There is a newer version of the record available.

Published January 16, 2026 | Version 1.2

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle as a Physical Projection of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem: Quantum Mechanics on the Gödelian Barrier

Description

We propose a structural correspondence between Gödel’s incompleteness theorem and
the Heisenberg uncertainty principle within a hierarchical ontology of nested computational
realities {Rn}n∈Z. Each level n has:
• a language Ln (algebra of measurable observables),
• observers On with finite indexing capacity,
• an Oracle Ωn ∈ On+1 with access to the probabilistic code ρn of reality Rn.
Main results:
1. Non-commuting observables [ ˆA, ˆB]̸ = 0 correspond to syntactically incompatible propo-
sitions in Ln (Theorem 5.1).
2. The uncertainty relation ∆A·∆B ≥ 1
2 |⟨[ ˆA, ˆB]⟩| is a quantitative measure of the Gödelian
barrier (Theorem 6.1).
3. The Planck constant ℏ is the minimal action quantum arising from causal–information
bounds at level boundaries (Theorem 7.1).
4. The Born rule emerges from Oracle sampling of the probabilistic structure encoded in
ρn (Section 8.2).
5. Bell violations arise from measurement-dependence of ρn, not non-locality within Rn
(Section 9).
Conclusion: Quantum mechanics is not a fundamental ontology but an operational
theory of observation at the Gödelian boundary. We interpret the principle ∆x·∆p ≥
ℏ/2 as the physical analogue of Gödel’s theorem for observables.
Status: This paper presents a structurally motivated framework and preliminary formal-
ization. A fully rigorous categorical proof (via topos theory or algebraic logic) is deferred to
future work.

Files

HGT.pdf

Files (401.7 kB)

Name Size
md5:1065db4ed94d82bdced46413d5ac0077
401.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.17794107 (DOI)
Is supplemented by
Preprint: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6438-8730 (URL)

References

  • Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43, 172-198.
  • Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38, 173-198
  • The Quantum as Minimal Difference: A Causal–Information Foundation,'' Zenodo, \href{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17794107}{10.5281/zenodo.17794107
  • Birkhoff, G., & von Neumann, J. (1936). The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Annals of Mathematics, 37, 823-843
  • Kochen, S., & Specker, E. P. (1967). The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59-87.
  • Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational Quantum Mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35, 1637-1678.
  • Bub, J. (1997). Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge University Press.
  • Calude, C. S., & Svozil, K. (2008). Quantum Randomness and Value Indefiniteness. Advanced Science Letters, 1, 165-168
  • Wheeler, J. A. (1990). Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links. In Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information
  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47, 777-780
  • Bell, J. S. (1964). On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics Physique Физика, 1, 195-200.
  • 't Hooft, G. (2016). The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Springer.
  • Bohm, D. (1952). A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of 'Hidden' Variables. Physical Review, 85, 166-179