CIPPO Evaluation of Early Student Learning Outcomes in the First-Level Implementation of the Strengthened SHS Curriculum
Authors/Creators
Contributors
Researcher (2):
Description
Abstract
This study evaluated the first-level implementation of the Strengthened Senior High School (SHS) Curriculum in the Philippines using the Context–Input–Process–Product–Output (CIPPO) evaluation framework, with emphasis on students’ perspectives. Employing a qualitative descriptive–evaluative design, data were collected from 43 Grade 11 students in a public senior high school through a CIPPO-based open-ended questionnaire. Thematic analysis revealed that a supportive learning environment, positive teacher–student relationships, and peer collaboration facilitated learner engagement during curriculum transition. While instructional processes were largely characterized by interactive and student-centered pedagogies, challenges related to workload intensity and pacing emerged. Findings further indicated that students developed transferable academic and personal competencies, including critical thinking, self-management, and confidence. Although learners perceived the strengthened curriculum as relevant preparation for higher education and employment, they expressed the need for greater experiential and applied learning opportunities. Overall, the curriculum demonstrates promising early outcomes but requires continued refinement in resource provision, instructional balance, and experiential learning integration. The study highlights the value of learner-centered, CIPPO-based evaluation in informing continuous curriculum improvement and quality assurance in senior high education.
Files
1CIPPO Evaluation of Early Student Learning Outcomes in the First-Level Implementation of the Strengthened SHS Curriculum.pdf
Files
(172.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:7cea4dbb9a5a3c8cf400203c3e65f49f
|
172.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Abragan, F. Q., Abarcas, V., Aquino, I. M. & Bagongon, R. E. (2022). Research Review on K-12 Curriculum Implementation in The Philippines: A Generic Perspective. European Journal of Educational and Social Sciences, 7 (1), 1 – 8. https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7272126
- Acebuche, Y. (2025). House Bill allowing K-12 students to choose from two academic paths after Grade 10 passes second reading. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://www.pids.gov.ph/details/news/in-the-news/house-bill-allowing-k-12-students-to-choose-from-two-academic-paths-after-grade-10-passes-second-rea
- Alanshori, M. Z., Maulidi, A., Zahidi, S., Kusaeri, K., & Suparto, S. (2025). The Application of the CIPP Evaluation Model in Educational Programs in Indonesia. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 7(2), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v7i2.7390
- Alipio, M. (2020). Education during COVID-19 Era: Are learners in a Less-Economically Developed Country Ready for E-Learning? https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esrepo/216098.html
- Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press. https://cetl.ppu.edu/sites/default/files/publications/-John_Biggs_and_Catherine_Tang-_Teaching_for_Quali-BookFiorg-.pdf
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Brillantes, K. D. B., Orbeta, A. C. Jr., Francisco-Abrigo, K. A., Capones, E. M., & Jovellanos, J. B. B. (2019). Status of Senior High School Implementation: A Process Evaluation. PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2019-13. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps1913.pdf
- DepEd Memorandum No. 048, s. 2025. Pilot Implementation of the Strengthened Senior High School Curriculum for Grade 11 in School Year 2025-2026. Department of Education https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DM_s2025_048r.pdf
- Fitri, Z. Z., Sukiman, S., & Nurusshoimah, N. (2024). The Evaluation of Kurikulum Merdeka with Context Input Process Product (CIPP) Model. JOYCED: Journal of Early Childhood Education, 4(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.14421/joyced.2024.41-04
- Hasudungan, A. N., Suboh, A. S., & Nababan, S. A. (2024). Urgency of Evaluation of Sekolah Penggerak Program Through the Cipp Model (Context, Input, Process, Product): A Critical Study. Education & Learning, 4(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.57251/el.v4i1.1288
- Ignacio, A. A., & Bajet, A. P. (2025). Assessing the implementation of Senior High School mathematics curriculum: Teachers' and students' perceptions in Calbayog City Division, Philippines. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2025.6.1.918
- Jackson, V., Vicki Louise O'Brien, & Richards, S. (2023). Investigating the Impact of Experiential Learning on Employability Skill Development and Employment outcomes: a UK Case Study of MBA Students from the Indian Subcontinent. Journal of Education and Work, 36(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2023.2231366
- Kazu, I. Y., Kuvvetli, M., Kuvvetli, R., Tan, A. R., Çolak, S., Cevher, A., & Akdeniz, E. C. (2023). The Power of Positive School Climate: A Review on Its Impact on Student Outcomes and Teacher Well-Being. 14th International Conference on Culture, Civilization and Social Sciences. 90-101. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398256181_From_Framework_to_Practice_A_Study_of_Positive_Behaviour_Supports_Implementation_in_Swedish_Compulsory_Schools
- Kusmiyati, N., Hamidah, & Kadir. (2023). CIPPO Model Evaluation on the English Language Training Program At the Indonesian Navy Education Services. IJHCM (International Journal of Human Capital Management), 7(1), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.21009/IJHCM.07.01.8
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/naturalistic-inquiry/book842
- Maba, W. (2017). Teacher's perception on the implementation of the assessment process in 2013 curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n2.26
- Nugraha, H. S., Syihabuddin, Y., Mulyati, Y., & Damayanti, V. S. (2025). Evaluating assessment of learning in writing classrooms using Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model. International Journal of Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v17i2.65546
- Nurpaidah, N., Yunus, M., & Elpisah, E. (2025). Impact of Physical Infrastructure and Technology on Student Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Development, 2(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijed.v2i2.302
- Pinuela, M. F. G. (2024). Teachers' experiences and self-assessment in teaching Biology in Senior High School in the Philippines. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0027
- Rizal, F., Verawardina, U., Nadawina, N., Sutadji, E., Kuntadi, I., & Mohd Nawi, M. N. (2023). Optimization Of CIPP Evaluation Model as An Escalation of Educational-Industrial Collaboration Program. PaperASIA, 39(6b), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v39i6(b).44
- Sales, J. N., Lu, S., Prudente, M., & Aguja, S. (2022). Evaluation of senior high school curriculum: Perspectives and experiences of students and teachers. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 15(1), 544-565. https://ijci.net/index.php/IJCI/article/view/1141/604
- Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press. https://books.google.com.ph/books/about/The_CIPP_Evaluation_Model.html?hl=id&id=5lTLDAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
- Yoto, Y., Marsono, M., Qolik, A., & Romadin, A. (2024). Evaluation of teaching factory using CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model to improve vocational high school students' skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 14(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i1.62573