Interdisciplinary and Emerging Research Frontiers
Authors/Creators
- 1. ICFRE-Tropical Forest Research Institute (Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, Govt. of India) P.O. RFRC, Mandla Road, Jabalpur, MP-482021, India
- 2. Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science Jabalpur Engineering College Jabalpur (MP)
- 3. Government Science College Jabalpur, MP, India- 482 001
Description
This chapter has examined interdisciplinary and emerging research frontiers as a foundational paradigm for contemporary scholarship in humanities, social sciences, commerce, and management. It established that complex global challenges—such as artificial intelligence governance, sustainability transitions, digital economy transformation, and data-driven public policy—cannot be effectively addressed through isolated disciplinary approaches. Instead, these issues demand integrative frameworks that combine ethical reflection, social analysis, economic reasoning, managerial insight, and technological understanding. The chapter articulated the conceptual foundations of interdisciplinarity, highlighted key convergent domains including AI–society relations, climate and sustainability research, digital work and organizational change, and data-driven governance, and emphasized the role of methodological innovation in enabling robust, impact-oriented research. At the same time, the chapter critically acknowledged structural, epistemic, and ethical challenges that constrain interdisciplinary practice, including institutional silos, evaluation misalignments, and coordination complexity. It argued that future research agendas must move toward convergence science, responsible innovation, and inclusive knowledge co-creation, with stronger engagement from policymakers, industry, and civil society. Overall, the chapter positions interdisciplinary research not merely as an academic strategy, but as a strategic necessity for producing socially relevant, ethically grounded, and future-ready knowledge, capable of guiding societies toward resilience, equity, and sustainability in the twenty-first century.
Files
1. Rajesh Kumar Mishra.pdf
Files
(412.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:81fb76e279f34d79a7eb4e1572f53c55
|
412.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(4), 1–28. 2. Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven. 3. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (2012). The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 5. Divyansh Mishra, Rajesh Kumar Mishra and Rekha Agarwal. (2025a). IMPACTS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON SOCIETY. In Journal of Science Research International (Vol. 11, Number 1, pp. 29–43). Bhumi Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15044020. 6. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. 7. Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. 8. Helbing, D., et al. (2019). Will democracy survive big data and artificial intelligence? Scientific American, 321(3), 30–35. ic policy documents 9. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2022). World Employment and Social Outlook: The Role of Digital Labour Platforms. Geneva. 10. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2022). World Employment and Social Outlook: The Role of Digital Labour Platforms in Transforming the World of Work. ILO, Geneva. 11. Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge, London. 12. Kitchin, R. (2021). Data Lives: How Data Are Made and Shape Our World. Bristol University Press. 13. Kitchin, R. (2021). Data Lives: How Data Are Made and Shape Our World. Bristol University Press, Bristol. 14. Mehrabi, N., et al. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35. 15. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35. 16. Mishra, R.K., Mishra, Divyansh, and Agarwal, R. (2025b), AI for industry, education, and research: Transforming knowledge, innovation and society, In book: AI for Industry, Education and Research, September 2025, ISBN: 978-81-993182-6-7, 41-64. 17. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity Press, Cambridge. 18. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group, New York. 19. OECD. (2023). Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation for Sustainable Development. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. 20. PwC. (2019). Sizing the Prize: What's the Real Value of AI for Your Business and How Can You Capitalize? PricewaterhouseCoopers. 21. Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 22. Stirling, A. (2015). Emancipating transformations: From controlling 'the transition' to culturing plural radical progress. STEPP Working Paper, University of Sussex. 23. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, New York. 24. van der Ploeg, F., & Rezai, A. (2020). Stranded assets in the transition to a carbon-free economy. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12, 281–298. 25. World Economic Forum. (2024). The Global Risks Report 2024. World Economic Forum, Geneva.