Technology, Innovation, and Digital Food Systems
Authors/Creators
- 1. ICFRE-Tropical Forest Research Institute (Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, Govt. of India) P.O. RFRC, Mandla Road, Jabalpur, MP-482021, India
- 2. Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Jabalpur Engineering College, Jabalpur (MP)
- 3. Government Science College, Jabalpur, MP, India- 482 001.
Description
Digital technologies and innovation are transforming food systems across the supply chain—from production and aggregation through processing, logistics, retail and consumption—creating new pathways to improve the four pillars of food security (availability, access, utilization, stability). This chapter provides a synthesis of the technological building blocks (IoT, remote sensing, AI/ML, block chain, digital marketplaces, fintech and cold-chain logistics), describes representative innovations and deployments, evaluates evidence of impact on food security outcomes, and examines constraints, governance risks, and policy options. The chapter concludes with a research and implementation agenda for making digital food systems inclusive, resilient and nutrition-sensitive. This chapter examined the role of technology, innovation, and digital food systems in shaping contemporary food security outcomes within spatial, socio-economic, and nutritional contexts. It highlighted how digital technologies—such as the Internet of Things (IoT), remote sensing, artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics, digital marketplaces, fintech solutions, and block chain-based traceability—are transforming the agri-food value chain from production and post-harvest management to markets, nutrition, and resilience. These technologies enable data-driven decision-making, improve resource-use efficiency, enhance market transparency, reduce post-harvest losses, and strengthen early warning and risk management systems, thereby influencing all four pillars of food security: availability, access, utilization, and stability. Through representative field deployments, including data-driven extension services (Digital Green and FarmStack), low-cost sensing platforms (Microsoft FarmBeats), digital market integration (e-NAM, India), and block chain traceability pilots (Walmart–IBM Food Trust), the chapter demonstrated that digital innovation can generate tangible productivity, income, and food system governance benefits when appropriately designed and institutionally supported. Evidence reviewed suggests gains in crop yields, price realization, reduction of food losses, and improved food safety responsiveness, with important implications for dietary diversity and nutrition. At the same time, the chapter emphasized critical constraints and equity challenges, including digital divides, gender and social exclusion, data ownership and privacy concerns, platform fragmentation, and financial sustainability of digital interventions. These risks highlight that technology alone cannot deliver food security; rather, outcomes depend on enabling policies, institutional capacity, inclusive design, and robust governance frameworks. The chapter therefore outlined policy, institutional, and design recommendations focused on digital public infrastructure, interoperable data ecosystems, farmer-centric data governance, hybrid extension systems, and nutrition-sensitive innovation. In conclusion, the chapter positions digital food systems as a strategic enabler of sustainable and resilient food security, rather than a standalone solution. By aligning digital innovation with equity, nutrition, and climate resilience objectives—and by grounding implementation in rigorous evidence and participatory governance—digital food systems can contribute meaningfully to advancing global food and nutrition security in the decades ahead.
Files
7. Rajesh Kumar Mishra.pdf
Files
(422.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:495383e7d74ef02d6cd6b036a25eb855
|
422.4 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Barrett, C. B., & Rose, D. C. (2022). Responsible innovation in agri-food systems. Nature Food, 3, 322–327. 2. Bronson, K., & Knezevic, I. (2016). Big data in food and agriculture. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–5. 3. Digital Green. (2021). Evidence Review: Digital Extension and Advisory Services. Digital Green, New Delhi. 4. e-NAM (Electronic National Agriculture Market) official portal and performance reviews (Government of India). 5. FAO, The State of Food and Agriculture 2019: Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Digital Green, FarmStack and Evidence Review, Digital Green organizational reports (2021–2023). 6. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Digital technologies in agriculture and rural areas - Status report (Trendov et al.), FAO Open Knowledge Repository. 7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (1996). Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food Summit Plan of Action. FAO, Rome. 8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2019). The State of Food and Agriculture 2019: Moving Forward on Food Loss and Waste Reduction. FAO, Rome. 9. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2022). Digital Technologies in Agriculture and Rural Areas: Status Report. FAO, Rome. 10. Government of India. (2022). e-NAM: One Nation One Market for Farmers. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, New Delhi. 11. IBM. (2018). IBM Food Trust: Blockchain for the World's Food Supply. IBM Corporation White Paper. 12. IBM/Walmart Food Trust blockchain case materials and industry blogs detailing supply-chain traceability pilots. 13. IDinsight. (2020). Evaluation of Digital Green's Advisory Platforms in India. IDinsight Impact Evaluation Report. 14. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2023). Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures. ITU, Geneva. 15. Kamilaris, A., Kartakoullis, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2017). A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 143, 23–37. 16. Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91, 100315. 17. Market research: IMARC Group / MarketsandMarkets / Global Market Insights reports on precision farming market size and growth (2024–2025 estimates). 18. OECD. (2020). Digital Opportunities for Better Agricultural Policies. OECD Publishing, Paris. 19. Shepherd, M., Turner, J. A., Small, B., & Wheeler, D. (2020). Priorities for science to overcome hurdles in digital agriculture adoption. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(14), 5083–5092. 20. Small Farmers Agribusiness Consortium (SFAC). (2023). Electronic National Agriculture Market (e-NAM): Performance and Progress Report. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, Government of India. 21. Trendov, N. M., Varas, S., & Zeng, M. (2019). Digital Technologies in Agriculture and Rural Areas: Briefing Paper. FAO, Rome. 22. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, New York. 23. Vasisht, D., Kapetanovic, Z., Won, J., et al. (2017). FarmBeats: An IoT platform for data-driven agriculture. Proceedings of the 14th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 515–529. 24. Walmart Inc. (2019). Blockchain Traceability in the Food Supply Chain. Walmart Global Technology Report. 25. Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M.-J. (2017). Big data in smart farming – A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80. 26. World Bank, Digital Agriculture Roadmap Playbook, World Bank Documents (2021). Vasisht, D., et al. (2017). "FarmBeats: An IoT Platform for Data-Driven Agriculture," Microsoft Research; FarmBeats project page. 27. World Bank. (2019). Future of Food: Harnessing Digital Technologies to Improve Food System Outcomes. World Bank Group, Washington, DC. 28. World Bank. (2021). Digital Agriculture Roadmap (DAR) Playbook: Building the Foundations for Digital Agricultural Transformation. World Bank Group, Washington, DC.