Inertial Basins, Baryogenesis and Early Cosmology - A QTG Re-interpretation
Authors/Creators
Description
v5.0: Addition of contents D, D1.
These papers introduce the concept of "inertial basins" - the local phenomenic oscillatory baseline - resulting from the oscillatory interplay between baryonic mass, shadow mass (incoherent potential energy/mass), and local field dynamics. The consequence is simple: all phenomena are universal, but constants, decay rates, material cohesion, and structural stability emerge from basin-specific averages.
Content A: Inertial Basins as Residual Standing Waves. Inertial basins are the only regions where phenomena can emerge because they represent residual standing waves of the Big Bang field that failed to fully dissipate.
Content A1: Big Bang as the manifestation of a colossal asymmetry within the tachyonic field, so vast that it could not be internally rebalanced. In this optic, baryonic matter is a failure mode, thus explaining its scarcity.
Content A2: Basin Physics: all physical laws are stastitical, and phenomena arising from local oscillatory equilibria within inertial basins. (See also Normalization Horizon in QTG foundamentals https://zenodo.org/records/18219163)
Content A3: Stellar Mechanics: As a logical extention, stars are the primary source of inertial basins, acting as quantum field potential wells by forcing the incoherent quantum oscillations into stable oscillatory enviroments.
Content B: General Baryogenesis in QTG.
Content B1: Element Formation Inside Inertial Basins. Interpretation on nucleosynthesis re-framed as oscillatory self-regulation inside inertial basins. where periodic tables are thus a map of allowed oscillatory minima.
Content B2: Harmonic Intepretation of Quarks in QTG.
Content B3: Protons as Negative Potential Wells. Logical consequence: from the quantum field/oscillatory perspective, protons should be considered potential wells, having thus a negative charge. (For electrons see QTG foundations https://zenodo.org/records/18219163)
Content B4: Nuclear Mechanics in QTG. A field/continuum QTG reinterpretation of atomic fission and atomic fusion.
Content B5: Anti-matter as Shadow-Mass Configurations. Reinterpretation of anti-matter as unstable oscillatory configurations the local baseline rejects due to incompatibility. (See also: https://zenodo.org/records/17338251)
Content B6: Atomic Imaging as Evidence of Oscillatory Field Architecture in QTG. Further evidence supporting QTG based on atomic imaging interpretation.
Content C: Interstellar Object Anomalies. Interstellar Objects are bound to exhibit anomalies due to simple oscillatory mismatch and interference.
Content D: Particle Ontology I. Particles are oscillatory field modes, rather than discrete objects. A "particle" exists only if its oscillatory configuration is stable enough to produce a persistent shadow-mass halo that crosses the C-boundary - the threshold separating baryonic asymmetries, coherent C-state halos, and super C-normalization waves. This naturally distinguishes between stable matter (protons, neutrons in nuclei, electrons, photons) and the vast family of short-lived excitations currently misclassified as "particles".
Content D: Particle Ontology II. The persistent misidentification of transient oscillatory modes as fundamental constituents of reality arises inevitably from phase coincidence - where distinct oscillatory structures converge into observationally indistinguishable states once normalized within the same inertial basin. Thus, apparent fundamentality emerges as an artifact of normalization rather than structural origin.
(Note. a simpler analogy: The presence of a wavefunction within a larger bound system does not confer fundamentality, just as the presence of a color within the optical spectrum does not render that color ontologically primitive)
Extention D1: Higgs as a Minimal Metastable Oscillatory Mode. Rather than conventionally intepreting it as the fundamental particle responsible for 'imparting mass to other particles', the Higgs boson could simply be the minimal metastable oscillatory excitations of the quantum field continuum marking the threshold of inertial normalization.
For QTG foundations https://zenodo.org/records/18537443
For original 3-bodies analysis and solutions https://zenodo.org/records/17965804
For foundations of Chemistry and Quantum Chemistry https://zenodo.org/records/18297790
Files
Content_A1_QTG_Big_Bang_Asymmetry_Addendum.pdf
Files
(715.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:247503680404959ae59b7410e447190b
|
42.1 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:8aafff6150df28d789f748900ce5e643
|
45.3 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:4e5925f17439af825bbdd796c3763789
|
47.8 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:f8764d11ff4ad700b20a4a6823b87d49
|
46.0 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:0bed5420eb1ab176bdb2180dce82f868
|
52.7 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:237798c23b51190d12c171b18143d60c
|
48.5 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:2fe6ec4e64bca95a564aeb5ba5f4bea7
|
44.7 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:0882d62ca648f386bd0b460f60993436
|
40.7 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:e613e6e60f5739f2ca73b1125338231d
|
53.3 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:3db1cedf8cc2c2414af71374ebdd9156
|
54.9 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:4a4f55f8bbc95eceaaa3fad1736b1717
|
48.1 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:6bdb0f7b6155ca8a83c9951b627a92e2
|
52.8 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:557362b25ada67d0ea10b21123b7b0a6
|
40.7 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:01f420e3af96b702c9be13cfaa1ec613
|
54.9 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:63fd55b0c7f9eb987e3ca12890725722
|
43.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Updated
-
2026-01-27