real estate sector of Navi Mumbai. In response to evolving workplace practices influenced by technological advancements and changing workforce expectations, this study critically examines the operational implications of both work settings. Employing a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, the study integrates quantitative data from structured surveys with qualitative insights derived from semi-structured interviews. The results indicate that onsite work environments tend to facilitate stronger interpersonal collaboration and expedited managerial processes, whereas remote work arrangements contribute positively to individual output and employee morale, largely due to increased autonomy and reduced travel-related fatigue. Notably, performance metrics were found to be contingent on the extent of organizational infrastructure and communication mechanisms in place. The study underscores the potential efficacy of a hybrid work model that amalgamates the advantages of both formats. By addressing an underexplored area within the context of urban Indian real estate enterprises, this research provides substantive contributions to human resource strategy and workplace policy formulation, while offering a valuable reference point for future empirical inquiries.
Files
33. Pragati Srivastava - Online (MAY 2025).pdf
Files
(1.2 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:84ceea17b81dd63462363d4f2923c7c6
|
1.2 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- ISSN
- 2455-295X
Related works
- Is compiled by
- Journal article: 2455-295X (ISSN)
References
- 1. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
- 2. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
- 3. Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. Z. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251
- 4. Felstead, A., &Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work–life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12097
- 5. Galanti, T., Guidetti, G., Mazzei, E., Zappalà, S., & Toscano, F. (2021). Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on employees' remote work productivity, engagement, and stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(7), e426–e432. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236
- 6. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
- 7. Dhar, R. L. (2020). Impact of remote work on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in Indian corporates. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 7(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322093720908033
- 8. Ipsen, C., van Veldhoven, M., Kirchner, K., & Hansen, J. P. (2021). Sustainable remote working – A future possibility or a pandemic-induced trend?Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(6), 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002176
- 9. Morgeson, F. P., Mitchell, T. R., & Liu, D. (2020). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0067
- 10. Milasi, S., González-Vázquez, I., & Fernández-Macías, E. (2020). Telework in the EU before and after the COVID-19: Where we were, where we head to. JRC Science for Policy Report. https://doi.org/10.2760/91451
- 11. Ratten, V. (2021). Digital transformation and innovation in real estate: Challenges and opportunities for remote work. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 39(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-05-2020-0032
- 12. Singh, A., & Srivastava, M. (2022). Hybrid work preferences and satisfaction in India's infrastructure sector: A post-pandemic analysis. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 13(3), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJHCITP.2022070104
- 13. Susilo, Y. O. (2020). Telecommuting and its implications for productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 8, 100261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100261
- 14. Toscano, F., &Zappalà, S. (2020). Social isolation and stress among remote workers during COVID-19: The role of perceived autonomy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176280
- 15. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290