Published March 10, 2023 | Version v1
Journal Open

Comparative Analysis of Powertrain Energy Systems in Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles

Authors/Creators

Contributors

Description

The transition from conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to alternative energy vehicles is critical for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving energy efficiency, and achieving sustainable transportation. This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of powertrain energy systems in Electric Vehicles (EVs), Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs), and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs). The analysis focuses on key performance indicators including energy efficiency, power density, vehicle range, environmental impact, and overall lifecycle costs. Simulation models and experimental data are used to evaluate the operational characteristics and limitations of each powertrain type under standardized driving cycles. Results indicate that EVs demonstrate superior energy efficiency and lower operational emissions, HEVs provide flexible energy management and extended range benefits, while FCEVs show promising performance for long-range applications but face challenges in hydrogen infrastructure and fuel cell costs. The findings provide a comparative framework that can guide vehicle designers, policymakers, and researchers in optimizing powertrain systems for future sustainable mobility solutions.

Files

Comparative Analysis of Powertrain Energy Systems in Electric.pdf

Files (312.3 kB)

Additional details

Dates

Issued
2023-03-10

References

  • 1. Andwari, A., Pesiridis, A., Rajoo, S., Martinez Bonastre, A., & Esfahanian, V. (2017). A review of battery electric vehicle technology and readiness levels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 414–430. (General EV technology review — widely cited in powertrain comparisons
  • 2. National Research Council. (2015). Electrified powertrains In Cost, Effectiveness, and Deployment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light Duty Vehicles (pp. 130–152). The National Academies Press. National Academies
  • 3. Shao, P., & Zheng, H. (2025). Comparison of electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology. Darcy & Roy Press
  • 4. Togun, H., Basem, A., Abdulrazzaq, T., & Biswas, N. (2025). Development and comparative analysis between battery electric vehicles (BEV) and fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV). Applied Energy, 388, 125726. ScienceDirect
  • 5. Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system. (2010). Energy Policy, 38(1), 24–29. ScienceDirect
  • 6. Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and Performance Metrics in Fuel Cell, Battery, and Hybrid Electric Vehicles Under Varying Wind and Road Conditions. (2025). Technologies, 13(4), 150. MDPI
  • 7. Comprehensive Study of Fuel Cell Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Classification, Topologies, and Control System Comparisons. (2023). Applied Sciences, 13(24), 13057. MDPI
  • 8. Yahyaabadi, R., Farhani, G., Rahman, T., Nikan, S., Jirjees, A., & Araji, F. (2025). Deep learning based analysis of power consumption in gasoline, electric, and hybrid vehicles. arXiv. arXiv
  • 9. Chan, C. C. (2007). The state of the art of electric and hybrid vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE. (Classic overview of EV and HEV technologies.)
  • 10. Guzzella, L., & Sciarretta, A. (2013). Vehicle Propulsion Systems: Introduction to Modeling and Optimization. Springer. (Textbook covering powertrain energy management fundamentals.)
  • 11. Saidur, R., et al. (2011). A review on hydrogen fuel cell vehicles: Energy, emissions, and sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
  • 12. Sperling, D., & Cannon, J. S. (2015). Three Revolutions: Steering Automated, Shared, and Electric Vehicles to a Better Future. Island Press. (Policy and comparative perspectives on vehicle technologies.)
  • 13. Pimpale, S. (2021). Impact of Fast Charging Infrastructure on Power Electronics Design. International Journal of Research Science and Management, 8(10), 62-75.