Impact of Uterocervical Angle on Preterm Birth
Authors/Creators
- 1. International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
Description
Abstract
Introduction: Preterm birth is defined by ACOG as birth between 28 weeks of gestation to 37 weeks of gestation. Preterm birth complications are the leading cause of neonatal death. preterm babies are at increased risk of neuro developmental impairments, respiratory and gastrointestinal complications, sepsis etc. Approximately 40-50% of all preterm births are idiopathic,30% is attributable to PPROM,15-20% are elective due to medical reasons. Prediction of preterm is one of the most difficult and important tasks. Among them uterocervical angle have major impact on preterm birth which is a simpler technique that can be measured by transvaginal ultrasonography.
Aim & Objective: To study the impact of uterocervical angle by transvaginal ultrasonography on preterm birth.
Methodology: This study was conducted in tertiary care hospital over a period of one year among 110 patients. patients will be selected according to the inclusion criteria and they are explained about the nature of study and informed consent was obtained in their own language A complete history was taken .Transvaginal ultrasonography was done along with their routine antenatal scans in 2nd trimester(anamoly scan),3rd trimester (growth scan) for the measurement of uterocervical angle. Two measurement were obtained in each patient during the course of examination and shortest measurement was used for reporting. If uterocervical cervical angle was more than 95 degrees at any time of examination, I will treat the patient accordingly. After that all women were followed- both normal angle and abnormal angle patient with intervention throughout the course of gestation and delivered in our hospital. After delivery POG, weight of newborn, sex, APGAR, need for ICU were noted and analysed.
Results: Among 110 patients in 3rd trimester, 64 patients have angle less than 95, In that 60 patients delivered at term and 4 patients were delivered preterm.46 patients have angle more than 95, In that 33 patients were delivered preterm and 13 patients were delivered term.so we concluded that acute angle delivered at term and wider the angle more prone for preterm delivery even if we intervene if the angle is wider. Mean UCA at second trimester preterm delivered patients was 118֯ for less than 34 weeks,96 for 34-37weeks which was significantly higher as compared to the patients with term delivered group 91֯.Mean UCA value at third trimester of preterm delivered patients was 122֯ for those who delivered less than 34 weeks,100֯ for those who delivered between 34-37 weeks which was significantly higher as compared to term delivered patients which was 94 So it is concluded that patients with greater UCA had significantly higher chances of preterm delivery even after the intervention made if the angle is high and it was also seen in our study UCA value keeps on increasing with gestational age and mean UCA at every trimester predicts spontaneous preterm birth with equal predictive value and efficacy.
Conclusion: Uterocervical angle have major impact on preterm birth and it was concluded that a wide uterocervical angle ≥95 and ≥105 degrees detected during any trimester was associated with an increased risk for spontaneous preterm birth <37 and<34weeks, respectively. The advantage of uterocervical angle is that its measurement in each trimester has also shown very good results in prediction of preterm labour. It can be measured at the time of routine antenatal ultrasound (ANOMALY SCAN, GROWTH SCAN) thus obviating the need for additional ultrasounds. This can lead to its application for the prediction of spontaneous preterm labour both in low and high risk population. Thus, it helps for early intervention and prevention of complications in preterm birth.
Files
THILAGA.pdf
Files
(922.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:f28a0ee93065ba2f602fd667f5469d25
|
922.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
- Repository URL
- https://www.ijmacr.com/issue/archive_issue/67
References
- 1. World Health Organization. Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth –Abdominal pain in later pregnancy.2003. www. who.int/reproductive health/ impac/symptoms/Abdominal -pain-later-S119-S123. 2. Howsan CP, Kinney MV ,Lawn JE .Born T oo soon :The Global Action Report On Preterm Birth. Geneva, Switzerland :World Health Organization; 2012 3. Liu L, Oza S ,Hogan D, et al .Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15:an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals.Lancet.2016; 388 (10063):3027-3035 4. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF ,Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet.2008;371:75-84 5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No.171: Management of Preterm Labor .Obstet Gynecol. 2016: 128(4);e155-64 6. Eden RD, Penka A, Britt DW , Landsberger EJ, Evans MI. Re-evaluating the role of the MFM specialist: Lead, follow , or get out of the way .J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.2005;18:253-8. 7. Muller-Heubach E, Rubinstein DN,Schwarz SS. Histologic chorioamnionitis and preterm delivery in different patient populations. Obstet Gynecol.1990; 75:622-6.85 8. Myers KM, Feltovich H, Mazza E, et al.The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy.Journal of biomechanics. Jun 25 2015;48(9):1511-1523. 9. Fernandez M, House M, jambawaliker S, et al. Investigating the mechanical function of the cervix during pregnancy using finite element models derived from high-resolution 3D MRI. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Mar 2016;19(4):404-417. 10. House M, McCabe R,Socrate S. Using imaging-based, three dimensional models of the cervix and uterus for studies of cervical changes during pregnancy. Clinical anatomy(New Y ork, N. Y .).Jan 2013:26(1);97-104 11. Cannie MM, Dobrescu O, Guccciardo L, et al. Arabian cervical pessary in women at high risk of preterm birth: a magnetic resonance imaging observational follow-up study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Oct 2013:42(4):426-43. 12. Arabin B, Alfirevic Z. Cervical pessaries for prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: past, present and future. Ultrasound in obstetrics and Gynecology.Oct 2013:42[4]:390-399 13. Sieroszewski P , Jasinski A, Perence M, Banach R, Oszukowski P .The Arabian pessary for the treatment of threatened mid-trimester miscarriage or premature labour and miscarriage: a case series.The journal of maternal-fetal& neonatal medicine Jun 2009;22(6):469-472 14. Adel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Abdel-Aleem MA. Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.2013; 5:Cd007873. 15. Goya M, Protcorona L, Merced C, et al. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomized controlled trial. Lancet. May 12 2012:379(9828):1800-1806. 16. WHO Preterm birth guidelines 19th august 2018.https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/ detail/preterm-birth. 17. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No.171: Management of Preterm Labor .Obstet Gynecol.2016: 128 (4);e155-64 18. Sochacki-Wojcicka N, Wojcicki J, Bomba-Opon D,Wielgos M.Anterior cervical angle as a new biophysical ultrasound marker for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Ultrasound in obstetrics and Gynecology. Sep 2015;46(3):377-378 19. Dziadosz M, Bennett T A, Dolin C, West Honart A, Pham A, Lee SS, et al. Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215: 376.el-7 20. Sur B, Misra S, Dash S.Evaluation of the anterior cervical angle of the uterus to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Int J Reprod 21. Owen J, Y ost N, Berghella V , Thom E, Swain M, Dildy GA. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA. 2001;286(11):1340-8. 22. Fuchs IB, Henrich W, Osthues K, Dudenhausen JW. Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes presenting with threatened preterm labour. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:554-7 23. MS, Skentou CA, Royston P , Yu CKH, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of patient-specific risk of early preterm delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical length: a population-based prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 362–367. 24. Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Nicolaides KH, Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:462-469. 25. Wadhawan U, Shah N, Patil A. Prediction of preterm labour by cervical length. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(7):2978-2982. 26. Greco E, Gupta R, Syngelaki A, Poon LCY , Nicolaides KH. First-Trimester Screening for Spontaneous Preterm Delivery with Maternal Characteristics and Cervical Length. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31: 154-161 27. Sur B, Misra S, Dash S. Evaluation of the anterior cervical angle of the uterus to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017;6:2323-7. 28. Bafal O, Kyak H, nce O, Baflkran Y , Gedikbafl A. The prediction of preterm birth threat by uterocervical angle. Perinatal Journal 2018;26(1):11-17 29. Fuchs F . Monet B, Ducruet T , Chaillet N, Audibert F . Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: A large cohort study. Plos 2018;13 (1):e0191002. One. 30. Hurris HH, Collins JW Jr , Wright RO. Racial/ethnic disparities in preterm clues from environmental exposures. Curr Opin Pediatr .2011;23(2):227-232. doi:10.1097/MOP .0b013e328344568f. birth: 31. Vinturache A, McKeating A, Daly N, Sheehan S, Turner M. Maternal body Mass index and the prevalence of spontaneous and elective preterm deliveries In an Irish obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ open. 2017; 7(10): e015258. 32. Banicevic AC, Popovic M, Ceric A. Cervical length measured by transvaginal Ultrasonography and cervicovaginal infection as predictor of preterm birth risk. Acta Inform Med. 2014;22(2):128-32. 33. Crane J, Hutchens D. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical Length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a Systematic review. Ultrasound In Obstetrics And Gynecology 2008;31(5):579-587. 34. Shahshahan Z, Iravani H. Comparison of CRP and ALK-P serum levels in the Prediction of preterm delivery. Adv Biomed Res. 2016;5:17. 35. Lee HJ. Park, T ae Chul, Norwitz, Errol R. Management of pregnancies with Cervical shortening: A very short cervix is a very big problem. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009; 2 (2): 107-15. 36. Arisoy R, Murat Y. Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of the cervix in Asymptomatic singleton pregnancy and management options in short cervix. J Pregnancy 2012; 2012: 201-628. 37. Singh N. Dubey P , Gupta N, Dwivedi S, Balyan R, Chandanan A. Comparative study of various tocolytics in preterm labour . International Joumal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015:4(2):334-7. 38. Chandiramani M, Shennan AH. Premature cervical change and the use of Cervical cerclage. Fetal Matern Med Rev 2007; 18 (1): 25-52. 39. Andersen HF , Nugent CE, Wanty SD, et al.: Prediction of risk for preterm Delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 163(3): 859-67. 40. Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, et al.: Patients with an ultrasonographic Cervical length < or =15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous Preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182(6): 1458-67. 41. Markham KB, Iams JD: Measuring the Cervical Length. Clin Obstet Gynecol.2016; 59(2): 252–63. 42. Bohîlţea RE, Munteanu 0, Turcan N, et al.: A debate about ultrasound and Anatomic aspects of the cervix in spontaneous preterm birth. J Med Life. 2016; 9(4): 342–7. 43. Sotiriadis A, Papatheodorou S, Kavvadias A, Makrydimas G. Transvaginal Cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm birth in women with Threatened preterm labor: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:54-64 44. O'Hara, Sandra & Zelesco, Marilyn & Sun, Zhonghua. (2013). Cervical length For predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement Techniques. Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 16. 124-134. 10.1002/ j.2205