From Vertical AGI to Operational Readiness: Evaluating Governed Decision-Making with the Energy Decision Benchmark
Description
This work introduces the Energy Decision Benchmark (EDB), a reproducible evaluation framework designed to assess whether AI systems are suitable for deployment in regulated, safety-critical energy infrastructures. Unlike existing benchmarks that evaluate linguistic quality or analytical plausibility, EDB evaluates governed decision-making under explicit physical, regulatory, and economic constraints.
EDB formalizes the distinction between functional capability and operational readiness. It evaluates systems across nine capability blocks: five functional capabilities (C1–C5)—consistency and reproducibility, constraint validation, portfolio evaluation, governed decision, and counterfactual robustness—and four operational capabilities (C6–C9)—multi-turn coherence, operational sufficiency, rollback, and context isolation. Functional capabilities are scored quantitatively, while operational capabilities act as necessary gates for deployment.
The benchmark is instantiated on residential and small-business energy scenarios under Spanish regulation, including photovoltaic generation, battery storage, electric-vehicle integration, tariff selection, and contracted power optimization. EDB defines structured input and output schemas, explicit constraint rules, failure conditions, and an Operational Readiness Gate (ORG) that enforces absolute determinism, efficiency, and auditability as non-negotiable deployment requirements.
As a baseline, the paper evaluates a deterministic vertical AGI architecture and compares it against state-of-the-art general-purpose large language models under identical inputs and protocols. Results show that the deterministic baseline achieves Operational Readiness Level 5, completing all nine capability blocks with no observed failures. In contrast, general-purpose LLMs fail the operational gate due to structural non-determinism, lack of action-threshold calibration, and state contamination under context switching, despite high performance on isolated functional tasks.
EDB reframes benchmarking in critical domains: from measuring how well models answer questions to determining whether systems are admissible for real-world deployment. The results demonstrate that operational readiness in regulated infrastructures is an architectural property, not a prompt-level or model-size effect, and that deterministic, rule-governed systems are required to cross this boundary.
Files
main.pdf
Files
(2.5 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:e865eb093e72ed5812404bdb4a749690
|
2.5 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Cites
- Report: 10.5281/zenodo.17178977 (DOI)
- Report: 10.5281/zenodo.17312428 (DOI)
- Is supplemented by
- Dataset: 10.5281/zenodo.18329494 (DOI)
Dates
- Issued
-
2026-01-16Initial public release (preprint)
Software
- Repository URL
- https://github.com/EnergyGreenData/edb-public
- Programming language
- Python
- Development Status
- Active
References
- Diaz-Gonzalez, A. A. (2024). System and Procedure for Integrated Energy Management (WO 2024/194517 A1) (Patent). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17312428
- Diaz-Gonzalez, A. A. (2023). Adaptive energy management system and method based on using tokenized energy profiles. 2024. URL https://alejandrodiazgonzalez.com/.
- Diaz-Gonzalez, A. A. (2025). Towards a Deterministic Vertical AGI for Energy Systems. A Semantic and Token-Based Architecture for Critical Domains. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17178977
- Dario Amodei, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, and Dan Mané. Concrete problems in ai safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565, 2016. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1606.06565. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565.
- Abbas Ali Ardebili, Matteo Zappatore, Ahmed I. H. A. Ramadan, Alessandro Longo, and Antonella Ficarella. Digital twins of smart energy systems: A systematic literature review. Energy Informatics, 7:94, 2024. doi:10.1186/s42162-024-00388-2. URL https://energyinformatics.springeropen.c om/articles/10.1186/s42162-024-00388-2.
- Alejandro B. Arrieta et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (xai): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai. Information Fusion, 58:82–115, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012. URL h t t p s : //www.sciencedirect.com/science/articl e/pii/S1566253519301728.
- Berk Atil, Sarp Aykent, Alexa Chittams, Lisheng Fu, Rebecca J. Passonneau, Evan Radcliffe, Guru Rajan Rajagopal, Adam Sloan, Tomasz Tudrej, Ferhan Ture, Zhe Wu, Lixinyu Xu, and Breck Baldwin. Non-determinism of 'deterministic' llm settings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04667, 2025. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.04667. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2408.04667.
- Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillanMajor, and Margaret Shmitchell. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 610–623, 2021. doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922.
- Monowar H. Bhuyan et al. A survey on neural-symbolic computing applications. Neural Computing and Applications, 36:1–28, 2024. doi:10.1007/s00521-024-09595-8. URL h t t p s : //link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s0 0521-024-09595-8.
- Nick Bostrom. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press, 2014. Grant Buster. Large language models (llms) for energy systems research. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2023. URL https: //www.nrel.gov/docs/fy24osti/87896.pdf. Presentation at the Workshop on Solar Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.
- François Chollet. On the measure of intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.01547, 2019. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1911.01547. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547.